Suggested Topics

T

1914 Balanced, TGC (CP) vs Ragnell804 (Entente)

Play Boardgames
• • • The_Good_Captain

46

0
Votes

46
Posts

318
Views

R

@The_Good_Captain

Game History
Round: 6 Purchase Units - Americans Americans buy 7 infantry; Remaining resources: 1 PUs; Combat Move - Americans 1 cruiser moved from SZ 16 to SZ 19 6 infantry moved from United States of America to Canada 3 transports moved from SZ 14 to SZ 2 2 artilleries and 6 infantry moved from Morocco to SZ 14 6 infantry moved from Morocco to Algeria 2 artilleries, 4 infantry and 3 transports moved from SZ 14 to SZ 17 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from SZ 14 to SZ 16 2 infantry moved from SZ 16 to Marseilles 2 artilleries and 4 infantry moved from SZ 17 to Piedmont Combat Move - Americans Place Units - Americans 7 infantry placed in United States of America Turn Complete - Americans Americans collect 20 PUs; end with 21 PUs
Combat Hit Differential Summary :

ITUS6.tsvg
F

What To Do With Minor Axis Infantry In A&A Stalingrad

Axis & Allies Stalingrad
• stalingrad • • FranceNeedsMorePower

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

35
Views

P

Locked as duplicate of
https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/41942/what-is-the-purpose-of-minor-axis-infantry-in-stalingrad
P

Axis and Allies Stalingrad

News
• stalingrad • • PGsquig

10

2
Votes

10
Posts

2.7k
Views

P

We now have a dedicated forum category for Axis & Allies Stalingrad:

https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/category/73/axis-allies-stalingrad
M

L25 OOB Martin (X) vs. Knusperheinz (L+50)

League
• • • Martin

52

0
Votes

52
Posts

585
Views

K

@Martin

41957-oob-round-04-anzac.tsvg

41957-oob-round-04-france.tsvg

Game History
Round: 4 Purchase Units - ANZAC ANZAC buy 1 infantry and 2 submarines; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - ANZAC Non Combat Move - ANZAC 1 artillery moved from New South Wales to 62 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from New South Wales to 62 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 62 Sea Zone to 33 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from 33 Sea Zone to Caroline Islands 1 artillery moved from 33 Sea Zone to Caroline Islands Place Units - ANZAC 1 infantry placed in New South Wales 2 submarines placed in 62 Sea Zone Turn Complete - ANZAC ANZAC collect 10 PUs; end with 10 PUs Trigger ANZAC 1 Control Original And Malaya: ANZAC met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 15 PUs Combat Move - French Turn Complete - French Combat Hit Differential Summary :
K

Karl7 vs CANADA FOOLS

Team Games
• • • Karl7

365

0
Votes

365
Posts

17.3k
Views

C

TripleA Turn Summary: Japanese round 11
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3

Game History
Round: 11 Purchase Units - Japanese Japanese buy 1 artillery, 4 destroyers, 3 fighters, 3 infantry and 1 transport; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 6 SuicideAttackTokens; Combat Move - Japanese 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 42 Sea Zone to 20 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 20 Sea Zone to Kwangtung 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Malaya to 37 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 37 Sea Zone to 19 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 19 Sea Zone to Shantung 1 destroyer and 1 submarine moved from 35 Sea Zone to 34 Sea Zone 2 bombers moved from Java to 34 Sea Zone 1 destroyer moved from 6 Sea Zone to 19 Sea Zone 1 destroyer moved from 36 Sea Zone to 20 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from 37 Sea Zone to India 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Kwangsi to Kwangtung 1 fighter moved from Korea to 19 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Japan to Shantung 1 tactical_bomber moved from 36 Sea Zone to 34 Sea Zone 1 tactical_bomber moved from 37 Sea Zone to Kwangtung 1 marine moved from Java to 42 Sea Zone 1 battleship and 1 marine moved from 42 Sea Zone to 61 Sea Zone 1 marine moved from 61 Sea Zone to South Australia 2 artilleries and 2 infantry moved from Java to 42 Sea Zone 2 artilleries, 2 infantry and 2 transports moved from 42 Sea Zone to 56 Sea Zone 2 artilleries and 2 infantry moved from 56 Sea Zone to Western Australia 1 fighter moved from Japan to 19 Sea Zone 2 fighters moved from Japan to 20 Sea Zone Combat - Japanese Battle in Western Australia Battle in South Australia Battle in 34 Sea Zone Japanese attack with 2 bombers, 1 destroyer, 1 submarine and 1 tactical_bomber ANZAC defend with 1 destroyer Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 34 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 2 bombers, 1 destroyer and 1 tactical_bomber in 34 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/4 hits, 2.17 expected hits ANZAC roll dice for 1 destroyer in 34 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 destroyer owned by the ANZAC lost in 34 Sea Zone Japanese win, taking Western Australia from ANZAC, taking South Australia from ANZAC with 2 bombers, 1 destroyer, 1 submarine and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 8 Casualties for ANZAC: 1 destroyer Battle in 19 Sea Zone Japanese attack with 1 destroyer, 2 fighters, 1 submarine and 1 transport Americans defend with 1 submarine and 1 transport Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 19 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 destroyer, 2 fighters and 1 transport in 19 Sea Zone, round 2 : 3/3 hits, 1.33 expected hits Americans roll dice for 1 submarine in 19 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.17 expected hits Americans roll dice for 1 transport in 19 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/0 hits, 0.00 expected hits 1 submarine owned by the Japanese lost in 19 Sea Zone 1 submarine owned by the Americans and 1 transport owned by the Americans lost in 19 Sea Zone 1 infantry owned by the Americans lost in Shantung Japanese win with 1 destroyer, 2 fighters and 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7 Casualties for Japanese: 1 submarine Casualties for Americans: 1 submarine and 1 transport Battle in 20 Sea Zone Japanese attack with 1 destroyer, 2 fighters, 1 submarine and 1 transport Americans defend with 1 submarine Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 20 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 destroyer, 2 fighters and 1 transport in 20 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/3 hits, 1.33 expected hits Americans roll dice for 1 submarine in 20 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.17 expected hits 1 submarine owned by the Americans lost in 20 Sea Zone Japanese win with 1 destroyer, 2 fighters, 1 submarine and 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is 6 Casualties for Americans: 1 submarine Battle in Shantung Japanese attack with 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 1 infantry Japanese win, taking Shantung from Chinese with 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 1 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 3 Casualties for Americans: 1 infantry Battle in Kwangtung Japanese attack with 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 1 infantry and 2 tactical_bombers Americans defend with 1 factory_minor, 1 harbour and 1 infantry Japanese roll dice for 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 1 infantry and 2 tactical_bombers in Kwangtung, round 2 : 2/5 hits, 2.33 expected hits Americans roll dice for 1 infantry in Kwangtung, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Japanese lost in Kwangtung 1 infantry owned by the Americans lost in Kwangtung Japanese win, taking Kwangtung from Americans with 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 2 tactical_bombers remaining. Battle score for attacker is 0 Casualties for Japanese: 1 infantry Casualties for Americans: 1 infantry Non Combat Move - Japanese 1 fighter moved from 19 Sea Zone to Kwangsi 1 fighter moved from 19 Sea Zone to Korea 1 fighter moved from Shantung to Okinawa 1 fighter moved from 20 Sea Zone to Kwangsi 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Kwangtung to India 1 tactical_bomber moved from Kwangtung to Kwangsi 1 bomber moved from 34 Sea Zone to Kwangsi 1 tactical_bomber moved from 34 Sea Zone to Philippines 1 bomber moved from 34 Sea Zone to Kwangsi 1 destroyer moved from 42 Sea Zone to 46 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from 20 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 42 Sea Zone to 56 Sea Zone 1 carrier moved from 37 Sea Zone to 42 Sea Zone 1 carrier moved from 42 Sea Zone to 61 Sea Zone 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 42 Sea Zone to 61 Sea Zone 2 carriers moved from 42 Sea Zone to 56 Sea Zone 2 fighters and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 42 Sea Zone to 56 Sea Zone 1 tactical_bomber moved from 42 Sea Zone to 56 Sea Zone 1 cruiser moved from 42 Sea Zone to 56 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 36 Sea Zone to 42 Sea Zone 1 battleship, 2 carriers, 1 cruiser, 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 42 Sea Zone to 56 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 42 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone Place Units - Japanese 1 transport placed in 37 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry placed in Malaya 3 fighters placed in India 3 destroyers placed in 36 Sea Zone 1 destroyer placed in 6 Sea Zone 2 infantry placed in Japan Turn Complete - Japanese Japanese collect 69 PUs; end with 69 PUs Objective Japanese 4 Control Dutch East Indies: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 74 PUs Objective Japanese 3 Control Honolulu Or Sydney Or Calcutta Or Western United States: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 79 PUs
Combat Hit Differential Summary :
Americans regular : 1.33 Japanese regular : -1.17 ANZAC regular : -0.33
Savegame
D

Gen Con 2025 - AAR

Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
• • • DoManMacgee

9

2
Votes

9
Posts

232
Views

D

@PizzaPete said in Gen Con 2025 - AAR:

I’m very curious to see how the bid went for the championship.

It was Axis +0. @djensen can attest to that.

More importantly, I want to say that I could have written this post about your final assessment of your experience after last year’s tournament, which was my first experience at GenCon. The only differences would be that I played with a partner, so I could remove that mistake, but would have to add that I booked my hotel too late, leaving me with a cheap a hotel, too far away and lost sleep to a crappy bed an unnecessary travel back and forth

I wouldn’t say my “playing without a partner” was necessarily a mistake. I tried convincing any relevant A&A player in my life to partner with me. It just didn’t work out (and I didn’t want to miss the event outright). That being said I will continue to advocate that 1v1 should the official format for tournament play, even if I am in the minority. Most of the teams I played against were basically “the main player” and “the advisor who catches mistakes” anyway, in my opinion.

We played too fast for our own good.

Yup. Although playing fast is necessary in some cases to force extra turns in the format as-is. I needed to force extra turns in game #3, for example, or I would most certainly have lost.

We tried to cram in too much practice just before the tournament.

I can relate to that for other games, but I spent about 7 months prepping for this specific tournament format and have been playing semi-actively since 2008 (although I have never bothered with this one in Online Leagues, so my level of play isn’t as high as something like Revised for 42SE. Online Format Vs. F2F format are basically completely different games anyway, so that sort of experience wouldn’t necessarily help beyond a firmer grasp on the openings).

We did not bring enough snacks to the hall and had to fight through the convention crowds to grab meals between games.

Yup. At least the Gen Con food is pretty good as far as convention hall stuff goes (I’ve played TCGs for most of my life, so I’ve had way worse).

All of it derived from a severe underestimate of how a lack of sleep would effect our play. We lost on a mistake I would not have thought we would ever have made, and it was far from our only error.

The 9-hour car ride on top of everything else was something I forgot to mention on my end. I’d like to imagine the lack of sleep affects everyone (mostly) equally though.

If you have not played in GenCon or a similar tournament, you have to know that you will try to play at your max speed to get in the most game you can. Going fast and not sleeping is a recipe for mistakes no matter how experienced a player you are.

I have about 3-4 years worth of playing other multi-year conventions for A&A + a lot longer for other games, so I at least knew about this stuff going in. It’s very good advice to give new players coming in off of YT videos and such, though.

The trick is to ensure you’ve got enough sleep and awareness that you won’t miss the devastating mistakes that will cost you the game. It is not hard to do, you just need to go in with an appreciation for what its like deep in the tourney. Hopefully this thread is enough to provide that for anyone considering attending for the first time.

Yeah. In my case I think physical conditioning is also a big factor. I should not have been skipping gym days in the month before the tournament for sure. That sort of thing was never a problem for me in the past but I just do not have as much natural stamina as I did in my teens/20s. Part of getting older I guess.

Anyway, thanks for the comment! Sorry that you were also not able to win it all. I can’t make it to the Dayton tournament later this year (just not in the cards money/time-investment wise, as November is crunch time for both my job and wallet due to Christmas), but will hope to come to more events next year.
G

L25 BM4 - 2024 Final Ghostglider (Axis) vs Farmboy (Allies+15)

League
• • • Ghostglider

13

0
Votes

13
Posts

115
Views

F

@Ghostglider note that I made an edit of the bid inf in Burma from UK pacific to British.