Suggested Topics

Tutor game: AndrewAAGamer (X) vs trulpen [and everyone else] (A+50) OOB
Play Boardgames • • trulpen

51

0
Votes

51
Posts

235
Views

I have posted my essay on Warfare Principles of Axis & Allies. I hope this helps you to win more games! Except against me of course. https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/35286/warfare-principles-of-axis-allies-by-andrewaagamer
Warfare Principles of Axis & Allies (By AndrewAAGamer)
Axis & Allies Global 1940 • • AndrewAAGamer

8

0
Votes

8
Posts

2
Views

Global 1940 2nd Edition OOB - The Beginning Learning Guide Let’s move from talking about general Warfare Principles to Global 1940 itself. Oh, by the way I am not going to be talking about gambits or odd play. What we want to achieve is consistent play to win as many games as possible. Gambits do not fall into that category because either a) they require the opponent to not have seen the gambit before or react poorly to it to be successful or b) have low overall odds of success. We want to win every time! Not some of the time. In addition, this general overarching discussion is regarding strategy, not tactics. So, open the Global 1940 Board and what do we see? As usual the Axis have centralized position. The Axis have greater firepower to begin the game. The Axis have the initiative; they will be the ones to determine the overall battlegrounds of the game. The Allies have more territory and money initially. What this means is the Axis will be trying to win the game and the Allies will be doing their best to slow them down, then hopefully stop them, and then push them back for an ultimate Allied victory. WINNING THE GAME: There is no argument that the Axis has the advantage in Global 1940 2nd Edition OOB. This is due to two factors. The Axis only need to win on one side of the board to win the game. If we want a balanced game where either faction wins half of the time then the Axis can only have a one third of a chance of winning the game on either side of the board. NOTE: It is easier for the Axis to win on the Europe side of the board than the Pacific side of the board. The Axis have five scenarios that can lead to winning. • Germany takes Moscow. • Germany takes London. • Italy gets big in the Mediterranean. • Japan wins in the Pacific. • The game develops into a long-term money game and the Axis prevail due to collecting the same or more money than the Allies. For the Allies to win they must stop the Axis on both sides of the board by stopping all five of their scenarios. Just one is enough for the Axis to win but it takes all five to make the Allies happy. The key for the Allies is to put more pressure on one side of the board to gain an advantage while stalling the other side of the board. This balancing act is easier said than done. As one of my gaming group members once said, “Axis and Allies is like a balloon; if you push too hard in one area it bulges in another.” GERMANY GOES FOR MOSCOW Germany starts with enough units on the board, and quickly gains enough money to buy additional units, that Germany can take down Moscow. Once Moscow falls the Germans push to Egypt and the game is over. Unfortunately, there is no way to stop the Germans from taking Moscow without giving the game to the Axis elsewhere. The key issues for the Allies are a) how long does it take and b) how much does it cost. Losing Moscow does not lose the Allies the game. Losing Moscow too cheaply or too quickly does as it makes the fall of Cairo inevitable. The Allied defense is fourfold. 1) Knowing it is a main target Russia builds and acts accordingly; buying tons of infantry and harboring every unit for the final Moscow battle. 2) Assistance in the form of UK units come to Moscow via the Middle East to delay the inevitable. 3) An Allied fleet reduces German reinforcements aimed for Moscow by attacking the Atlantic Wall. 4) The Allies prepare a defense of the Middle East and Egypt so that once Moscow falls the Axis still cannot win the game. This is the most difficult winning scenario the Allies face. GERMANY GOES FOR LONDON Personally, this is the one scenario I love to see the Axis try as the Allies. The reasons being are it is a) a lot easier for the Allies to come back from the fall of London than it is the fall of Moscow and b) unlike Moscow once the Allies see the Germans going for London the Germans have a limited window of Opportunity to take London. Also, it is easier to defend London than Moscow because the Germans need to build and protect their transport fleet to be able to move their ground units against London. The key for the Allies here is to not lose London on the cheap. It must cost the Germans a ton of money and units so even once it falls the Germans are in a weak position because the Bear of Russia is going to come knocking on the door. Surprisingly enough once Russia gets into German territory they collect more money than Germany does. Ouch. As long as the Allies to not leave London weak this is not the scenario to worry about. ITALY GETS THE MEDITERRANEAN If Italy gains control of the Mediterranean then the Axis will be collecting too much money and will overpower the Allies. This is the easiest way for the Axis to win but luckily it is also the easiest scenario for the Allies to stop. Once UK blows up the Italian fleet in the Med, kills the Italian ground troops in Africa and convoy disrupts SZ97 the Italians are basically removed from the game. JAPAN WINS IN THE PACIFIC Though Japan is surrounded by four enemies and has far less income than the four combined Japan can become a monster if left unchecked. For Japan taking India and China is not that difficult. And, as before, the Allies strategy is forcing Japan to spend time and cash accomplishing those goals so that by the time they turn to go for Sydney or Hawaii they are now contained by a large US Fleet. AXIS COLLECTS ENOUGH MONEY TO WIN LONG-TERM The final scenario for the Axis comes about when the Allies have performed admirably and have stopped the previous four game winning scenarios. However, the Axis was still able to take enough territory to be close to or even with or, heaven forbid, ahead of the money the Allies are collecting. That is bad news for the Allies. Due to their centralized position and for the most part more efficient use of Land Units and Air Units versus Naval units the Axis do not need to be collecting the same or more than the Allies to win. The Allies need to be ahead by about $10 a Round. If that is the case they are winning a long-term money game and if not, they are losing. ROLES OF THE POWERS So, what does each Nation or Power have to do to be successful? What is their role in the game? AXIS: Win the game by achieving one of their five scenarios… GERMANY is the main antagonist on the Europe side of the board. It is up to them to win the game. As a land centric Power, with lots of money available to them in the east, typically their goal is to take Moscow and then drive for Egypt. They must defend their coastline from Allied Landings to maintain their income and to deprive the Allies of the opportunity of getting France back into the game. Or even worse losing Berlin. JAPAN all by herself in the Pacific, will either try to win the game, if the US ignores it too much, or be a constant irritant forcing the US to spend monies in the Pacific that they desperately want to be spending in the Atlantic. While outnumberd Japan can knock out one or two of its opponents and become sizable if the Allies are not careful. ITALY is the weak sister of Germany. In fact, every true German wishes Italy was just more German territory to feed more income to German Factories and remove the dreaded possibility of Rome falling to the Allies. Normally Italy’s role is reduced to defending German and Italian territory and producing some limited can openers on the march to Moscow and Cairo. It is not unusual for Italy to be doing everything it can just not to be taken. Played correctly by the British Italy should be a non-factor in the game. ALLIES: Win the game by pressuring one side of the board more than the other to gain an advantage on one side while stalling on the other side… RUSSIA is the main target of the Axis. Thus, they need to play defensively unless the Germans go for Sealion. The longer Russia lasts, and the more money it collects and puts down in troops, gives the Allies time to gain advantages elsewhere on the board and be ready to repel the Germans once Moscow finally falls. USA is the key to the game for the Allies. How and where the US spends their money is the difference maker. The US will collect more money than any other Allied Power and unlike every other Allied power its capital is safe from the Axis. Depending on Allied strategy the US will either a) go all out in the Atlantic for a few Turns then turn its full attention towards the Pacific, b) go 100% into the Pacific for many Turns to rout the Japanese and then turn towards Europe or c) have some balance between the two sides of the board. CHINA is one of the minor Powers that has a lot of importance in the game. Its role is to kill Japanese ground troops. While it cannot stand against a concerted Japanese effort the more troops it kills the harder it is for Japan in the Pacific. UK has the toughest job in the game as it is the closest Power to Germany, so it must protect its Capital, knock Italy out of the game, assist Russia in the defense of Moscow, distract Germany and protect the Middle East from Germany. Simple right? Job one, after defending London, is taking Italy out of the game by taking control of the Med, Middle East and Africa. Once that is accomplished it can move on to reinforcing Moscow and start landings on the Atlantic Wall. But Italy comes first! The benefit of playing UK is at least you know what they need to do. ANZAC is the other minor Power that plays a big role. ANZAC is the death by a thousand cuts for Japan. Making them trade the Money Islands and acting as US Fleet blockers. ANZAC’s job is to force Japan to spend money on them so the US can concentrate on getting a superior fleet versus Japan’s. FRANCE is, well, ummm… does not really have a role in this game except to die on G1. Remember as the Allies all you are trying to do is slow the Axis down, kill as many of their units as you can, so that when they come for the final push your money advantage overwhelms them. GERMANY 1 (G1) As I mentioned earlier it is important for the Allies to recognize what the Axis is doing to be able to counter it. Since Germany is the main antagonist here are some prime examples of G1 options: • 100% ground unit buy for Germany. The Germans are going to go for Moscow on G6, G7 or G8. • Major IC in Romania. The Germans are going for Moscow on G6. • Carrier and two transports in SZ112 or SZ113. The Germans are going for Sealion. • Submarine, destroyer and carrier in SZ112. The Germans may be going for Sealion though more likely they are building a fleet to contest the British and fight for the Med. This is more a long-term strategy than a short-term strategy. TAKING YOUR TURN Here are the four steps to consider when you prepare to take your Turn: First and foremost, always look to see if your capital is safe. What can the enemy do to you this Turn and the next Turn? No matter how important some other objective is if you fail to protect your capital you just messed up. Are there one or more VIP areas that must be taken or protected to protect my capital down the road or to achieve my main objective? As part of my main objective what can I do to the enemy and what do I need to buy to accomplish it? Are there any attacks of opportunity that, while not part of my main objective, assist me in accomplishing my main objective? As tempting as it may be, any attack that does not assist in accomplishing your main objective, should be ignored. THE BID As discussed, the Axis has the advantage in Global 1940 2nd Edition OOB; significantly. How much of a bid the Allies receive is up to each Player’s desire to be the Axis or the Allies. Whatever amount the bid is, it should be used to accomplish the Allied goals of slowing the Axis down and making life more difficult for the Axis and to assist the Allies in accomplishing their own goals. Bids should be used to: Protect the British Fleet – as I already said ships cost a lot and saving ships means not having to buy them later. Protecting the UK fleet not only makes it easier for the British to fight for the Med and make Atlantic Wall landings later it also protects London. Any bid placement should include a fighter for Scotland and a submarine for either SZ 111 or SZ 110. (Mandatory) Taking Italy out of the game is job #1 and a submarine in SZ 98 to maximize Taranto assists in that. (Mandatory) Ground troops for taking out Italians units in Africa or a transport in SZ 71 to do the same. Submarine or destroyer in SZ 91 to defend the UK Cruiser and assist in the attack on SZ 96. Infantry in India/West India/Burma to bolster defense. Or a Mech in Burma to threaten FIC on UK1 if the Japanese do a J1 declaration of war. Submarine in SZ 62 to protect the transport. Infantry in Russia to defend Moscow. An artillery in Amur to pin more Japanese troops in Manchuria. I hope you learned something reading this paper. The goal was to highlight key points regarding how to play Global 1940 that will help you win more games.
L20 Surfer (L+34) v. AndrewAAGamer (X) G40 2nd Ed. OOB
League • • surfer

39

0
Votes

39
Posts

90
Views

Sorry about the edit. But I’d rather NCM my Russian Far East Forces to Amur
Find League Opponents Thread
League • • JDOW

665

0
Votes

665
Posts

15310
Views

E

@AndrewAAGamer I"m down for a game with the rules you are requesting.
L20 Gamerman01 (L) vs AetV (w/o Iwo NO)
League • • aequitas-et-veritas

35

0
Votes

35
Posts

68
Views

…have to do
G

League General Discussion Thread
League • • gamerman01

565

0
Votes

565
Posts

10742
Views

Just my $0.02. I was on a path to work up the ladder then work got in the way in 2019…so here I’m am again in 2020. Mostly I like the league scoring and it is a very strong indicator of the system’s validity that the best players are the highest rated players each year. So let’s not muck with the system too much. The main detractor is that it significantly penalizes top-tier players from playing anyone less. I saw this first hand as I was waiting to play and top-tier players were not willing to damage their scores–I get it. The suggestion that you play low-vs-high tier games in the non-league forum has some merit, but 2 cons: a) It’s not a league game so the desire to win is not as great b) These games take alot of time to play, especially if you want to have 8+ games year and not interfere with real life (work, family, etc.) So I can’t imagine a top-tier player wanting to spend much time on games that don’t count. If you have the time, great go for it. Everyone else doesn’t (possible exception due to COVID-19…boo) So what’s my suggested modification? Allow 1 game between players 3+ tiers apart (M-2or3, or E-3) to count each year subject to the following adapted scoring: a) For the higher ranked person If they win, the game counts as being played towards the 8 games for playoff, but there is no score, i.e whatever their average was before the game, that’s their average after the game. If they lose, the game counts but the loss is considered to a player 2 tiers lower than their level (M= loss to tier 1 = 2pts, E= loss to tier 2 = 1 pt). b) For the lower ranked person. Standard league scoring in effect. Rationale: The main goal here is purely personal–as a possibly upcoming new player, I’d like to see games against better players to improve my game. But also as @AndrewAAGamer said, its better for the league – as in making it more competitive, if everyone gets to learn from the better players. I think with this mod, if a higher player is looking for a new game, they will seriously consider playing lower ranked players. I set the one game limit between any pair of players to allow more players to interact in the low-vs-high games. Every one may want a piece of the Master, and this way a few more might get the opportunity. Caveat: The current scoring algorithm constantly updates ranking based upon the wins/loses of your opponents. This could cause a problem in determining if a game should be a “normal” match or a high-low game once all games are tallied at the end of the year. There is also a possible ambiguous situation that could occur if a low ranked player gets “lucky”. viz. 2 players each play 8 games for the year. One was E tier the year before, the other had no record. The E-tier player plays 4 games against E level goes 2-2 (avg=5.00) and has 4 low tier games (Tier 3) that he wins – no score, but his average stays at 5.00 and he remains a solid E tier player. All good. Now the new player plays 4 games against Tier 3 and wins avg=4.00 and 4 games against tier E players. He a good player but lucky dice help him to 2-2 record. avg = 5.00. So his avg for the year is 4.5, which would also classify as E (barely), but would place him out of the top 8, no playoff, (based on 2019 results). Again, I think most everyone would be good with this. Here’s the rub. For the algorithm, these players have identical records 2-2 vs E and 4-0 vs Tier 3. How to differentiate them? The solution would be to use the prior year’s rank to determine if you are playing a high-low game or normal scoring. This is also important to make this work because if a M-tier player was really on board with this and gave 4 games to new players, who at the time were Tier 2 or 3, but by the end of the year had worked their way into Tier 1 status. Suddenly, that player will see his avg change as those 4 games would now be (wins?) against 4 Tier 1 players under normal scoring rules (6pts). Might not really be a problem as only 2 people had 6.0+ avg for 2019, but I would not want to be the reason to muck up the higher orders. Lastly, using last years ranking would simply coding the scoring. Quick check at records to see how to score, rather than iterative examination of everyone’s ranking. Other constraints
I

ironfish (GE/IT) & TigerAce1944 (JP) vs erinmores (Allies) plus tech
Play Boardgames • • Ironfish

68

0
Votes

68
Posts

69
Views

E

TripleA Turn Summary: UK_Pacific round 7 TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 2nd Edition, version: 4.0 Game History Round: 7 Purchase Units - Americans Americans buy 3 artilleries, 1 destroyer, 1 factory_minor, 2 fighters, 3 infantry and 3 transports; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - Americans 1 infantry moved from Norway to Finland 1 bomber moved from United Kingdom to Finland 1 armour moved from Norway to Finland 1 bomber moved from United Kingdom to Western Germany 1 artillery and 5 infantry moved from Central United States to 101 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 5 infantry and 3 transports moved from 101 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 5 infantry moved from 91 Sea Zone to Morocco 1 fighter moved from Gibraltar to Morocco 2 fighters moved from 91 Sea Zone to Morocco Combat - Americans Strategic bombing raid in Western Germany AA fire in Western Germany : 1/1 hits, 0.17 expected hits 1 bomber killed by AA Bombing raid in Western Germany causes 0 damage total. Battle in Morocco Americans attack with 1 artillery, 3 fighters and 5 infantry Italians defend with 1 artillery and 3 infantry Americans roll dice for 1 artillery, 3 fighters and 5 infantry in Morocco, round 2 : 2/9 hits, 3.33 expected hits Italians roll dice for 1 artillery and 3 infantry in Morocco, round 2 : 0/4 hits, 1.33 expected hits 2 infantry owned by the Italians lost in Morocco Americans roll dice for 1 artillery, 3 fighters and 5 infantry in Morocco, round 3 : 3/9 hits, 3.33 expected hits Italians roll dice for 1 artillery and 1 infantry in Morocco, round 3 : 1/2 hits, 0.67 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Americans, 1 artillery owned by the Italians and 1 infantry owned by the Italians lost in Morocco Americans win, taking Morocco from Italians with 1 artillery, 3 fighters and 4 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 10 Casualties for Italians: 1 artillery and 3 infantry Casualties for Americans: 1 infantry Battle in Finland Americans attack with 1 armour, 1 bomber and 1 infantry Germans defend with 1 infantry Americans roll dice for 1 armour, 1 bomber and 1 infantry in Finland, round 2 : 1/3 hits, 1.33 expected hits Germans roll dice for 1 infantry in Finland, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Germans and 1 infantry owned by the Americans lost in Finland Americans win, taking Finland from Germans with 1 armour and 1 bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 0 Casualties for Americans: 1 infantry Casualties for Germans: 1 infantry Non Combat Move - Americans 1 bomber moved from Finland to Norway 2 transports moved from 110 Sea Zone to 102 Sea Zone 1 transport moved from 112 Sea Zone to 110 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from United Kingdom to Norway 1 carrier and 2 fighters moved from 91 Sea Zone to 112 Sea Zone 1 armour moved from Gibraltar to 91 Sea Zone 2 artilleries moved from Gibraltar to 91 Sea Zone 3 infantry moved from Gibraltar to 91 Sea Zone 1 armour, 2 artilleries, 1 carrier, 3 infantry and 3 transports moved from 91 Sea Zone to 112 Sea Zone 1 armour, 2 artilleries and 3 infantry moved from 112 Sea Zone to Norway 1 fighter moved from Eastern United States to 101 Sea Zone 1 carrier and 1 fighter moved from 101 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Morocco to 91 Sea Zone 2 fighters moved from Morocco to Gibraltar 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Western United States to 10 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 8 Sea Zone to 10 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 10 Sea Zone to 30 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 30 Sea Zone to Johnston Island 2 battleships, 3 carriers, 3 cruisers, 3 destroyers, 6 fighters and 1 submarine moved from 33 Sea Zone to 19 Sea Zone 2 submarines moved from 20 Sea Zone to 19 Sea Zone 2 fighters and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Caroline Islands to Okinawa Place Units - Americans 1 destroyer and 3 transports placed in 101 Sea Zone 3 artilleries and 3 infantry placed in Central United States 2 fighters placed in Eastern United States 1 factory_minor placed in Norway Turn Complete - Americans Americans collect 60 PUs; end with 60 PUs Objective Americans 1 Homeland: Americans met a national objective for an additional 10 PUs; end with 70 PUs Objective Americans 3 Defense Obligations: Americans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 75 PUs Objective Americans 4 Philippines: Americans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 80 PUs Purchase Units - Chinese Trigger Chinese Artillery Supplies: Chinese has their production frontier changed to: productionChinese_Burma_Road_Open Chinese buy 2 artilleries and 1 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - Chinese 1 artillery moved from Hunan to Kweichow 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 4 infantry moved from Yunnan to Kweichow 1 infantry moved from Szechwan to Kweichow Combat - Chinese Battle in Kweichow Chinese attack with 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 5 infantry Japanese defend with 1 armour, 1 artillery and 3 mech_infantrys Chinese roll dice for 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 5 infantry in Kweichow, round 2 : 2/8 hits, 2.33 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 armour, 1 artillery and 3 mech_infantrys in Kweichow, round 2 : 1/5 hits, 1.83 expected hits 2 mech_infantrys owned by the Japanese and 1 infantry owned by the Chinese lost in Kweichow Chinese roll dice for 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 4 infantry in Kweichow, round 3 : 4/7 hits, 2.17 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 armour, 1 artillery and 1 mech_infantry in Kweichow, round 3 : 0/3 hits, 1.17 expected hits 1 mech_infantry owned by the Japanese, 1 artillery owned by the Japanese and 1 armour owned by the Japanese lost in Kweichow Chinese win, taking Kweichow from Japanese with 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 4 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 19 Casualties for Chinese: 1 infantry Casualties for Japanese: 1 armour, 1 artillery and 3 mech_infantrys Non Combat Move - Chinese 1 fighter moved from Kweichow to Yunnan Place Units - Chinese 1 artillery and 1 infantry placed in Szechwan 1 artillery placed in Yunnan Turn Complete - Chinese Chinese collect 5 PUs; end with 5 PUs Objective Chinese 1 Burma Road: Chinese met a national objective for an additional 6 PUs; end with 11 PUs Purchase Units - British British buy 1 armour, 1 destroyer, 1 fighter and 1 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Purchase Units - UK_Pacific UK_Pacific buy 1 armour and 4 mech_infantrys; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - British 1 armour and 1 mech_infantry moved from Yunnan to Anhwe 1 tactical_bomber moved from Burma to Anhwe 1 mech_infantry moved from Kwangsi to Kiangsi Chinese take Kiangsi from Japanese 1 mech_infantry moved from Yunnan to Anhwe 11 fighters moved from Russia to Ukraine Combat - British Battle in Anhwe British attack with 1 armour, 2 mech_infantrys and 1 tactical_bomber Japanese defend with 1 artillery and 1 infantry British roll dice for 1 armour, 2 mech_infantrys and 1 tactical_bomber in Anhwe, round 2 : 2/4 hits, 1.50 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 artillery and 1 infantry in Anhwe, round 2 : 2/2 hits, 0.67 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Japanese, 1 artillery owned by the Japanese and 2 mech_infantrys owned by the British lost in Anhwe British win, taking Anhwe from Japanese with 1 armour and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is -1 Casualties for British: 2 mech_infantrys Casualties for Japanese: 1 artillery and 1 infantry Battle in Ukraine British attack with 11 fighters Germans defend with 3 armour and 1 factory_minor British roll dice for 11 fighters in Ukraine, round 2 : 5/11 hits, 5.50 expected hits Germans roll dice for 3 armour in Ukraine, round 2 : 1/3 hits, 1.50 expected hits 3 armour owned by the Germans and 1 fighter owned by the British lost in Ukraine British win with 10 fighters remaining. Battle score for attacker is 8 Casualties for British: 1 fighter Casualties for Germans: 3 armour Non Combat Move - British 10 fighters moved from Ukraine to Russia 3 fighters moved from Persia to Russia 1 battleship, 1 carrier, 2 cruisers and 1 transport moved from 81 Sea Zone to 80 Sea Zone 1 transport moved from 72 Sea Zone to 80 Sea Zone 1 mech_infantry moved from Belgian Congo to Anglo Egyptian Sudan 1 aaGun moved from Yunnan to Kweichow 2 infantry moved from Yunnan to Kweichow 2 infantry moved from Yunnan to Szechwan 1 infantry moved from Yunnan to Hunan 1 infantry moved from Yunnan to Hunan 1 aaGun and 1 infantry moved from Burma to Yunnan 2 mech_infantrys moved from India to Eastern Persia 1 armour and 2 mech_infantrys moved from India to Yunnan 1 destroyer moved from 110 Sea Zone to 112 Sea Zone 1 destroyer moved from 45 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone 1 tactical_bomber moved from Anhwe to Yunnan Place Units - British 1 armour, 1 fighter and 1 infantry placed in Persia 1 destroyer placed in 110 Sea Zone Turn Complete - British Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 3 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 119 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,6 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 98 Sea Zone. Rolls: 6,2,4,1 British collect 27 PUs (3 lost to blockades); end with 27 PUs Place Units - UK_Pacific 1 armour and 4 mech_infantrys placed in India Turn Complete - UK_Pacific UK_Pacific collect 22 PUs; end with 22 PUs Some Units in India change ownership: 1 armour and 4 mech_infantrys Combat Hit Differential Summary : Germans : 0.17 Italians : -1.00 British : 0.00 AA fire in Western Germany : : 0.83 Americans : -2.00 Chinese : 1.50 Japanese : -0.67 Savegame
P

Dutchman vs Pejon_88 BM3
Play Boardgames • • Pejon_88

193

0
Votes

193
Posts

829
Views

P

Do not worry about it. Yes, I believe so. If you enjoy this game you should take a look at the League. There are a lot of different ranked players so everyone can play competitively. Good luck!

Posts made by Felix