Buy
2 TP 14)
5 inf (15)
save (2)

CM:
1 ifn Gbr to Nor

NCM:
1 bom Bra to Gbr

Mob Units
1 TP SZ5
4 inf 2 arm Gbr

Collect Income
25+5+2=32 IPC

OBG_vs_cts17_Gm2_07dGBR.AAM

Buy
3 TP (21)
3 inf (9)
3 arm (15)
save (3)

CM:
none

NCM:
3 inf Wca to Eca
2 inf 1 art 2 arm Eus to Eca
4 TP SZ10 to SZ1
1 TP 1 DD SZ8 to SZ7

Mob Units
1 inf Chi
3 inf 3 arm Eus
3 TP SZ10

Collect Income
38+10+3=51 IPC

cts17 vs. JWW 2fUSA.AAM

Drop 2 CV, 2 fig.

1 CV, 1 SS 1 fig

Buy
10 inf

CM:
1 inf Eve to Yak

NCM:
1 inf Ura to Eve
7 inf 1 art 1 bom Cau to Rus
3 arm Ind to Cau
2 fig SZ4 to Rus
2 CV 2 fig SZ4 to SZ6

Mob Units
6 inf Rus
4 inf Cau

Collect Income
19+5=24 IPC

OBG_vs_cts17_Gm2_07bRus.AAM

@Ol’:

@cts17:

I guess I can take advantage of your lack of transports though

Take advantage or fall into trap??? I think…the first  :oops:

I’m drawing on the basis that your trap isn’t strong enough that I can’t counter it. Still trying to decide whether you calling a bluff or acting impassively will be worse.

I guess I can take advantage of your lack of transports though

Buy
4 SS (24)
2 bom (24)
save (1)

CM:
1 inf Ala to Iwo
CHI 1 inf Yun to Fuk
1 inf Hup to Kia

NCM:
2 bom 3 fig Wus to Mid
1 bom Haw to Mid
1 inf Ala to Wak
1 SS 3 CV 6 fig SZ58 to SZ59
3 inf 1 art Ala to Haw

Mob Units
4 SS SZ56
2 bom Wus
CHI 1 inf Hup
1 inf Nin

Collect Income
38+10+1=49 IPC

OBG_vs_cts17_Gm2_06fUSA.AAM

lol I guess I should make up my mind, though

NCM:
1 bom Lib to Gbr
3 inf 1 art 1 AA Per to Trj
2 inf Rho to Cng
1 fig Lib to SZ7
1 fig 2 CV 1 DD 1 TP SZ8 to SZ7
1 fig SZ8 to Gbr
1 DD SZ2 to SZ7
1 DD 1 TP SZ43 to SZ22

Mob Units
3 inf 1 art 1 fig Gbr
2 TP SZ7

Collect Income
30 IPC

cts17 vs. JWW 2dGBr.AAM

Buy
2 TP (14)
3 inf (9)
1 art (4)
1 fig (10)
save (0)

CM:
1 inf 1 arm Eca to Nwe
5 inf 2 art 1 arm 1 fig 1 bom Egy to Lib

Combat;
Lib
att 5 inf 2 art 1 arm 1 fig 1 bom
Rolls: 3@1 4@2 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 53@1: (1, 1, 4)4@2: (5, 1, 5, 4)2@3: (5, 1)1@4: (2)
def 1 inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)