Posts made by orcageo

Aaaa so you can attack with everything you have got if they are accompanied by destroyers. Thank you very much

If not then only the destroyers can take place in the sea battle.

Lets say that in a specific sea zone there are a number of submarines ( 2 or more) with no other ships for support and the enemy wants to make a sea battle with the submarines sending from different sea zones, lets say 4 destroyers, can he deploy cruisers and battleships to fight the submarines or do only the destroyers take place in the sea battle. I am asking this question because one of my players has 4 sbs in a sea zone and the other wants to attack with everything he has got. Thank you

What about the straits of Denmark do you have to control it only with Denmark or with Norway too?

Thank you very much I understand what you mean. I might have mixed the question but I had a dispute and had to ask.

Another question I am afraid. If somebody controls Girblartar and has ships only on sea zone 92 can his enemy comence an amfibious attack to Giblartar from sea zone 91 without needing to fight a sea battle with the ships in zone 92?
Second question. If I control Maroco and my enemy Giblartar can I make an amfibious assault from Maroco with transporters although he may have sea units only in sea zone 92 or are they lost?  And if I have ships in sea zone 91 do we have to start a sea battle before the fight of the land units? thank you

thank you very much for the tip

A silly question because I have a dispute with one of my game buddies. He claims that when a fighter goes with tactical bomber and gives it attack value 4 from 3, or when an artillery goes with a ground unit and gives attack value 2 from 1 then the fighter or the artillery must be lost if the tactical or the ground unit is lost in battle. Is that the case?

Thank you very much Krieghund!

So when a transport loads or unloads it means its at port and it cannot be fired upon even if the sub is at the same sea zone?
I also would like to ask, if a sub wants to attack a cruiser for example, and its in the same sea zone, declares a surprise attack and misses does the cruiser fight back or does this mean that the attack stops there and the sub submerges? Can the sub attack from another sea zone or must it always be on the same sea zone with its opponent?

That’s a good point but the moment someone does it the whole game changes and historicaly it makes no sense. Anyway I think one could be flexible with this rule. Thank you for your comment

Hi I am new at this forum and have really enjoyed the Europe version. I beleive that when either side attacks a truly neutral country other neutrals should not change to pro allies or pro axis depending on who attacked first. It is unfair. I mean why does Columbia become pro allies if Germany attacks Turkey, historically it makes no sense.
Fighting each time for a neutral country makes it more difficult and more interesting. What do you think?