I’ve noticed that a stack of six tanks is formidable esp. when the Germans and Austrians are poised to sweep down on France.
Latest posts made by Chuck Carey
-
RE: Infantry vs. Artillery vs. Tank Builds
-
RE: Infantry vs. Artillery vs. Tank Builds
Tanks are most useful when combined with stacks of infantry, artillery and planes. Six tanks, for example, can change considerably the math involved in a counterattack. I think they are very much worth their cost.
-
RE: The Kill India Thrust: Pro or Con?
Turkey ties up UK in the East, Germany and AH knock out Russia early, and then march through France and Italy for the win. One key part being the ability of the Turks to threaten India.
-
RE: The Kill India Thrust: Pro or Con?
Paris is easier to take if UK sends 46 inf to India instead of Picardy, regardless of when Russia falls.
-
RE: The Kill India Thrust: Pro or Con?
If UK builds 46 inf in India, then they aren’t putting 46 inf in Picardy. Imagine how much easier that makes it for Germany to take Paris.
I think Turkey has to march on India or Egypt just to keep the Brits preoccupied. They may not take either, but the effort should make it easier for their mates to achieve victory.
-
RE: The Kill India Thrust: Pro or Con?
Taking India is a great idea. The problem is, as soon as the Turks take Persia, the Brits will load up in India. But that will keep them from doing something else.
I think another viable approach for the Turks is to advance on Egypt. It’s much harder for the Brits to defend , plus the IPC haul is much better if the Turks can take Africa.