MOVED: Xeno Games's World at War (1939 version of A&A)

I played through the first couple of levels for the Xbox 360. It’s not a bad FPS and the story line for the game is pretty good. However, it plays just like the Ghost Recon series on 360 and it really has not outstanding qualities that I saw. I personally would go with Rainbos Six Vegas 2, so far it’s much better.

Oh nevermind I will just quit being so cheep and buy the damn thing.

I’m sorry I don’t understand what each player represents, are you different middle eastern countries or maybe international peace organizations.

Because if your something like the UN or a NGO shouldn’t your goals be to protect terrorist safe heavens and combat ethnic cleansing with non-violence

And if your suppose to be a Middle Eastern country wouldn’t your goals be to blow stuff up( I mean a dictator is little more than and A&A player that turns fantasy into reality)

Or are you God because he would just flood everything and start over

Link not work

Some more details (interviews) from the devs: http://thegamershub.co.uk/2010/03/hubcast-05/ and http://www.massively.com/2010/03/22/interview-with-world-of-tanks-mike-zhivets/

I like both pretty equally. With regards to what you said about RTS skill being about memorizing hotkeys and such, I don’t bother attaining enough skill in this department just to be better at the game. (Maybe this is why I still haven’t beaten Starcraft or Warcraft 3?) But I still love RTS because of the fast-paced decision making! On the other hand, Turn-based is awesome because it allows alot of time for decision making. So as long as it’s one of the two extremes, I’m good to go. 😄

C&C Generals is thpptptpt…Lame game

Anybody going to Origins??? I’m bringing and running my pimped out Memoir 44 Dday set there. Anybody interested???