Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. mattbiernat
    M
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 2
    • Posts 7
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    mattbiernat

    @mattbiernat

    0
    Reputation
    15
    Profile views
    7
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online
    Age 24

    mattbiernat Unfollow Follow

    Latest posts made by mattbiernat

    • RE: What if U.S. invaded Soviet Union?

      @CWO:

      A few comments:

      On the part about the US using on Russia the same techniques it used on Japan, note that Japan is a tiny in size, and is an island nation that sits in the Pacific Ocean,

      Sure I agree that Japan was much smaller. However Japanese were much more reluctant to surrender than Russians. In Iwo Jimma out of 23,000 defenders, 22,000 died defending and only ~1,000 surrendered. Russians on the other hand were known to surrender by hundreds of thousands.

      Now if you are referring to Japan being smaller than Russia, know this that Japan was much more industrialized than Russia. They might have been a smaller nation but they were very powerful smaller nation.

      @CWO:

      The overwhelming proportion of its industry is far inland, completely out of range of any coastal bombardment.

      Thats true. Russia is a huge land mass, yet B24 Liberator had a range of 3,000 miles. Given that USA would invade coastal cities around Russia, they would be able to lunch bombing missions anywhere in the country and knock out whatever industry they still had going.

      @CWO:

      On the part about “U.S. could repeat Pearl Harbor but this time with Russians as offenders”, this seems to imply that it was the US rather than Japan which arranged the attack on Pearl Harbor.  I assume this is a reference to the old Roosevelt-wanted-the-Japanese-to-attack conspiracy theory which has been floating around for decades.

      Yes. This is perhaps a discussion for another topic. But the way US lined up their fighters and ships nicely in a row and ready to be bombarded was either a complete idiocy or
      they simply needed a good reason to convince public to go to war with Japan.
      Even country like Poland in August 29th-30th 1939 did not line up their fighters on airfields. Contrary to popular believe most of the Polish fighters were relocated to smaller and hidden airfields and survived initial Blitzkrieg.

      @CWO:

      As for the part about enlisting the Chinese, I would simply point out that the Chinese spent most of the period from 1937 to 1945 on the losing end of a war with Japan…a country which, when it took on the Russians in the border incident wars of 1938 and 1939 achieved stalemates at best and got trounced at worst.

      That’s okay that Chinese were not very good fighters. Their only purpose would be to open 2nd front which would forces Russians to divert resources from Europe.

      So in the end this would be my plan for invading Russia in 1945:
      A well coordinated invasion of Russia from Eastern Europe, Asia and Pacific led by veteran U.S. troops from Normandy and Italian Campaign. German elite army would have been used as initial strike forces supported by U.S. air force. As the US/German forces would be hitting from the East, the Norwegians would engage in another Winter war. Chinese would hit the Russians in Asia along with U.S. Pacific forces capturing key port cities and lunching bombing raids deep inside Russia. The point would have been to attack Russian on as many fronts as possible. An element of surprise could have been achieved by invading during winter when Russians would least expect. There would be actually an element of advantage for the invading forces since air force is less crippled by cold weather than ground forces. A prolonged bombing raids during winter would cripple Russian supply chain and cause mass starvation of their armies.

      To sum it up, the goal of such invasion would have been:

      1. Paton knocks out Moscow
      2. German army bypass Stalingrad and goes after Oil Fields
      3. U.S. airforce initially criples Russian supply chain
      4. U.S. airforce supplies Paton army and German army with supplies via air
        On Pacific Front
      5. U.S. invades costal cities and lunching bombing missions deep into Russia
      6. Chinese open yet another front

      Yes the downside of invading a large land mass is that it is hard to control. Nevertheless, winter could have been used to allied advantage, along with it’s powerful airforce and the fact that a large land mass when invaded from multiple locations would have been impossible for Russians to defend.

      posted in World War II History
      M
      mattbiernat
    • RE: What if U.S. invaded Soviet Union?

      @CWO:

      Not something that would have happened.  When the Germans signed their first surrender under the supervision of the western Allies (they signed a second one a day later under Soviet supervision), Eisenhower didn’t even enter the room until the German officers had signed the document – and even then, it was only to ask in a cold tone of voice for confirmation that they had done so.  Eisenhower had no sympathies for the Wehrmacht whatsoever (particularly after he had visited one of the liberated Nazi death camps), and he would have been appalled at the idea of teaming up with the army that had fought for Nazi Germany and launching a Germano-American campaign against the Allied country which had defeated Hitler on the Eastern Front.  The idea that he would have participated in such a venture is as much of a fantasy as Himmler’s line in the movie “Downfall” in which has asks an aide, in complete seriousness, “When I meet Eisenhower, should I shake his hand or give the Nazi salute?”  If Himmler had actually tried to see Eisenhower, Ike would have had him arrested on the spot by some MPs without letting him get within half a mile of his office.

      Had Eisehower been informed that Stalin actually killed more people during World War 2 than Hitler, he might have had looked differently.

      I like the point the other members have made, particularly about Japan.
      USA had a lot of troops, equipment, airplanes and naval forces committed to Japan. U.S. could simply use the same strategy against Russia that they did against Japan. 1) capture key port cities using heavy bombardment from battleships 2) land large amount of diehard marines :) 3) use long range bombers to devastate enemy factories. This was the technique that worked against Japan, it worked against “fortress Europe” and it would have worked against Russian industry. Once a country is back in stone age, everything else is a matter of time.

      Another member complained about American public being not very sympathetic. Well, easy solution. Remember Vietnam? Draft everyone ages 18-56 and tell them you are going to free the world of communism. Or…. U.S. could repeat Pearl Harbor but this time with Russians as offenders and wait for 10 million volunteers to show up.

      Also people forget to mention that the Chinese were friendly with USA during WWII. Those guys could have been used as well to hit the Russia from both sides.

      posted in World War II History
      M
      mattbiernat
    • RE: German U-boat found off coast of Massachusetts

      interesting. the U-boats were really close to the coast.

      posted in World War II History
      M
      mattbiernat
    • RE: What if U.S. invaded Soviet Union?

      hmmm interesting 90% of you guys dont’ think it would have been possible. i would like to emphasize that it’s not only the man power that matters but the leadership. read this:

      " Under his leadership… General S. Patton… advanced farther, captured more enemy prisoners, and liberated more territory in less time than any other army in history "

      Truly, I think Patton was the men who would have led U.S. army to capture Moscow, Stalingrad and most of oil rich regions in Russia.  He also wanted to re-arm the German army and sent them against the Russians along with the U.S. troops.

      The supplies would have been a problem. But Russia was also maintained on the U.S. supplies for it’s war effort, so the shortage would have worked both ways.

      posted in World War II History
      M
      mattbiernat
    • RE: Posting Images

      thanks for posting the pictures. nice review.

      posted in Website/Forum Discussion
      M
      mattbiernat
    • What if U.S. invaded Soviet Union?

      Just curious what does everyone else think about this:
      In 1945, after defeating Germany general Paton suggested that U.S. takes out Stalin (after all Stalin killed more people then Hitler… ). Do you guys think that U.S. was capable of invading and controlling Soviet Union for long enough to impose a Democracy?
      One one side: United States:

      • greatest economic power in the world that invaded and defeated both Germany and Japan
      • greatest number of tanks, airplanes, artillery - no other country could match the U.S. production of war equipment
      • 1945, development of better tanks was nearing end
        On the other side: Soviet Union
      • biggest man power in the world
      • hardened and winter trained troops
      • more advanced and better Tanks than USA
      • huge land mass, easy to defend, difficult to conquer

      What do you guys think? What would have happened in 1945. Assuming U.S.A. did not develop atomic bomb.

      posted in World War II History
      M
      mattbiernat
    • Lost here… where do you play A&A

      Hi Guys,
      I love Axis and Allies. But Im lost… all I see is this forum. Where do I play this game???

      posted in General Discussion
      M
      mattbiernat