I think the strategy might be viable if you use your bombers for other things as well, deterring allied naval forces, etc.
Posts made by Afrika Korps
-
RE: Focused SBR on Russia with the Axis
-
RE: Focused SBR on Russia with the Axis
If you use your bomber SOLEY for SBR, then it doesn’t yield a great net bonus.
-
RE: Does the Game need cost changes for naval units?
I think it’s fine the way it is.
-
RE: Making UK more exciting
Send the fighter to the American carrier at Hawaii SZ, and use the submarine off Australia to attack the Japanese Solomon submarine. Pull the rest of the units back around Africa is what I usually do as UK.
Of course, if you still own Anglo-Egypt, pull back into the Mediterranean.
-
RE: Newbie Experiences!
First game, we allowed armor(edit- all units for that matter) to attack ships off shore.
-
RE: Comments on Revised A&A (the physical game package)
I didn’t get extra units, but I did get extra chips.
-
RE: Allied options in 8 point game
I prefer either 12 VC or who gives up first.
-
RE: Japan too strong in AA Revised?
I prefer 8 inf. in Yakut. Those 2 extra IPC are not worth taking the amphib hits and the aerial attacks. If you defend in Yakut at least those fighters won’t travel back to the carriers.
-
RE: Kriegsmarine???
That’s incredibly vague. Destroy all of the allies, and win in 4-5 rounds. (No pun intended)
-
RE: Quick questions about this version
1)2 inf.
2)Both forces roll as normal, until the destroyer is destroyed(The DD negates the sub special). Then count the sub hits as sneak attack. Remember that subs can only hit sea units though. -
RE: Nominations for A&A Revised Strategies
I agree with all of that except attacking Borneo with 2 inf. I don’t like to weaken India.
-
RE: Anti-KGF Policy. What should the Axis do?
I think you’re thinking of Axis and Allies, non-revised.
-
RE: 2 Destroyers OR 1 Battleship?
@B.:
The thing is that Germany would NOT have his fighters in France as said before due to that, but in Germant or Gibraltar
@B.:
Any time UK fleet will be in reach of Germany fighters in France he will attack if the odds strongly favor his force!
However, IF the fighters are in Germany, Then UK doesn’t even bother landing in France I just take Germany when I am ready and build up a landing so that you can’t move all units built out of the capital in the meantime, which helps Russia immensely.
If the fighters are are in France, Then UK can a land a ground force there. -edit and destroy the planes-
The navy can land before the fighters get to attack, so they will be fighting land units and cost effective armor and infantry.
-
RE: Anti-KGF Policy. What should the Axis do?
I’d choose NZ before Australia. Take NZ, fake an Australian assault the next turn and actually hit Mexico (your navy can make it).Â
How?
-
RE: Russia Vs Germany
You can’t just ‘stall the allies in the west’ and go all out for Russia, all the while conquering Africa. It won’t work against a competent Allied player. You’ve not enough units. You can’t spend only 16 IC a turn to both conquer Africa and stall the allies and even then, you’d only have 24 to deal with Russia.
-
RE: Anti-KGF Policy. What should the Axis do?
It’s KGF, yo, you should be able to defeat the US navy and get the 2 IC + 1 from NZ, which adds up. (1 inf per turn)
-
RE: Anti-KGF Policy. What should the Axis do?
I think that attacking India and Australia is a better bet than invading Alaska, Japan has only 8 industrial capacity.
-
RE: !BORNEO!
Would you please clarify what you mean? I’m talking about sending a ftr there as Japan on the counter-attack.
-
RE: Anti-KGF Policy. What should the Axis do?
I say attack India and Australia as quickly as possible with Japan, using your airforce to advance.
-
RE: 2 Destroyers OR 1 Battleship?
On WHAT move? You said they’d be in France, so now it’s my(edit for clarity: UK) turn, and I land. When in this do you get to move anything? The navy can land on a province before any fighters can attack the fleet.