But perhaps the main point would be to make it as balanced as possible? Not as good as possible. If you found out 12 ipcs to china would make for a balanced game, maybe that would be the best solution?
I agree with this statement as much as possible. If we’re going to bid, it might as well reflect the changes in A&A:50 as a NEW game. I’m sorry but extra infantry/tanks in the Caucuses or in Egypt screams a retread of A&A over and over again. It may help the Allies win easiest, which is what they’ve always been doing with KGF.
Lets put those extra IPCs in China (or the Pacific) so that those 32243 extra rules about China are worth memorizing.
played 2 day……us fleet takes iwo jima and puts a couple subs in sz that contains japan.
uk fleet blocks italia’s fleet in med. on atlantic side uk forces take norway w/ 1 tank
ussr reinforces moscow and a uk fighter assists.
germany’s turn next
Just as other ships may, submarines may also move out of a sea zone where they begin their turn with enemy ships, even destroyers. The destroyer doesn’t stop the sub’s movement, as the sub didn’t enter the sea zone - it started off there.