On 2002-05-30 12:48, Anonymous wrote:
DAMN RIGHT America sucks !! I BLOW UP UP YOUR MOM. IF FBI COMES YOU DID IT !!! HOTDOG!!! CANADA RULES
Why dont you register, tough guy.
On 2002-05-30 12:48, Anonymous wrote:
DAMN RIGHT America sucks !! I BLOW UP UP YOUR MOM. IF FBI COMES YOU DID IT !!! HOTDOG!!! CANADA RULES
Why dont you register, tough guy.
I saw Star Wars a new hope in the theater when i was 5, was born in 72’, the only thing i remember is Ben being hit with Vaders lightsaber and vanishing.
Sorry, you take a life, depending on the circumstances, your rights are gone, period.
On 2002-05-17 10:19, yourbuttocks wrote:
I heard that the acting, while better than the Phantom Menace, is not as good as episodes 4-6. I heard christonson (how do spell his name) does a good job, but Ewan McGregor whines a lot. I also heard that Yoda is more like a frog with a glowstick on coke than a AJedi Master. And I heard it doesn’t really get into gear until the last half an hour.
Who watches a Star Wars movie for the acting!!!
Christansen is the whiner in the movie, not Mcgregor.
Yoda is tight, his fight sceen is the highlight of the movie.
So long as the child killed belongs to the person/people who say yes.
[ This Message was edited by: Mr Ghoul on 2002-05-17 13:45 ]
Yes, The US may place any unit in Hawaii.
Its a Starting factory.
I saw it last night at a midnight showing….its was good, much better the Phantom crap!
Yoda is Hardcore!
On 2002-05-16 13:39, dezrtfish wrote:
HFW- thats called darwinisam. Parents need to be more responsable, there were many guns in my house as a kid and buy some miracle I survived.In case anyone is curious I own 4 shotguns 9 rifles and 2 handguns.
Holy sh*t! Thats a lot of guns.
My Dad had a shotgun around when i was growing up, if i even got near it, my Dad would whip my ass.
“It is like comparing the axis and allies tank to the axis and allies europe tank. big difference!”
Quote from Horten Flyingwing
LOL, nice
What were this Le Pen guys veiws, i heard almost nothing about him.
LOL, im in Winnipeg, about 8 hours, by car, away. You never know.
America new war with Japan was going to happen, they just tried to delay it enough to help Britain deal with the Nazis.
Pearl Habour is a long way from Japan, know one would have thought an attack on Pearl Harbour was “possible”.
Blah, you can just kick him off every now and then.
Give him a toy Bazooka and tell him to go play for awhile. :cool:
Yanny, where is this being held.
Killing a violent convicted crimmnal could be looked at as self defence, the defence of society.
[ This Message was edited by: Mr Ghoul on 2002-05-09 17:47 ]
On 2002-05-09 15:47, Disclaimer wrote:
I can see what you are saying about having enough hard evidence to convict someone. But when there is a lack of hard evidence, then the death penatly should not be a choice. I also agree with yourbuttocks. The death penalty is not used only against predators but against everyone convicted. Also, if someone kills another person by means of the death penalty, is that not murder? How can we bend our rules for certain situations.[/quote/]
We bend the rules in war, why not here.
On 2002-05-08 16:49, Candyman67 wrote:
Nice map and Carl looks very foxy! Just kidding.
LOL. sick
I have no problem with women in the military, as long as the standards arent lowered just to have them “in” the military
As far as i know, cap fighters are just added to the defence of the other units you may have in a sea zone. Enemy fighters can fly threw the cap, or engage it.
Ex; If a loaded jap carrier, is attacked and there are 4 cap fighters in the sea zone, they all defend against the attack. If the attack include fighters that wish to a attack an island in the zone, then the attakcing fighters would ignore the cap.
So, if, as you mention, the US attacks 2 japs transports and 4 jap fighters(cap)with 6 fighters, all the japs units defend against the attack……i think.
[ This Message was edited by: Mr Ghoul on 2002-05-07 11:39 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Mr Ghoul on 2002-05-07 11:40 ]