No problem at all. Providing the tanks didn’t move in the combat phase they can move anywhere that is friendly during non-combat.
The recently captured territory would count as friendly in this scenario
No problem at all. Providing the tanks didn’t move in the combat phase they can move anywhere that is friendly during non-combat.
The recently captured territory would count as friendly in this scenario
I guess you could potentially spend money on units you couldn’t place right before you know your capital is going to be taken meaning less money for the person sacking it. I don’t think this would be significant enough to be considered the aforementioned “terrible loophole”
I wouldn’t say the rules are incorrect. All other sequences are voluntary, however Purchase is directly linked to Mobilize. So if you elect to purchase you are also electing to mobilize. A little misleading but I wouldn’t say the rules are incorrect.
Take the DEI, subdue China and deny Calcutta resources via taking their islands and convoying them.
Ok, this sounds interesting. So a couple Q’s here–-
1) in taking the DEI, you’ve now awaken the “sleeping Giant” & are now @ war w/all the Allies. who will probably start steaming towards that position–so how many rounds does it take to
Taking the DEI (and attacking UK/ANZAC) does not result in war with the USA. Only attacking USA will result in bringing them into the war
I really should of built an IC in egypt… that was a big mistake. Arghh… so many mistakes and I had so many opportunities… Anyone have a time machine?
I used most the atlantic fleet to kill all the subs on first turn, so was at least another turn off getting the remainders into the Med. Would you leave the subs in the atlantic?
I should clarify, UK was never under threat and Germany did not concentrate much at all in the Atlantic/Western Europe until Russia had begun to crumble. I still was unable to save Cairo being taken I4. I am not the best player, especially playing UK so there would be a lot of things I need to improve on my UK game
@Eggman:
Can china use bid for another fighter? Or seeing as they can’t build it, does it take away the possibility?
That would be up to the players involved.
I just checked the league rules, and I don’t see anything there that would prohibit it- meaning in theory you could bid a Chinese bomber or Tanks if you wanted.
Would make things interesting having 2 fighters for China, whether it would be worth it is hard to evaluate.
Just thought I would post a shot of a set-up game a couple of games ago.
Interesting idea, but I don’t see how this would be that useful to our groups AA games. I could certainly use it in Zombies or Last night on earth - I am notorious for knocking stuff over with dice in those games.
At the ends of my table, instead of dice towers, is an entire area for dice rolling. I found most our group like rolling the dice in the traditional craps style dice rolling as opposed to dice towers and space wasn’t really an issue. The removable battle-board I created can sit anywhere within the dice rolling region (or sit outside) giving ample space on each side to roll, and having all the units that are fighting visible.
The downside of the acrylic shield is if, like our group, you like to line up the units on a battle-board for mid to large battles, you are still going to need a space to set up these units.
Can china use bid for another fighter? Or seeing as they can’t build it, does it take away the possibility?