Posts made by max334
-
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
I continued with the Japanese battle map and edited the sz93 battle. Pls look over it to see if it was done right.
l22-1-trulpen-vs-max334-p2v US R14 1.2.tsvg -
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
sending you 2 maps. One for each of the battles you need to allocate hits for (sz6 and sz93)
l22-1-trulpen-vs-max334-p2v R14 J battle 1.tsvg
l22-1-trulpen-vs-max334-p2v-r14.1 G battle 1.tsvg -
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
you have scramble options from Japan and/or to Morocco
-
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
not sure if you’re not quite finished or you just forgot to send the file/game
-
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
remember to put an Inf in Italy. I want to put up at least a little fight before you take back Rome
-
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
not really, unless you want to move S Caucasus troops
-
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
pls edit off 1 UK Inf from the UK and put on Italy
-
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
I guess you can just keep going. ANZAC will move 2 Java ftrs to sz21
-
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
@trulpen thanks for the time. Not sure how much better this plan is, but lets get the show back on the road. Scramble option to 50
l22-1-trulpen-6-vs-max334-p2v A13.1.tsvg -
RE: L22 PtV max334 (Axis+7) vs FlyingBadger (Allies)
scramble option to 107 and 94
37891_7_fr (2).tsvg -
RE: L22 PtV max334 (Axis+7) vs FlyingBadger (Allies)
I apologize for not letting you know that I would be gone for a little over a week. I was also preoccupied.
37891_7_uk (2).tsvg -
RE: L22 PtV max334 (Axis+7) vs FlyingBadger (Allies)
yes, sorry we just got back from vacation. Let me look at our game
-
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
@trulpen Things are looking much better for the Axis now. You came out of the Queensland battle looking really good. And, of course Moscow also set me back a good amount (TUV wise). We are back from vacation, but I cant send you this file I’ve worked on. I think its a flawed plan. I’ll have to reconsider my Pacific strategy given these recent turn of events.
-
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
@trulpen sounds fair. You can add back any units that would have survived given 2 less ftrs.
-
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
@trulpen Yes, like I said, I didnt see the threat. I had moved a US bomber to Queensland. I had moved 2 ANZAC ftrs to Java to defend against threat from battleship. We were skipping countries and it was missed
-
RE: L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
I had moved 2 ANZAC ftrs to Java. Not sure how we should handle that. And I’m not sure why, but I was totally oblivious to the threat you posed to Queensland.