Is there a set up to play 1942 on a global board?

AnA Faster Rearranged Rounds MOD.pdf

My home brew attempt to stream line the games. I only have the 2004 edition but i tried to write it generically.

Interested in ways to make it more clear and if there are issues with other versions

Thanks,

There is no SZ # in the SZ directly north of 94.

Additionally I would recommend that you eliminate the 4 way intersection between SZ 92, 97, 94 and the unmarked SZ.

why is the topic GLOBAL 1939?

If you’re going for Amerika Bombers, why not also consider the HE277, JU-390 (ooo, six engined), or the TA-400.  Also, the HE-274 would be appropriate.

Ya if you want info on the progress just keep an eye on the FMG pieces project disscusion link in “other axis and allies variants”. It is an epic 2 year journey, but when they get here it will be worth it.

@onetthome:

These seem pretty cool, I’ll be sure to print the rules. I’m not seeing any rules for the Pacific though  :|

I appreciate the compliments from you and from Georgemak!

I’m currently putting the final touches on another rules set–a more advanced one. As is also the case for the rules set under discussion, this rules set is designed with a global war in mind. But that being said, I wouldn’t object to a custom map designer creating a Pacific scenario.

Every time I create a rules set like this, I try to build something generic enough that a custom map designer will have a lot of room in which to work. Working within the general framework, a custom map designer could create his own starting map, nations list, national advantages, disadvantages, and available technologies for each nation, starting unit setup, and other adjustments. The rules set is intended to give map designers plenty of room in which to exercise their creativity.

But my greatest current need is for a software developer. If anyone here is a developer or knows a developer who might be interested in something like this, please PM me.

I believe I may have VP locations set, along with solid win / loss numbers.  I need to play through a few more games with these rules, but this is very close (if not the) final product.  Still, I’d like some input from you guys.

The Axis win if they have a total of 27 VPs (they start with 20) for 2 whole turns (they must hold the locations), and the Allies win if the axis have 10 vp for 2 wholes turns.

(edit: I realize now that 27 is insanely high, and is very hard to obtain and is a pretty decisive victory.  25 seems like a good number; the Allies have to get off of their asses to take away a victory point or two to even things out before the Axis make a big breakthrough on one of the fronts [which will net 2 or 3 VPs, with a fourth probably not far off]).

VP LOCATIONS: Listed by nation, and also showing how many VPs each territory is worth (1 is minor, 2 is major).

Germany:
East Germany - 2
West Germany - 2
Italy - 2
France - 1
Austria - 1
Norway - 1
Ukraine - 1

Japan:
Southern Japan - 2
Northern Japan - 2
Chosen - 2
Shantung - 1
Thai-Malay - 1
North Philippines - 1
New Guinea - 1

Russia:
Moscow - 2
Leningrad - 2
Stalingrad - 2
Sverdlosk - 1
Archangel’sk - 1
Vladivostok - 1

United Kingdom:
England - 2
Scotland - 2
Bombay - 2
New South Wales - 2
Eastern Canada - 2
Burma - 1
Egypt - 1
Iraq - 1
South Africa - 1

China:
Western Sinkiang - 2
Kansu - 1

United States:
Northeastern United States - 2
Southwestern United States - 2
Widwestern United States - 2
Southern United States - 1
Northwestern United States - 1
Hawaiian Islands - 1
Alaska - 1
Central America - 1

Tell me what you think.

Hi all!

I was looking at the incomplete map at

http://www.axisdomain.0catch.com/Advanced_A&A_Map.jpg

which was listed above in the thread, and I am very interested in knowing where I can see a final version of this.

There are some minor gaffes in the version current on this thread (‘Sain’ instead of ‘Spain’, for instance) but it looks a lot of fun.

Can anybody tell me anything more about this map?

If you could send me a personal e-mail to caractacus@hotmail.com, that would be great, otherwise I’ll try to check back here…

Cheers!

Caractacus.