I think the Med is handled pretty well. I could see splitting Mor/Alg but I don’t think they need to do much more with IPC values. One more seazone might help to keep some ships alive longer too, but I wouldn’t do too much. As it is I think you get a good 3-5 rds out of N. Afr/Med action (not counting any J influence). That seems pretty good to me.
It should break up North Africa more, and add some IPCs
Morocco/Algeria should be split in two territories.
Middle East got pretty big oil resources, and this should be better modelled in the game. Like in A&A Europe the middle east have an total of 8 IPC income. Larry did blow up East Indies and Borneo to 4 IPC income each, so why not make Persia 3 IPC and Trans-Jordan 3 IPC.
You can’t make Per worth 3.
Turn 1 = UK IC = game over, Allies win.I believe this was one of the factors in limiting IC production with new ICs in 2nd edition. I think in First Edition a common tactic was to buy a UK IC in Per and just place troops there.
With a 3 IPC Per, I don’t think the Axis ever crack it.
It would make sense if they made it so that the territories income could increase without increasing the amount of og units it could could produce. For example: increase Persia’s income to 3 IPCs and make their production only 1 unit