<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Flying Fortresses]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I read once on the Larry Harris forum an opinion that the B-29 Supper Fortress NA from Revised was 'broken".  I agree, and have decided to fix it.  I dub this new US National Advantage:</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Flying Fortresses</strong><br />
If your bombers are intercepted on a Strategic Bombing Run, they may act as a flying AA gun and fire on each intercepting fighter at a 1 (2 for Heavy Bombers).</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/8685/flying-fortresses</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:58:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/8685.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:46:11 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Flying Fortresses on Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:34:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">In my house rules, all bombers receive a roll @1 when defending against interceptors. I would consider flying fortresses defending @2 when defending from air units during a raid.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/post/154422</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/post/154422</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Young Grasshopper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:34:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>