Thanks for clarifying.
Incorrect wording on the Italian NO
-
The Italian national objective states that Italy gets it, if there are no “Allied ships” in the Med, rather than “Allied surface warships”.
-
Panther Moderator Official Q&A 2023 '22 '21 '20 '19 '18 '17 '16 '15 '14 '13 '12 TripleA last edited by
@CaptainNapalm Well observed. The game notes can never mirror the complexity of rulebooks, however that would be an easy correction/clarification/fix.
Would you please address this issue here:
https://github.com/triplea-maps/world_war_ii_global/issuesThank you,
-
@Panther I posted the issue on GitHub.
-
Panther Moderator Official Q&A 2023 '22 '21 '20 '19 '18 '17 '16 '15 '14 '13 '12 TripleA last edited by
@CaptainNapalm I have just noticed that. Thank you!
-
Just checking, it’s not just the wording of the NO but the way the rule is applied by the engine, right? Because I’m pretty sure in my last few games, a sub in the Med was enough to cancel out the NO when this shouldn’t have been the case.
-
Panther Moderator Official Q&A 2023 '22 '21 '20 '19 '18 '17 '16 '15 '14 '13 '12 TripleA last edited by Panther
@freh said in Incorrect wording on the Italian NO:
Just checking, it’s not just the wording of the NO but the way the rule is applied by the engine, right? Because I’m pretty sure in my last few games, a sub in the Med was enough to cancel out the NO when this shouldn’t have been the case.
I cannot reproduce that. Look here (click the image to enlarge it):
-
My bad on this one Panther. I just finished a game where I thought subs were denying the NO, but it seems even when the allied fleets left the Med, there was at least one dd or ac remaining. Sorry about that!
Suggested Topics
