It was already included with the new 1.1a fix. sorry i forgot to mention it in the update section :)
Posts made by CHILDREN
-
RE: Minor Threat's Alpha+3.9 (Global 1940) COMPLETE! Setup Charts
-
RE: Minor Threat's Alpha+3.9 (Global 1940) COMPLETE! Setup Charts
@ Little_Boot hehe no prob man :)
I have one last update for these charts, as i want them to be perfect. I fixed some sizing issues with the unit silhouettes on the Unit Reference Chart. This will be the final update for cosmetic fixes, however, I will be updating them for major errors, if needed be.
the new charts are designated with a “1.1a” prefix
thank you everyone, Enjoy :)
-
RE: Convoy System
http://www.harrisgamedesign.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=6149
its at the bottom, in green
-
RE: Minor Threat's Alpha+3.9 (Global 1940) COMPLETE! Setup Charts
Hey General Chang,
It seems to be working now, could you give a try? if not i will re-upload. Sometimes the site takes time to render the file…
-
RE: Minor Threat's Alpha+3.9 (Global 1940) COMPLETE! Setup Charts
new update,
-2/13/2012 Fixed Japanese Battleship size (on the Units Reference Chart) to a much more consistent size.its more of a cosmetic issue and does not affect gameplay.
Your welcome guys! :-D
there’s more to come in the future… :) -
RE: Minor Threat's Alpha+3.9 (Global 1940) COMPLETE! Setup Charts
updated! check description
-
RE: Minor Threat's Alpha+3.9 (Global 1940) COMPLETE! Setup Charts
The final version of these Charts are uploaded. :)
please verify that all information is correct before printing. (I revised these countless times before uploading for minimal errors, but i’m human too) -
Minor Threat's Alpha+3.9 (Global 1940) COMPLETE! Setup Charts
Update!
-2/8/2012 Adjusted Japan’s income to 26 IPCs
-2/11/2012 Updated to Alpha+3.9 (Final Version of the Charts)
-2/12/2012 Fixed US Chart to display proper ‘Victory Conditions’. Download updated file (United States) with 2012-02-12 date
-2/12/2012 Fixed spelling error with UK Chart under Canadian Income Relocation. Download updated file- United Kingdom 1.1
-2/13/2012 Fixed Japanese Battleship size to a much more consistent size. Download (optional) updated file- Japan 1.1
-2/15/2012 Updated all the charts to have more consistent unit sizes on the Unit Reference Chart. This will be the final cosmetic update! Download (optional) updated file - 1.1a [All charts]
-2/15/2012 Fixed/updated Germany’s air units to 1 tac bomber & 2 strat Bombers (in the territory of Germany) download new file 1.1a Germany
-2/16/2012 Fixed China’s “Captured Capital” paragraph. download updated file - China 1.2a
-5/04/2012 United States & United Kingdom have been updated to version 1.2a (added fighter to Western US and 1 Infantry to Egypt.) China has also been updated to v1.3a (removed NB,AB, MIC, MAIC, and AA from unit reference chart)I have been working on these for some time now, and they’re finally complete!
Enjoy! :-)http://www.mediafire.com/?7hif1zhorbz89
Settings:
Printer Color settings: I did these with RGB color setting, so they should print out slightly different with CMYK
Paper to Print these on: Photo Glossy, or Photo Paper. (if done with regular paper, or cardstock they’ll look awful)
Paper Size: Letter 8.5 x 11 -
RE: Scramble clarification [Alpha+.2]
It may not be attacking the sea zone, but the amphibious assault is enough incentive to launch a scramble. The fact that the units are being unloaded unto your territory qualifies as an attack.
-
RE: Minor Threat's Setup Charts & NO Cards
All the mistakes found on these, will be corrected and/or updated to the Alpha 3 rules soon.
-
RE: AA Guns Alpha 3 Question
US naval ship class designations and their origins:
BB - _B_attleship, _B_roadside
CV - _C_ruiser, A_v_iation
CA - _C_ruiser, _A_rmored
DD - _D_estroyer, ?
SS - _S_hip, _S_ubmersibleBroadside battleship, as opposed to a turreted battleship (an early design).
CV, because CA was already taken.
CA harkens back to the days of sail - armored as opposed to wooden.
DD is shrouded in mystery. Early destroyers were designated TBD, for Torpedo Boat Destroyer, as that was their original function. The best guess is that when the navy standardized their ship designations (and destroyers had changed their primary mission), no one could come up with a good second letter, so another D was used.
SS is pretty obvious.
Hey, it all makes sense to the military mind! (I guess.)
Craig, thank you for schooling Gargantua!
anyway, than you all for the clarification responses.
-
RE: AA Guns Alpha 3 Question
sorry for the mix up, but i tend to use TT for Transport (caps to define a ship), and tt for territory.
I guess that makes sense, i wasn’t understanding the rule correctly. just got back from drinking a few brews with a friend…
-
AA Guns Alpha 3 Question
not sure if i understand this correctly… So which of these examples best relates to the new rule changes in Alpha 3 under AA guns.
Example 1.
2 Fighters fly over a hostile territory, 1 AA gun is defending, it fires 2 of its 3 volleys at the 2 fighters only and not all 3 volleys
Example 2.
2 Fighters fly over a hostile territory, 1 AA gun is defending, it fires ALL of its volleys at the two fighters for a total of 3 potential hits. (overkill)
EDIT: defined tt, made example a bit clearer.
-
RE: Players in southern Cal?
I’m a little rusty with A&A right now… so i’m not sure.
where in L.A. is it? -
Naval Base sea zone AA
What if Naval Bases could provide AA cover for ships in a sea zone serviced by a NB. It would seem logical, since the base is located near the coast and would most likely be equipped with Anti Aircraft weapons. So the rule would go something like this: Naval Bases could conduct an opening fire defensive action using an AA gun that could target no more than 3 air units, this would last only one round. After the AA gun fires, normal combat proceeds.
Though if the NB being used is damaged, it cannot use this ability.
-
RE: HERE WE GO AGAIN- LARRY TO POST ALPHA+3
Great… now i have to update my Setup Charts
-
RE: Rules Question (Krieghund help!! lol)
Hi SS Panther, i’m not completely sure but from my current knowledge of A&A Alpha+2, i will try to answer these. Someone correct me if i’m wrong:
1. If Japan makes an unprovoked DoW against the UK, and attacks Kwangtung or Burma, then yes, this will awake the sleeping giant. The US fighter then would be defending the territory.
2. I’m not sure on this one.
3. Nations can only move into friendly neutrals when at war.