@Guerrilla:
I don’t like Tiger Tanks as much due to it’s complexity…possible a first strike Capability on the first cycle although that might be too powerful… if we(you :wink: ) did add that maybe the Russians should get a T-34 Advantage…
GG
These revised advantages are truly balanced and I playtested most of them in some 15 to 20 games. Some of them need some work but Mr. Andersson seems to have found out it him self. I have to say Mr. Andersson have managed to impress me a lot with his creative and effective ideas. I love his ideas and find them very balanced, the guys and I who plays the game have decided to implement most of these rules as a standard. We will consider the last changes, and find them really nice. Again thank you Mr. Andersson! :D
Even if I have not used the Tiger Tank advantage for Germany yet, I do think it will do GG. The reason is that Germany always (when I play) rely on tanks in masses. That is why it will be a great benefit for them in hunting any russian infantry down. Not to mention that Tigers in combination with Panzergrenadiers would offer in Affrica! A first strike capability would be too powerful IMO! This advantage is just perfect as is and not too complicated IMO! Try it, I will. Too much offense to Germany will destroy the game balance, since they need to be aggresive. I also think that Panzergrenadiers will be better than Panzerblitz that it replace, it is better for the Affrican campaign and as good as Panzerblitz on the Eastern Front. But I liked the SS variant more. :( I guess the Tiger Tanks can compensate for a stronger punch. :wink:
I realy liked that Mr. Andersson went back to the revised Wolf Packs in combination with U-boat Programme, since it gives Germany a strong incentive to build submarines. And I love the new super submarine as well. I love many more things about this article and again, THANK YOU Mr Andersson for a great work. :D