But the ICÂ´s can allso be used as “anchors” to defend the mainland from US/USSR double team grabs. (with can be nasty for the Axis)
But im all for the hit Japan first thing (not neccesarily killing him), but he canÂ´t be let free to roam Asia/Africa/Australia-new zeeland… itÂ´s devestating for the allies, and more importantly the Russians.
If russia stacks Buryatia, puts 2 arm in yakut, UK kills the kwang trn (witch i failed to do twice in a row…), UK attacks FIC with 3 inf, 1 fig, lands fig in Sinkiang), Assembles UK Pacific fleet in SZ30.
USA can then choose how to do things, same for Russia and UK on turn 2.
Germany and Japan have allready shown their hand, and with 1 Trn Buryatia attack is risky, even if Pearl is ignored, if Fic was wiped, China will be harder, Sinkiang IC would look tempting.
If japan ignores pearl US have got a free carrier/sub/fig that can be nasty in the long run…
But my bottom line is Japan canÂ´t be set loose unrestrained.