Axis n allies global 2nd edition disscussion
Sgt Mclusky last edited by
So once the main strats came out such as Calcutta Crush and Sealion. Along with Barbarossa. Do the high level players start to migrate to the other game global 1936-1945 because the 1940 global turns into the same game over and over ? Or is it because it is bloated to reflect the actual events so that players feel they have more options to make so the game doesn’t get stale quickly? I was curious because it seemed that after the grasshopper invitational and sirebloods bloodbath tourney. It seemed that a lot of the attention went to the new global 1936. I love the game but to me there is a fine line between finishing a game in a day and having to have a free weekend to Finnish the war.
M36 last edited by
@Sgt-Mclusky Unlike previous renditions of A+A I find that AA40 has so many options and paths to victory that were still playing it and seeing new strategies in my group. Granted I was late to the party with this version so I don’t have years of experience, but we do play an awful lot, and almost never see the same game twice.
If you're having problems, please send an email to email@example.com