i really like SS2, ill give you a game as soon as i am upgraded.
maybe in a few years we can leave audio messages on the forums, much better approach for lazy people like me
on the other hand i guess some joker would just burp on it and find the knowledge that other people unwillingly listen to it quite amusing… more work for the regulators then… nice idea though
i am in full favour of one world currency and world government… but too lazy explain my point of view… which of course also protects me from the (maybe) constructive criticism of other people… haha :lol:
right this might seem straightforward, but it is not to me:
why do americans refer to football as football despite that you clearly use your hands more than anything…
and then to our nice and sense making game football u give the name ‘soccer’? what going on there…
attempt of cultural imperialism or alternative marketing…??
all resposes clearing this myth are appreciated… 8)
sorry in advance about the silly question, but
can s.o. confirm that germany needs to take two capitals to win the game, whereas the allies have to kill all germans off?
also, can the germans achieve an economic victory like in a&a1?
thanks, laters :)
easy tiger, that smile is just there because i was happy that i could fit this rather amusing, but on the other hand quite useless information in. be happy for me too :)
i am german myself, i wdnt let harm to my people, would i??
anyways, bed time here now, laters
id go with the 109. it just a better killer i think. i think the spitfire’s are a bit overrated in relation to the battle of britain as the germans only had 30min fuel over england, so thats a hell of an advantage.
also this, most of the kills on the british side in that ‘battle’ were made by hurricanes not spitfires. the spitfire success was hyped because it was a ‘sexier’ plane