@marechallannes:
@Bluestroke:
I have a hunch the most likely units Craig says are missing;
this would be a lite, add on for missing units from pics
items:Subs, completely absent from Pacific theatre.Add 1 for each power.
item:DD in Eastern Med.
item:BMB from Japan. everyone has one, except Italy and China and now Japan, less likely?
item:CA, for USA Pacific Fleet, WUSA? new unit missing from USA setup.
item:if China generates qty 1 INF for each territory, S/B at least 1 INF in each of the Chinese territories to start? Again, the Sino-Japan war was in full swing.
item:ARM unit for Eastern USA, as noted in prior post-USA start w with no ARM unit?
Last item, my own Lust, the Second Japanese Battlewagon in the Sea of Japan with CT,
not likely, its an emotional need-LOL.
Sounds nice, but where to place the japanese Sub and the US Sub?
I don’t agree with the second US carrier. In 1941 the US Navy had only two Essex class Carriers (Yorktown and Essex I think). At the time of the attack on pearl habour they had left the pacific fleet for maneuvers.
…and I want this second jap BB, too!
Item:Marechallannes;
No, I did not mean/say a second USA-CV carrier. That was a CA for USA cruiser.
Happy to hear, the thunder of battlewagons are heard by others-LOL.
Item:Subotai, great question;
Krieghund/andor Craig can you guys comment on IPC values of Territories?
I could not see several territories IPC values, as I drew the map, so, stated on map.
I used derived totals for the territories I could not see.
So, I would second, the request, to verify, IPC values if possible.
item:IL, Lynxes and timeover51 great posts as usual;
nice touch with numbers on vessels and the individual ship names and classes
-sweet as my grandson would say.
One caveat, I think Larry stated, on his web site, Naval units, of all A&A units, could not be extrapolated/translated to numbers?