Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Eclipse
    E
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 0
    • Posts 2
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Eclipse

    @Eclipse

    0
    Reputation
    10
    Profile views
    2
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online
    Age 24

    Eclipse Unfollow Follow

    Latest posts made by Eclipse

    • RE: KIF + KA(nzac)F = Kill Commonwealth First

      @AllyAxis:

      @coolrunner:

      buy a navel base for hainan. Then you can go everywhere from there. And your fleet from japan can reach India in 2 moves with land units. They can also reach most of australia… Then it is easy to defend because of location…

      Minor IC requires a 2 space.  Major a 3.  Hainan has a value of Zero.  No IC can be built.

      Very true.  However, that restriction does not apply to Naval Bases or Airbases.  They can be built on any territory provided it was not captured that turn.  Naval Bases have the added restriction that they must be built on a territory with a coastline or on an island (obviously).

      Personally, the Hainan island Naval Base is always in my J1 purchase and I usually consolidate the entire fleet there J1.  It forces an a very defensive build for UK(pacific) and forces them to consolidate everything to protect Calcutta.  It also makes for a great naval “triangle” between Hainan, Japan and the Carolines.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      E
      Eclipse
    • RE: Sea Lion: Is it worth it?!?!?!

      In a word - No.  I’ve tried Sea Lion several times and the only time it was worth it, the UK player didn’t see it coming and didn’t defend against it (those really don’t count).

      In the games where the UK player was not caught by surprise, Germany was successful in taking London but was left with a minimal ground force (usually only a tank or two).  The UK income was great, but did little to offset the 11+ transport loads of land units that were eliminated, not to mention aircraft casualties in the battle for London.  All those transports ended up being a big waste overall.  It became very difficult to defend London from a US liberation AND push hard against Russia who started out on the offensive - neither of which was helped by having a stack of transports.  Sure, they were great for taking Leningrad, but most turns they sat unused.

      I think the biggest problems with Sea Lion are the timing issues and two-front war it creates.  Taking London immediately brings the USA into the war and eliminates a large chunk of Germany’s ground forces.  By the time Germany builds up an invasion force for Russia, the USA shows up ready to liberate London and/or France.  This not only creates a two-front war, it also creates a situation where units on one front are not very useful on the other front.

      Faking Sea Lion initially and using the G1 naval build to jump start Barbarossa has been the most effective strategy for me so far.  With a well played Italy, Germany can crush Russia before the USA can liberate Paris.  It is a close race, but very winnable for the Axis, especially if the USA focuses on the Pacific too much.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      E
      Eclipse