@Tall:
DFWSupertrooper,
On “range” I feel this way - the size of a terriory is VERY large in a military scale (i.e. - ALL of Central France, ALL of Western Germany, etc). A Corps or Army Commander would likely only affect units in the same territory - that to me is a “Field Commander” vs a “Theater” Commander or “Supreme Commander.”
DFWSupertrooper, I agree with your general thoughts concerning the “range” of land Generals.
–---------------------------
But as for the Naval Admirals they usually (but not always) had much larger “theater” sized commands (“range”). Like “Atlantic”, “South Pacific”, “Pacific Ocean Areas”, etc.
I believe the Admirals would need a larger “range”,…OR just give them a
geographical “range”, such as “Atlantic”.
What does everyone think??? (concerning the Admirals)
“Tall Paul”
Yeah, Paul. Agreed. I think your idea is spot on on that - perhaps a Field Commander unit should be different than a Fleet Commander unit in scope?