“but if your measuring who exactly is the best strategist you probably should look at the kind of game where its more dynamic.”
Really.
So I suppose it would be MORE strategic if you decided to throw drunken cats at your Axis and Allies board. Arguably, such a game would require FAR more strategic decisions and be FAR more dynamic, requiring decisions regarding what sort of beer your cat prefers, what sort of beer you prefer, whether or not a cat can be classified as a biological weapon under the Geneva convention, the moral implications of using cat-based weaponry on plastic civilians, possible legal implications involving the ASPCA, as well as such mundane variables as age, size, and weight of cat, air-speed velocity, and all this even before considering the question of how knocking variable pieces off the board would affect the Axis and Allies game (or how throwing drunken cats around would affect, say, your marriage.)
In fact, a real strategist - a REAL strategist would not only be able to adapt to such a situation, but would thrive, yes? Perhaps you are such a strategist, IL? Seeing as how you are able to control factors that OTHER people would perhaps think were not under your control, you must indeed be a master of strategy.
I give you a popsicle stick, a stick of chewing gum, a paperclip, and forty-two seconds. I would like the report of how you conquered Switzerland with these resources on my desk by Friday.