The A&A rules regarding neutrals, (AAR&AA50) are not realistic, they’re unhistorical, and it makes the game more “boring”, in the sense that allowing for neutrals to be attacked would make a more interesting and fun game.
In Europe, many countries were neutral in 1939, and before that, but when the war began, they were occupied. This didn’t only happen to Norway, but many other nations as well.
Hitler had many plans, one of them was Operation Tannenbaum. It was one of the plans which didn’t make it from theory to reality. Some countries were invaded and some got away, it was not up to the smaller nations, but the big 5.
If Germany didn’t invade Norway, it could very well be UK instead. Or we could be lucky, and keep our “neutrality”.
When Larry Harris explains some of the rules, he often states that “In WW2……during the war…”.
There are many factors that are implemented in A&A which happened in the real war.
So why not keep the neutrality rules from classic, or make some minor changes.
There are no good reasons why we can’t attack “neutral” countries, when it happened in the real WW2!