Alright, I did some more methodical testing of my problematic file, narrowed it down to a battle calc of a sub vs fig
Best posts made by axis-dominion
-
RE: Submarine-related Issues with TripleA
-
RE: Post League Game Results Here
@simon33 said in Post League Game Results Here:
truplen (Axis) over simon33 (Allies+9) BM3 no guerilla.
https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/33964/bm3-trulpen-x-vs-simon33-a-9-no-guerilla/76
you see, that’s why the guerrillas are needed ;)
-
RE: TT Pejones (X) vs adam-dominion (A+16) BM3
@trulpen said in TT Pejones (X) vs adam-dominion (A+16) BM3:
Also had a mental collapse regarding the purchase. Restarted because I wanted to build an ab in Berlin and then I forgot about it when I started to build all those figs. Hope it’s ok I adjust it.
Bought 6 inf, 3 art, 4 figs and repaired Leningrad for 6.
I think 1 fig, 1 art and 1 less repair will be good for an ab.
So changing to 6 inf, 2 art, 3 figs, 1 ab.
Sure go for it
-
RE: Submarine-related Issues with TripleA
Happens with more units involved too, but I was able to strip it down/narrow it to that.
-
RE: BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1
just finished America. before I do china, I wanted to give you an opportunity to correct for the possibility of guerrillas popping out in Hunan and chahar. all you need to do is to keep a land unit to garrison each territory (except aaa gun). I know you’re pretty new to bm3 so I wanted to give you the chance to correct before I play china. plz take my latest post, adjust your noncom in china as needed and re-post. then I’ll continue with china.
-
RE: TT Pejones (X) vs adam-dominion (A+16) BM3
this is all looking like Empire Strikes Back
-
RE: Submarine-related Issues with TripleA
@simon33 said in League General Discussion Thread:
I suspect it’s a resources issue. Happens more when you have more battle calculator windows open.
No I have to quit tripleA each time it happens. Have to open a new one to test it, and so I have one simple battle calc open. Pretty sure it’s not a resources issue. Happens on both my windows and Mac. And my windows is a new monster 32GB ram gaming laptop, you know, the heavy monsters that are so noisy lol
-
RE: BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1
@trulpen said in BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1:
@simon33 said in BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1:
Scrambling SZ110 had a +7 TUV expectation.
Am I doing something wrong here? According to my analysis before the battle I had a +90 % win with full scramble in sz110 and a TUV swing of +25-30.
Thought this was pretty ok, hypothetically, but I think we can conclude that I was heavily diced in both sea zones. ;) It happens and I’m not bitter about it, but I think I agree with that sz110 needed another tac. I’ll try and learn from it.
as Simon was trying to explain, when Germany isn’t prepared to follow up with a sea lion, even a win could end up being a pyrrhic one if she loses a few precious planes in the process. the fact that you ended up doing poorly was just a big fat bonus for the allies. I would’ve been content even losing so long as I blew out a few planes in the process.
-
RE: TT Pejones (X) vs adam-dominion (A+16) BM3
@trulpen said in TT Pejones (X) vs adam-dominion (A+16) BM3:
Will we finally get rid of the greek intrusion? Happy tidings for nazi-EU!
so exciting for you, how cute!
-
RE: BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1
@trulpen said in BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1:
@axis-dominion said in BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1:
even a win could end up being a pyrrhic one
Ok, so the point is that Bismarck is really needed in sz110?
that’s one approach people take. another approach is to add more air power. yet another is to provide a credible SL threat, to make the brits think twice about scrambling.
-
RE: TT adam-dominion (X) vs Coltwitt (A+20) bm3
@colt45554 said in TT adam-dominion (X) vs Coltwitt (A+20) bm3:
On a ski trip, won’t play till tuesday
thanks for the heads up. have fun!
-
RE: BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1
@trulpen said in BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1:
I’ve never done anything like this before. Noticed after my NCMs that you could actually hit sz6 with 1 sb and 2 figs, so I changed my NCM shifting back 2 figs to Japan. Hope that’s ok. Also I missed putting back the art on the transport by New Guinea after having moved in troops by Kwangtung. Hope it’s ok.
that’s fine, but I don’t have any subs in reach of sz6, and besides, even if I did, USA can’t attack Japan this turn, since you haven’t DOW’ed.
in case you didn’t fully understand these points, feel free to adjust or redo your noncom. I don’t want you to be playing without full understanding of the rules.
let me know when you’re done and want me to proceed, either with the current map or an updated one
-
RE: TT Oberkommando BrAeV (X) vs adam-dominion (A+18)
@aequitas-et-veritas said in TT Oberkommando BrAeV (X) vs adam-dominion (A+18):
I apologize to all for being slow. I have been promoted at my job and therefore my responibilty has grown. Will try to be more committed to our game @Adam514 and @axis-dominion .
Again, I am sorry.congrats man
-
RE: TT Oberkommando BrAeV (X) vs adam-dominion (A+18)
sorry guys, just remembered I have to make my turn here :) I’ll get to it today sometime
-
RE: BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1
since this has been a pretty heavy scrambling game so far…
scramble 112 ??
-
RE: TT Oberkommando BrAeV (X) vs adam-dominion (A+18)
@aequitas-et-veritas said in TT Oberkommando BrAeV (X) vs adam-dominion (A+18):
@axis-dominion @Adam514
Thank you for a Good Game Gents.Game result will be posted shortly.
great game guys, thanks for the match!
-
RE: BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1
@trulpen said in BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1:
Actually, when thinking about it, how come the neutral des doesn’t activate battle with the Russian sub? It should, I think. The fleet can’t be moved and is strictly defensive, but it’s pro-axis and the des cancels the subs stealth effect, right?
Yah it only defends, no attacking. That’s why no battle takes place. But if you really think that’s wrong, I suggest you pose the question in the general forums and see what the BM creators say.
-
RE: BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1
@trulpen said in BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1:
Of course, strictly defensive means that if no attack is made it doesn’t initiate battle. But why is it even there, lol?
Well it can defend if attacked, and also help provide additional cover if you were to move your fleet into that sz with them. They do go away if you take a.france, however.
-
RE: BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1
@trulpen said in BM3 trulpen (X+3) vs axis-dominion (A) #1:
Now I think I understand the neutral fleet a bit better. Thanks!
A question: I was rather stressed making this round. Made Italy when in school. And had a small time window now at home before moving on to boardgame night with friends.
In the end of Germany’s turn I realized that you have a pretty heavy can opener in Denmark with US. I wonder if you would allow me to change my buy for Germany to replace the ac with 2 des? Or if you allow Italy to have landed their 2 figs in S Italy instead of on the carriers?
Dice have been rolled, so no hard feelings if you won’t allow it.
Sure I’ll allow whatever changes you feel weren’t dependent on any of your rolls.