May 20, 2013, 08:03:24 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Do you live near Cincinnati? Join us this weekend for A&A Spring Gathering XI on April 5-6, 2013. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Why are there Canadian roundels? A new rule perhaps?  (Read 6904 times)
Brain Damaged
Guest
« Reply #90 on: April 03, 2010, 08:49:12 pm »
0

Quote
I'll have to check next time I go to my storage unit. I seem to remember lime green US Marines in the old A&A Pacific, but that was only infantry


in some boxes of Revised, the United Kingdom came in lime green.  My set came with United Kingdom in tan, but the tanks were lime green

The UK was lime green? I definitely don't remember that. I thought it might be the US they were talking about.
Logged
johnnymarr
A&A.org Tank
*
***
Posts: 421


How Soon Is Now?


View Profile
« Reply #91 on: April 03, 2010, 08:54:57 pm »
0

Quote
The UK was lime green?

in some sets yes.  In others, they were tan. In my case, a little of both
Logged
Brain Damaged
Guest
« Reply #92 on: April 03, 2010, 09:55:19 pm »
0

Quote
The UK was lime green?

in some sets yes.  In others, they were tan. In my case, a little of both

Okay then what color was the US, if the UK was lime green?
Logged
johnnymarr
A&A.org Tank
*
***
Posts: 421


How Soon Is Now?


View Profile
« Reply #93 on: April 04, 2010, 09:28:38 am »
0

Quote
what color was the US, if the UK was lime green?

dark green
Logged
Canuck12
A&A.org Fighter
*
*****
Posts: 1410



View Profile
« Reply #94 on: April 04, 2010, 10:40:24 am »
0

So then back to topic:
How will the UK Split income work then?
I suppose we will now all shift our speculations to India?
This seems so ahistorical to me; the UK didn't have to produce jack-squat in India if they didn't want to but they sure as hell had to produce units in Canada because they couldn't maintain enough homeland production for defence of the UK.

Does this mean that the UK will be forced to spend 50% or 40% or 12 IPCs or 8 IPCs in India? How will it be calculated? What happens when Japan has all British territories in the South Pacific except India and I am quite happy to abandon it? Do I still have to place units there?

Seems like Canadian split income was a much better fit for simplicity's sake.

Do we know when the "its just for recognition" announcement came out? Was it before or after the announcement of split income?
Logged
Brain Damaged
Guest
« Reply #95 on: April 04, 2010, 11:10:11 am »
0

Do we know when the "its just for recognition" announcement came out? Was it before or after the announcement of split income?

Yes, it was August 2, 2009. See link:

http://www.harrisgamedesign.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1838&start=32
Logged
Make_It_Round
A&A.org Bomber
*****
Posts: 2456


'Scramble' all fighters...


View Profile
« Reply #96 on: April 04, 2010, 01:53:33 pm »
0

@ Canuck 12: Actually the definitive post is here, it came after the split income post that temporarily revived hopes for some sort of Canadian representation in the game (no one ever thought they'd be a completely independent power, except in house-rule-land):

http://www.harrisgamedesign.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=2266

And you're right. The split income goes to India; everything on the Pacific board, in fact. It's been confirmed, so it's no longer a subject of speculation (except in some of the finer details).

Larry's been quite forthcoming in the past week, thus we're starting to get a much better picture of what the Europe and Global '40 games will be like. He's revealed, for example, that Italy will typically have a very active role in the Middle East, opening up a second front against the USSR from the south...
Logged
Brain Damaged
Guest
« Reply #97 on: April 04, 2010, 04:45:07 pm »
0

How did the split income revive hope? Canada was never a realistic possibilty on this issue. Was it just wishful thinking?
Logged
Dylan the Canadian
A&A.org Aircraft Carrier
******
Posts: 2550


Victory! :D


View Profile
« Reply #98 on: April 10, 2010, 08:28:06 pm »
0

That would make sense, because Winston Churchill was ready to set up his armies in Canada.
Logged
Funcioneta
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*******
Posts: 12839


AA50 '42 2010 League Champion


View Profile
« Reply #99 on: April 11, 2010, 08:06:54 am »
0

How did the split income revive hope? Canada was never a realistic possibilty on this issue. Was it just wishful thinking?

India is even worst than Canada, specially if India collects income from West Canada and doens't collect income from West India tongue Check the AAP40 game manual: there is a picture where West Canada is one territory, not 2, and has a UK roundel, not a canadian roundel ... seems they cannot decide about this issue  undecided

Why Larry put those canadian roundels if they're not going to have any role? It's pointless! You can guess that many of us will ignore that silly India 2nd capital and use the canadians as 2nd capital instead  wink
Logged
Brain Damaged
Guest
« Reply #100 on: April 11, 2010, 01:06:08 pm »
0

I think Larry put the Canadian roundels on the board just as recognition of Canada's contribution.
Logged
Funcioneta
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*******
Posts: 12839


AA50 '42 2010 League Champion


View Profile
« Reply #101 on: April 12, 2010, 01:09:58 am »
0

But from a gaming point of view it has no sense and can confuse some stubborn dudes (and I know some very stubborn dude in my FTF game)  undecided
Logged
cressman8064
A&A.org Mechanized Infantry
**
Posts: 85


Canada's Dream


View Profile
« Reply #102 on: April 12, 2010, 08:55:45 am »
0

I've heard about the Pacific IPC going to India and Europe IPCs goign to Britian, but i like the idea of all UK roundels IPCs spent at any UK factory, and all Canadian IPC spent at the Canadian factory, seems simpler. The only reason I can see this wasn't done is with this set-up UK can throw down 10 INF on India for defense, when in a solo Pacific game they would be down to 4IPCs and ready to be crushed.
Logged
Funcioneta
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*******
Posts: 12839


AA50 '42 2010 League Champion


View Profile
« Reply #103 on: April 12, 2010, 09:01:09 am »
0

The only reason I can see this wasn't done is with this set-up UK can throw down 10 INF on India for defense, when in a solo Pacific game they would be down to 4IPCs and ready to be crushed.

Tha'ts exactly the reason why Canada should be the 2nd UK economy, not India. India cannot hold poppoing only one dude each round

As for 10 guys each round at India: probably a horrible idea if germans know what to do, and anyway it can be easily solved: put a minor IC at India instead the big one ... or back to old IC AA50 rules for that matter. I still don't like the new IC mechanic and I still prefer plastic ICs  wink
Logged
finnman
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 348



View Profile
« Reply #104 on: April 12, 2010, 09:10:19 am »
0

The only reason I can see this wasn't done is with this set-up UK can throw down 10 INF on India for defense, when in a solo Pacific game they would be down to 4IPCs and ready to be crushed.

Tha'ts exactly the reason why Canada should be the 2nd UK economy, not India. India cannot hold poppoing only one dude each round

As for 10 guys each round at India: probably a horrible idea if germans know what to do, and anyway it can be easily solved: put a minor IC at India instead the big one ... or back to old IC AA50 rules for that matter. I still don't like the new IC mechanic and I still prefer plastic ICs  wink

I like plastic ICs better to but I love the knew rules
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!