Exacta-mundo NC!

Instead of all bombing done by one power, divert the cost across multiple powers (quite historic if you ask me). Even a sassy player like myself would consider a russian bomber if the cash flow is there.

If you get real crazy with NA’s…… lend lease can make this pipe dream(crack pipe off course) a reality. And forget about superfortresses - they wreck Germany every time.

But if and when the zitties start hitting (non-NA games), it is a large loss to the allies. Law of averages will eventually shoot down bombers as you throw enough of them at Gerry. The outcome from this is determined by how well you spent your disposable income after Bomber purchases. In all actuality, it would have to be a KGF tactic. Bring the entire US fleet around to the Atlantic, along with the latecoming British aussie fleet, and as they slowly feed into the game, you may be able to offset the german naval onslaught. I get the impression that if the allies do not feed all existing forces into Europe, Germany can offset some of the IPC loss with gains in Africa / Mid East / Russia combo and also the possibilty of an early and undeterred naval consolidation.

In conclusion,

good luck!

NewPaintbrush

^^ can we get the condensed version of that post ^^

Sheesh    :evil:

Allies -

fighter on AC in pearl
extra tranny for UK - where ever

Axis -

I like Lybia idea - stock it
Tranny for Med fleet
3 art for Norway - they’ll come out firing 6 - twos plus whatever planes you throw for support
4 Inf for Ukraine - a strong counter attack on west russian stack

What is preventing this program from developing the technology to simply allow two players to simultaneously play from their homes?

I would figure the hard part is already done with the layout, programming and graphics.

The fact of the matter is that having a computer program as opposed to live play really cuts down on the time it takes to finish a game.
ie no set up, fumbling of pieces, searching for chips, etc.

PS ––> Thanks to everybody for their input on this subject

PPS --> Can’t the designers of the program make the computer any smarter?

88 -

Completely understandable to sidestep the multitude of emails, but……

Doesn’t the game require both competitors to be present(live) for decisions like:

1- Which casualties to dismiss first
2- Which countries casualties are dismissed first in multi-nationally occupied territories
3- anyhting else that i would be overlooking

also,
I don’t think i understand the principals of how two people play this game.
-How do both players see the same gameboard?
-What information is emailed, and in what form?

Excuse the barrage of questions, i’m just having a hard time putting it all together.

88 – thanks, that is exactly something i am looking for.

Is this what people use to play each other here?

Can I play anyone who downloads it, or do both computers have to be networked?

Can you alter rules, adjust AI difficulties, include bids and/or NA’s?

Thanks again

Is that it everyone?

PBEM and Forum???

Which is better?

Which is quicker?

Which do you like and why?

Can anyone

1- explain in detail….

2- list and link me to…

[or]

3- direct me to a thread containing….

All Possible Options for playing A&A (any) whether it be live, PBEM, computer programs, games, tournaments, ETC.

Any inclusive info on preferences, supplies, durations of gameplay, reccomendations, clubs, costs, ETC. would be appreciated

i am interested in raising my gameplay from 0 games a month to about 2-3 games a month. 

TY 

I believe you were very close with theÂ

Magic Gnomes

 comment.

seriously….  :mrgreen:

Curious if AAR was ever turned into a video game like the original version AA had with ???Hasbro???

Or any various versions besides email.

Systems that allow play with a computer.