Nukr lwol
Bal R2
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 21@1: (1)1@3: (2)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
Nukr lwol
Bal R2
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 21@1: (1)1@3: (2)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
Bal
Attack (1 Inf, 1 Fig)
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 01@1: (2)1@3: (4)
Defense (1 Inf)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)
Nukr
Attack (1 Inf, 1 Fig, 1 Tac)
Rolls: 1@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 21@1: (6)1@3: (2)1@4: (4)
Defense (1 Inf)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
Combat
1 Inf Bel to Bal
1 Fig Rus to Bal
1 Inf, 1 Tac Bry to Nukr
1 Fig Rus to Nukr
R8
36 IPCs
12 Inf (36)
save 0
Yes; they’re quite extinct now.
Excellent defense, boys. :lol:
At least they were Brits.
That’s very nice Jen, but this is still the FAQ thread.
Feel free to start a Japan NO thread with Cow.
Knew I should’ve brought a DD.
Sfr twol
Tun twol
SZ 93 cwlo 1 SS, 1 Fig
Syr twlo 1 Inf
Non-coms
1 AA gun Nita to Fra
2 Inf Alb to Bul
1 Fig, 1 Tac SZ 93 to Sita
2 DD SZ 95 to SZ 97
Place
1 Mech, 1 Arm Sita
Collect
17 - 1 = 16 IPCs
Alx twol
Sud twol
Ken twol
Sfr
Attack (2 Inf, 2 Art, 1 Arm)
Rolls: 4@2 1@3; Total Hits: 34@2: (1, 2, 5, 3)1@3: (2)
Defense (1 Inf, 1 Art)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (6, 3)
Tun
Attack (1 Inf, 1 Art, 1 Mech)
Rolls: 1@1 2@2; Total Hits: 11@1: (3)2@2: (6, 2)
Defense (1 Inf)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
SZ 93
Attack (1 SS, 2 Fig, 1 Tac)
Rolls: 1@2 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 31@2: (1)2@3: (5, 1)1@4: (4)
Defense (1 DD, 1 CA)
Rolls: 1@2 1@3; Total Hits: 21@2: (1)1@3: (2)
Syr
Attack (5 Inf, 1 Arm, 2 CA, 1 BB)
Rolls: 5@1 3@3 1@4; Total Hits: 35@1: (6, 3, 2, 6, 3)3@3: (2, 1, 6)1@4: (2)
Defense (1 Inf)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
Combat
2 Inf, 2 Art, 1 Arm Nita to Sfr
1 Inf, 1 Art Lib to Tun
1 Mech Tob to Tun
1 Inf Tob to Alx (mt)
1 Inf Eth to Sud (mt)
1 Inf, 1 Art Eth to Ken (mt)
1 Inf Iso to Ken
1 SS SZ 95 to SZ 93
1 Fig, 1 Tac Nita to SZ 93
1 Fig Sita to SZ 93
1 CA, 1 TT SZ 95 to SZ 99, take
2 Inf Sita to Syr
1 CA, 1 BB, 2 TT SZ 97 to SZ 99, take
3 Inf Sita, 1 Arm Alb to Syr
Italy 1
10 IPCs
1 Mech (4)
1 Arm (6)
save 0
I disagree. Russia SHOULD stack Ukraine, if it forces Germany to attack and achieve suffer a Phyrric victory on G2-4.
Ah okay, interesting. Â Fair enough.
I’m more proficient in Global; moves like that tend to blow up in your face more often in that version, considering the scale of the game.
If I’m looking to pluck AK/Hawaii/NZ/Aus away from the Allies, I will commit a carrier w/BB escort with a transport to handle the infedels…that still provides a carrier w/BB protecting the land bridge.
We weren’t suggesting that a sub will be able to take down a CV/BB escort.
Rather-
If you do that, you have to have your remaining TTs in only one group, right? Â Only 60 or 36. Â You can’t do both, with subs ready in the Pacific. Â That’s a big roadblock, if you can’t split up your mainland shucks.
9-10 Inf?
You understand, that if you’re going to be buying subs/fighters and moving defensive forces west like that, that Russia will be able to press a lot harder.
By press harder, I mean stacking Ukraine without you being able to destroy it.
Russia will never stack Ukraine if you have land/air forces in range to destroy them. That will never happen if Russia isn’t bone-headed.
When Hobbes mentioned the allied subs in the Pacific, he means that - without an destroyer buy - Japan will have to have its fleet in two groups.
You said that you’d keep two groups, so fair enough. But that means you can’t take allied holdings in the Pacific or pick infantry off of all your islands.
Oh okay. Looks like you’ve discovered something that no one here has up to date. :lol:
I apologize for questioning you.
Try a couple games here with that strat; see how Russia responds. I think it’ll be a bit more agressive than you think.
My counter to stacking Ukraine is offering it as a gift. I’ll turtle all three territories around E.Europe. Without air power to back up your forces after taking Ukraine, your only hope is the AA gun, but be prepared to lose an AA gun. The Germans will hit your stack with everything. The Russian lines will be no more. Plus if you pull an AA, you’re likely to get IB’d instead.
Uh Russia only stacks Ukraine if Germany can’t take it back.
That’s the only reason to stack it. Â If Germany destroys the Russians in Ukraine, Russia made a huge mistake and Allies should lose.
I can’t think of a good reason to hit 93 on G1.
The cost of 1-2 planes isn’t worth the benefit of removing 2 comparatively useless ships that Italy can kill by itself while losing only around 1 sub.
Killing that 110 death fleet is way more important to both Germany and Italy.
If alive, it swings down to 92 on UK1, joining with the Med fleet. At that point say goodbye to Italy doing anything for the rest of the game. And UK doesn’t have to suicide any fighters into 97.
Buying naval (CV + 2 TT) to threaten Sealion is by far the most beneficial thing you can do for Italy. If UK insists on hitting 97, you take London for cheap. It’s not nearly as powerful as in other versions, but Sealion is still possible. It’s practically guarenteed if UK wants to leave only one of its fighters on London.
Couple changes to US’s non-coms, unaffected by Anzac and others’ rounds-
2 SS SZ 33 to SZ 44
2 SS SZ 33 to SZ 43
SZ 37 cwol
Non-coms
2 Fig Car to Jav
Fleet SZ 54 to SZ 42, take
1 Inf, 1 Art Que to Jav
2 DD SZ 62 to SZ 42
2 Inf Sau to Nsw
Place
1 DD, 1 TT SZ 54
Collect
10 + 5 NO = 15 IPCs
Plus 1 Fig SZ 42 to SZ 37
Attack (1 DD, 1 Fig)
Rolls: 1@2 1@3; Total Hits: 11@2: (4)1@3: (3)
Defense (1 SS)
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (5)
Combat
1 DD SZ 54 to SZ 37