here is some statistic on what people bid in bm306-03.PNG
19L axis-dominion (+4) vs KILL!!! (allies) bm3
-
ok let’s see what’s going on here…
-
whoops got to go to bed… tomorrow
-
ok no problem. I’ll do italy tonight anyway
-
TripleA Turn Summary: Italians round 18
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 3.3
Game History
Round: 18 Purchase Units - Italians Italians buy 1 airfield; Remaining resources: 17 PUs; Combat Move - Italians 1 submarine moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from Western Germany to 112 Sea Zone 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 112 Sea Zone to 111 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from 111 Sea Zone to Scotland 2 fighters moved from Western Germany to 119 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Western Germany to 119 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Caucasus to Rostov 1 fighter moved from Northwest Persia to Rostov Combat - Italians Battle in Scotland Battle in Rostov Italians attack with 1 fighter and 1 infantry Russians defend with 1 infantry Italians roll dice for 1 fighter and 1 infantry in Rostov, round 2 : 1/2 hits, 0.67 expected hits Russians roll dice for 1 infantry in Rostov, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Russians and 1 infantry owned by the Italians lost in Rostov Italians win, taking Scotland from British with 1 fighter remaining. Battle score for attacker is 0 Casualties for Italians: 1 infantry Casualties for Russians: 1 infantry Battle in 119 Sea Zone Italians attack with 1 bomber, 2 fighters and 1 submarine Americans defend with 1 destroyer Italians roll dice for 1 submarine in 119 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Italians roll dice for 1 bomber and 2 fighters in 119 Sea Zone, round 2 : 3/3 hits, 1.67 expected hits Americans roll dice for 1 destroyer in 119 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 destroyer owned by the Americans lost in 119 Sea Zone Italians win, taking 119 Sea Zone from Neutral with 1 bomber, 2 fighters and 1 submarine remaining. Battle score for attacker is 8 Casualties for Americans: 1 destroyer Non Combat Move - Italians 1 bomber moved from 119 Sea Zone to Western Germany 2 fighters moved from 119 Sea Zone to 112 Sea Zone 3 marines moved from Western Germany to 112 Sea Zone 1 battleship, 2 cruisers, 1 destroyer and 3 marines moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 1 battleship, 2 cruisers, 1 destroyer and 3 marines moved from 119 Sea Zone to 109 Sea Zone 3 marines moved from 109 Sea Zone to Scotland 1 aaGun, 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Caucasus to Northwest Persia 1 fighter moved from Rostov to Northwest Persia 1 infantry moved from Western Germany to Germany 1 infantry moved from Northern Italy to Yugoslavia 1 fighter moved from Eastern Poland to Northwest Persia 1 mech_infantry moved from Eastern Poland to Novgorod Place Units - Italians 1 airfield placed in Northern Italy Turn Complete - Italians Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 11 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 93 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,2 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 97 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,6,1,6,2,1,3,3 Italians collect 6 PUs (11 lost to blockades); end with 23 PUs Objective Italians 1 Control The Mediterranean: Italians met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 28 PUs Objective Italians 4 Control Iraq Or Persia Or Northwest Persia: Italians met a national objective for an additional 2 PUs; end with 30 PUsCombat Hit Differential Summary :
Italians : 1.33 Americans : -0.33 Russians : 0.67 -
TripleA Turn Summary: French round 18
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 3.3
Game History
Round: 18 Purchase Units - ANZAC ANZAC buy 1 submarine and 1 transport; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - ANZAC 2 infantry moved from Queensland to 54 Sea Zone 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 54 Sea Zone to 46 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from 46 Sea Zone to New Guinea Combat - ANZAC Battle in New Guinea Non Combat Move - ANZAC 1 submarine moved from 43 Sea Zone to 44 Sea Zone 1 artillery moved from New South Wales to Queensland 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer moved from 54 Sea Zone to 56 Sea Zone Place Units - ANZAC 1 transport placed in 62 Sea Zone 1 submarine placed in 54 Sea Zone Turn Complete - ANZAC ANZAC collect 10 PUs; end with 10 PUs Objective ANZAC 3 Pacific Supply Lines: ANZAC met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 13 PUs Objective ANZAC 2 Control Strategic Islands: ANZAC met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 16 PUs Combat Move - French 1 destroyer moved from 58 Sea Zone to 41 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Iraq to Algeria Combat - French Battle in 41 Sea Zone French attack with 1 destroyer Japanese defend with 1 submarine French roll dice for 1 destroyer in 41 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 41 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.17 expected hits French roll dice for 1 destroyer in 41 Sea Zone, round 3 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 41 Sea Zone, round 3 : 0/1 hits, 0.17 expected hits French roll dice for 1 destroyer in 41 Sea Zone, round 4 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 41 Sea Zone, round 4 : 0/1 hits, 0.17 expected hits French roll dice for 1 destroyer in 41 Sea Zone, round 5 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 41 Sea Zone, round 5 : 0/1 hits, 0.17 expected hits French roll dice for 1 destroyer in 41 Sea Zone, round 6 : 1/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 41 Sea Zone, round 6 : 0/1 hits, 0.17 expected hits 1 submarine owned by the Japanese lost in 41 Sea Zone French win, taking 41 Sea Zone from Japanese with 1 destroyer remaining. Battle score for attacker is 6 Casualties for Japanese: 1 submarine Non Combat Move - French Turn Complete - FrenchCombat Hit Differential Summary :
French : -0.67 Japanese : -0.83 -
ok let’s do this! scramble decision will be coming up
-
TripleA Move Summary: Germans round 19
TripleA Move Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 3.3
Game History
Round: 19 Research Technology - Germans Purchase Units - Germans Germans repair damage of 6x factory_minor; Remaining resources: 71 PUs; Germans buy 4 fighters, 3 infantry, 4 mech_infantrys and 1 submarine; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - Germans 5 artilleries, 7 infantry and 1 marine moved from Western Germany to 112 Sea Zone 5 artilleries, 7 infantry and 6 transports moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 1 cruiser and 1 marine moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 5 artilleries, 7 infantry and 6 transports moved from 119 Sea Zone to 109 Sea Zone 1 cruiser and 1 marine moved from 119 Sea Zone to 109 Sea Zone 5 artilleries, 7 infantry and 1 marine moved from 109 Sea Zone to United Kingdom 1 bomber moved from Northern Italy to 109 Sea Zone 8 fighters and 7 tactical_bombers moved from Northern Italy to United Kingdom 1 bomber moved from Yugoslavia to 109 Sea Zone 3 carriers, 2 destroyers and 2 fighters moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 3 carriers and 2 fighters moved from 119 Sea Zone to 109 Sea Zone 2 destroyers moved from 119 Sea Zone to 109 Sea Zone 4 tactical_bombers moved from Western Germany to United Kingdom 4 fighters moved from 112 Sea Zone to United Kingdom 1 bomber moved from Western Germany to United Kingdom 3 bombers moved from Germany to United Kingdom 1 bomber moved from Germany to United Kingdom 1 bomber moved from Germany to United Kingdom 1 infantry moved from Northwest Persia to Persia 2 armour moved from Northwest Persia to Persia 2 mech_infantrys moved from Northwest Persia to Persia 1 infantry moved from Caucasus to Rostov Germans take Rostov from Russians 8 infantry moved from Northwest Persia to Iraq 15 mech_infantrys moved from Northwest Persia to Iraq 15 armour moved from Northwest Persia to Iraq 3 armour and 3 mech_infantrys moved from Northwest Persia to Iraq 2 armour and 2 mech_infantrys moved from Northwest Persia to Iraq -
scramble to 109 ?
-
@Karl7 it isn’t polite to keep your German guests waiting…they wish to join the British for some tea in London :yum:
-
-
Yeah, I am starting to think G40 might be broken. An excellent player like yourself as Axis is too powerful with those Italians… if it weren’t for the can opener, there’d be so much more the Allies could do.
But as it, they have to 2X everything to contain the Axis, which they can’t/
-
The only other thing I can think of would be to crash harder into Europe, but again that would mean Japan out of control.
-
well good game then!
actually, now that the match is over, I’ll explain where you could’ve gotten me better:
- you did not have a single American available in London to threaten a landing in Norway or holland even. without that kind of threat, the axis had it easy defending those territories. they didn’t need a lot of resources to guard, as the brits alone can’t stack enough to pose as a credible threat.
- you didn’t have a single American bomber or even tac in London that could’ve possibly threatened to disable my AB in w.ger, which would potentially allow you to then strike at my navy. this would of course require more resources to guard against.
- you didn’t have a single American to threaten a landing in n.italy, greece, or yugo. this would’ve been a huge concern for the axis and they’d have to invest more in defending these lands.
doing any or all of the above actually wouldn’t have required a lot of investment from the Americans, so it wouldn’t take that much away from their campaign against Japan. I mean even ONE transport to threaten Norway or Southern Europe might have made such a difference!
then there is Russia. man with Germany pushing hard on the Middle East, Russia with its massive force could’ve sent HALF of it lunging into Europe. that’d be very hard and scary for the axis to counter, which would definitely thwart any intentions to invade London and would definitely make me reconsider my push into the Middle East. I think you played too conservatively and defensively with russia.
-
@axis-dominion said in 19L axis-dominion (+4) vs KILL!!! (allies) bm3:
well good game then!
actually, now that the match is over, I’ll explain where you could’ve gotten me better:
- you did not have a single American available in London to threaten a landing in Norway or holland even. without that kind of threat, the axis had it easy defending those territories. they didn’t need a lot of resources to guard, as the brits alone can’t stack enough to pose as a credible threat.
- you didn’t have a single American bomber or even tac in London that could’ve possibly threatened to disable my AB in w.ger, which would potentially allow you to then strike at my navy. this would of course require more resources to guard against.
- you didn’t have a single American to threaten a landing in n.italy, greece, or yugo. this would’ve been a huge concern for the axis and they’d have to invest more in defending these lands.
doing any or all of the above actually wouldn’t have required a lot of investment from the Americans, so it wouldn’t take that much away from their campaign against Japan. I mean even ONE transport to threaten Norway or Southern Europe might have made such a difference!
then there is Russia. man with Germany pushing hard on the Middle East, Russia with its massive force could’ve sent HALF of it lunging into Europe. that’d be very hard and scary for the axis to counter, which would definitely thwart any intentions to invade London and would definitely make me reconsider my push into the Middle East. I think you played too conservatively and defensively with russia.
Good points, especially about no enough pressure on W Europe. I sense that as well.
As for Russia, I think you are underestimating the threat there. If Russia moved a main inf stack more than 1 space away from Moscow, you could’ve rushed back in range of hitting Moscow. That was the double threat I was talking about. I couldn’t block you because of the Italians. I needed almost all to be in range of Moscow to stop a strike.
-
man you had like a massive RAF, like 20 and eventually 30+ air, now imagine if you landed some Americans in n.ita, and then flew all that massive airforce to stack it. BAM! of course I would try to prevent that from happening, which would require me to turtle up more and my offensive campaigns into russia and the Middle East would be significantly impacted. time was not on my side for sure.
-
@Karl7 said in 19L axis-dominion (+4) vs KILL!!! (allies) bm3:
@axis-dominion said in 19L axis-dominion (+4) vs KILL!!! (allies) bm3:
well good game then!
actually, now that the match is over, I’ll explain where you could’ve gotten me better:
- you did not have a single American available in London to threaten a landing in Norway or holland even. without that kind of threat, the axis had it easy defending those territories. they didn’t need a lot of resources to guard, as the brits alone can’t stack enough to pose as a credible threat.
- you didn’t have a single American bomber or even tac in London that could’ve possibly threatened to disable my AB in w.ger, which would potentially allow you to then strike at my navy. this would of course require more resources to guard against.
- you didn’t have a single American to threaten a landing in n.italy, greece, or yugo. this would’ve been a huge concern for the axis and they’d have to invest more in defending these lands.
doing any or all of the above actually wouldn’t have required a lot of investment from the Americans, so it wouldn’t take that much away from their campaign against Japan. I mean even ONE transport to threaten Norway or Southern Europe might have made such a difference!
then there is Russia. man with Germany pushing hard on the Middle East, Russia with its massive force could’ve sent HALF of it lunging into Europe. that’d be very hard and scary for the axis to counter, which would definitely thwart any intentions to invade London and would definitely make me reconsider my push into the Middle East. I think you played too conservatively and defensively with russia.
Good points, especially about no enough pressure on W Europe. I sense that as well.
As for Russia, I think you are underestimating the threat there. If Russia moved a main inf stack more than 1 space away from Moscow, you could’ve rushed back in range of hitting Moscow. That was the double threat I was talking about. I couldn’t block you because of the Italians. I needed almost all to be in range of Moscow to stop a strike.
well no, because you also had a massive airforce that could be flown to aid Moscow in a pinch.
-
what we could do for fun is, I could take over your allies at a few rounds earlier, and we can see if my points are valid at all.
want to try that?
-
Nah, I never like to relive old games, especially ones I feel demoralized about.
Besides, I agree mostly anyway, just not about Russia. It was hamstrung more than I think you appreciate.
-
No problem. Well whenever you’re up for a rematch just HMU. We can take a couple days break and then kick off another one if you want.
-
Are you getting soft?
KILL!
Suggested Topics
