I suggest you download TripleA (there are turorials on the forums). You can play against the AI (like GTO I guess), hotseat and online. It rocks.
Latest posts made by Ashkayel
-
RE: AA Spring 1942 Online site?
-
RE: Rules - Sub blocking a transport-only amphibious assault
Ok! Thanks to both of you!
-
RE: Rules - Sub blocking a transport-only amphibious assault
Thanks. Krieghund, could you confirm this? I thought the rule was applied to AA42 and AA50 too.
-
Rules - Sub blocking a transport-only amphibious assault
Hey,
I know I have seen this somewhere in a rulebook or in an errata (maybe in G40?), but IIRC a transport alone cannot amphibious assault from a seazone containing enemy subs because the subs can destroy it before offloading its troops. Am I right? Is this true for AA42?
For example, on G1, I destroy the SZ2 UK fleet and move a sub to the SZ next to France (SZ7 I think), does this move prevent the SZ1 UK Trn from unloading troops in WEu?
Thanks
-
RE: 1941 version available on TripleA?
** I’ve posted this also in the AA41 forum **
Hi Veqryn,
I’ve found the following bug on the TripleA map:
-SZ39 (Wake) shouldn’t connect with SZ43 (Midway)
Ash
-
RE: World War 2 v6 1941
** I’ve also posted this in the Software forum **
Hi Veqryn,
I’ve found the following bug on the TripleA map:
-SZ39 (Wake) shouldn’t connect with SZ43 (Midway)
Ash
-
RE: Playing 1940.2 with 1940.1 box? (AAA pieces, charts, etc.)
Thanks for the info knp7765. I’ve seen some AAA pieces on HBG that are out of stock. In the meantime, I’ll probably use the old AAguns from AAE, AAP, AAR, AAP40 and AAE40 with national markers.
-
RE: Playing 1940.2 with 1940.1 box? (AAA pieces, charts, etc.)
Thanks for the tip for the ICs and the Tigers. Why are you mentioning the Italians?
-
Playing 1940.2 with 1940.1 box? (AAA pieces, charts, etc.)
Hi all,
I’ve bought G40.1 maybe a year ago, and I never actually played it FTF. I only played it by forum with ABattlemap, so I never got to use the pieces or the map. Now that G40.2 is out, I’m not sure if I’m willing to buy it seeing that I didn’t use G40.1 yet. So I would like to use my G40.1 stuff to play G40.2. Here are the things that I think I need :
-E40.2 and P40.2 rules and FAQ (from AH)
-Updated setup charts (I printed Minor Treat’s, or Sexhual Panda’s, for Alpha 3.9 and I think the only differences are 1 less UK Inf in Egypt and the Soviet attack on Korea that nullifies the NAP?)
-AAA pieces for each nation (that’s the problem)
-?Am I missing something?
Now, for the AAA pieces. What should I do to get these pieces? I guess I could use the old AAguns from previous versions (I have almost every A&A version) and “glue” them atop of nation markers, or paint them to match the different colors. Alternatively, I could buy some AAA units from Historical Board Gaming. Having not played G40.1 for a long time, I’m not even sure the new AAA rules were implemented at that time. So according to your experience, how many AAA pieces I should be looking at for each nation (assuming I’m using one AAA piece per territory with grey chips)?
I did not find a “AAA pieces package for G40 Alpha rules” or something like that on Historical Board Gaming, it would be the best!
So, what do you guys think of all that? What should I do to replace the cardboard AAguns?
Thanks
-
Victory Conditions
Hi guys!
I’m really excited about this game, I can’t wait to see it! I don’t know that much about WW1, compared to WW2. This game should teach me a few things!
So I’m wondering what could be the victory conditions of the Central Powers. I mean, in global A&A games, you have to capture a few capitals/victory cities so the final outcome, if the game would be continued, would be world domination. In WW1, is this really possible? Even if the Central Powers conquer France and Italy, it won’t necessarily lead to world domination, IMO. What do you think?
Nevertheless, I’m guessing the victory conditions will be something like that (with 8 capitals: 3 Central Powers, 5 Allies):
- Central Powers: Control 5 capitals
- Allies: Control 7 capitals
What do you guys think? Do you think it will be more objective based? Am I missing something?