@trulpen said in G40 Balance Mod - Feedback Thread:
@oysteilo said in G40 Balance Mod - Feedback Thread:
How do i/we play with bombers at 12 vs 14? If default is different
You will have to adjust by edit.
Come on…
@trulpen said in G40 Balance Mod - Feedback Thread:
@oysteilo said in G40 Balance Mod - Feedback Thread:
How do i/we play with bombers at 12 vs 14? If default is different
You will have to adjust by edit.
Come on…
I think the point is to save time in global games. By far round 1 is the slowest round because you are shuffling and merging and re-stacking everything. Even though you more or less know the set up after a few games it takes time because there are units everywhere. This is very much true for Germany, Russia and japan but goes for all other nations too. For france you set up a bunch of units which are removed instantly.
After Round 1, there are units in maybe half of the initial territories and this must save a lot of time.
How do i/we play with bombers at 12 vs 14? If default is different
@axis-dominion said in 19L CHAMPIONSHIP: axis-dominion vs adam (allies+19) bm3:
@oysteilo and our goal was to make this the fastest championship game in history :)
I think that is very good. In previous years it has been going on for “years”, except last year.
Only bad thing is… makes it hard to follow!
I dont know, but would think no
There is no need to let the saves live for ever. They can be deleted yearly as far as I am concerned
I think you guys do a great job and I am happy to support the site!
@trulpen said in trulpen (X) vs oysteilo (A+5) BM3:
@oysteilo said in trulpen (X) vs oysteilo (A+5) BM3:
Initially I somehow misread your initial request. I thought you wanted an italian fighter to NM persia. I dont think the edit of one inf (from caucasus?) makes that much of a difference for my french plane
I don’t think it does, but nevermind.
So if you want the edit i don’t mind. Right now it looks like you have changed your mind anyway. I trust your extensive edits are correct, but keep in mind sometimes it is easier to do the battles over again and rather edit the outcomes…
Simon takes:
Fighters: Moscow, Malta, Stalingrad, Scotland
Subs: SZ110, SZ98
inf Yunnan
DD SZ91
Art Sudan
Tank Egypt
inf Gibraltar
Mech Burma
@Midnight_Reaper said in Axis & Allies .org 2023 Support Drive:
@djensen I just attempted to support at the Gold level. Do please let me know if you don’t receive it.
-Midnight_Reaper
@djensen same here, I donated for gold several weeks back and I really want my badge!!!
Okey. If third party find that the caucasus edits are reasonable then go ahead. The bryansk edits are fine too
@trulpen said in Tutor game: AndrewAAGamer (X) vs trulpen [and everyone else] (A+50) OOB:
@oysteilo said in Tutor game: AndrewAAGamer (X) vs trulpen [and everyone else] (A+50) OOB:
for a 50 bid. I would take:
British
Scotland: 1 fighter
Sz 110, 91 and 98: 1 sub each
sz 71: 1 transport
Egypt: 1 infantryChina
Yunnan: 1 infAnzac
sz 62: 1 sub
New Guinea: 1 infThe China and sz 62 bid is to discourage a J1 attack. J1 attack is extremely powerful when playing OOB version
That’s a great bid. Suspect however that the inf in NG will not be accepted.
all right, then an inf in alexandria or so.
Some might think 3 subs are too much. I think it is a strong bid, because in sz 110 you can choose to have the sub fight or not, combined with a possible 3 fighter scramble and a scotland scramble it becomes “impossible” for Germany to kill both 110 and 111
But most likely the sub in 110 is not going to fight. Now, you are in great shape if you want to do taranto raid, but if you want to stack 92 you also put great pressure on Italy with your 3 subs and everything else you might put there. So the sub bid is both defensive (110 and 91) but also highly offensive!
I am not sure if they want any support. I did my gold support in early november for 2023, but stil no badge or feed back. I assume they have enough funds then
I just think it is important to discuss why you suggest what bid where and discuss it a little bit if this is going to be a tutor game!
i am sure it is fine. I will look at it when i do the move
since this is a tutor game i am throwing in my 2 cents here. If you play OOB with a healthy bid at least +50.
Priority 1: stack Yunnan R1. Bid: 1 chinese inf and 2 russian fighters (moscow and stalingrad) 23 ipc
Priority 2: fighter scotland and sub 110. This makes it too risky to take out both british fleets 110 and 111. Now we are at 39 ipc total
Personally i would also place sub in egypt sz and maybe also in gibraltar and canada. Here you might have other priorities and place men in eastern USSR, but really I dont see the need for more than 2 artillary to team up with the 18 russians +2 AA
For BM at 20:
french inf to normandy (makes vichy more complicated)
fighter scotland
sub egypt
1 ipc to india
If you want to redo the whole turn and change your buy, just roll over again and let new dice stand. Is that fair?
@trulpen said in Tutor game: AndrewAAGamer (X) vs trulpen [and everyone else] (A+50) OOB:
Think it’s possible to have multiple tutor games going. Not much of a problem. I’m not the man for OOB though.
I thik if ABH and crockett36 are doing a tutor game at 69 in bid it is smooth to set up a new thread and we discuss the bid there