• '21 '20 '18 '17

    Love it. While chess isn’t my personal favorite, it is a model for wargaming. Its amazing that with such a limited set of starting options and pieces, that the game has a tremendous following and has, in all its variants, for centuries.

    Some people believe that the sides in chess are equal. This is a misconception; the players start with symmetrical forces, but the White player has + one more unit of initiative, and the Black player has + one more piece of information (what White did). This is a good analogy to our favorite game, and is the starting point for all “asymmetrical” wargames, where the players share common units types and resources, but are each different and unique.


  • @taamvan said in Pearl Harbour Attack:

    Love it. While chess isn’t my personal favorite, it is a model for wargaming. Its amazing that with such a limited set of starting options and pieces, that the game has a tremendous following and has, in all its variants, for centuries.

    Some people believe that the sides in chess are equal. This is a misconception; the players start with symmetrical forces, but the White player has + one more unit of initiative, and the Black player has + one more piece of information (what White did). This is a good analogy to our favorite game, and is the starting point for all “asymmetrical” wargames, where the players share common units types and resources, but are each different and unique.

    I once heard about a Russian chess grandmaster (I forget who, so I’ll call him So-and-So) who was asked whether he prefers to play the white or black pieces. He answered: “It makes no difference to me. When I play white, I win because I play first. When I play black, I win because I am So-and-So.”


  • Thanks again for another round of excellent and interesting feedback!

    As you might have figured so far, I am more like Jorgen Bent Larsen, preferring onorthodox strategies based on surprise and deception. Ofcourse it really helps that my group only plays a game twice a year and now after two years I am Axis again (while both allies will play their nations for the first time in 2 again). I am also the only one that studies this forum inside out as his hobby. This makes my playstyle ofcourse more suitable than hardened TripleA veterans. There is therefore reason to believe they might act as I expect them to act. I do really not mind if I win with a Fool’s Mate the first time I use it, actually I would love it!

    Nevertheless Argothair you are absolutely right it is important to be realistic, run battles with a battle calculator in advance and have a detailed plan in how I expect to have a certain amount of units somewhere (India battle). I have improved all my past strategies by sharing it on these forums as you pointed out the wrong assumptions and weak parts. So thats what I will do again.

    Japan 1

    J1 purchase:
    • 3 Transport

    Combat move:
    SZ 26:
    • 1 submarine (SZ 6)
    • 2 destroyers (SZ 6)
    • 2 fighters (SZ 6)
    • 2 tactical bombers (SZ 6)

    SZ 35:
    • 1 Submarine (SZ 19)
    • 1 Destroyer (SZ 19)
    • 1 Cruiser (SZ 6)
    • 1 Battleship (SZ 19)
    • 2 Transports (1 Tank, 1 Artillery, 2 Infantry) – Japan, Okinawa

    SZ 37:
    • 1 Cruiser (SZ 20)
    • 1 Bomber (Japan)
    • 1 Fighter (Formosa)

    SZ: 43 :
    • 1 Transport (1 Artillery, 1 Infantry) (SZ 20)

    Philippines
    • 1 Tactical Bomber (SZ 35)
    • 1 Fighter (SZ 35)
    • 1 Tank (Japan)
    • 1 Artillery (Japan)
    • 2 Infantry (Japan)

    Borneo
    • 1 Infantry (Kiangsi)

    Shan State
    • 2 Infantry (Siam)

    French Indo China
    • 1 Infantry (Kwangsi)

    Yunnan
    • 1 Bomber (Japan)
    • 1 Tactical Bomber (Kiangsu)
    • 1 Fighter (Kiangsu)
    • 1 Artillery (Kwangsi)
    • 2 Infantry (Kwangsi)

    Kwantung
    • 2 Infantry (Kiangsi)
    • 2 Tactical Bombers (Japan)
    • 2 Fighters (Japan + Okinawa)

    Hunnan
    • 1 Infantry (Kiangsi)
    • 2 Tactical Bombers (Manchuria)
    • 2 Fighters (Manchuria)

    Chahar
    • 1 Infantry (Jehol)

    Anhwe
    • 1 Mechanized Infantry (Manchuria)
    • 7 Infantry (Kiangsu, Shantung, Jehol)
    • 3 Artillery (Kiangsu, Shantung, Jehol)

    Noncombat move:
    SZ42
    • 1 Destroyer (from SZ33)

    SZ35
    • 1 Aircraft Carrier (from SZ33)

    Jehol
    • 1 AA, 1 Artillery, 2 Infantry (Manchuria)

    SZ31
    • 2 Aircraft Carriers
    • 1 Battleship

    Kwangsi
    • Used air craft

    SZ31
    • 2 Fighters (from Korea + Japan) when needed

    Placements:
    • 3 Transports in SZ6

    Income:

    $41 Income
    $4 Extra
    = $45

    Japan 2
    Purchase new units

    • 1 Naval Base in French Indo China
    • 1 Destroyer
    • 3 Transports

    Combat Movement

    Yunnan (if needed, otherwise target Malaya)
    • 2 Infantry (Shan State)
    • 1 Infantry (French Indo China)
    • 1 Mechanized Infantry (Anhwe)
    • 6 Tactical Bombers
    • 6 Fighters (assuming 1 died against UK BB)
    • 2 Bombers

    Java (Battleship + Cruiser)
    • 1 Tank (Philippines)
    • 1 Infantry (Palau Islands)

    Celebes
    • 1 Artillery (Philippines)

    Sumatra (Full Carrier + Destroyer)
    • 1 Infantry (Borneo)
    • 1 Artillery (Borneo)

    Chinese Territories (Suiyuyan, Hopei, Kweichow, Hunan)
    • 3 Artillery
    • 8 Infantry

    UK / ANZAC fleets when possible instead of guarding transports

    Noncombat movement

    SZ 30
    • 2 Aircraft Carriers
    • 1 Battleship

    SZ 6
    • 1 Cruiser (S35)

    SZ36
    • 3 Loaded Transports (Unload FIC)

    Shan State
    • All planes

    Place new units

    • Transport in SZ6
    • Factory in French Indo China
    • Naval Base in French Indo China

    Collect Income

    $56 Income
    $5 Island Bonus
    = $61

    Japan 3
    Purchase new units

    Combat Movement

    India (5 transports supported by 1 battleship, 1 carrier, 1 cruiser, 1 destroyer)
    • 1 Tank (Sumatra)
    • 5 Infantry (French Indo China, Sumatra, Java)
    • 4 Artillery (French Indo China, Sumatra, Java)
    • 6 Tactical Bombers (Shan State)
    • 6 Fighters (Shan State)
    • 2 Bombers (Shan State)

    Likely UK Forces: 2 Fighters, 1 Tactical, 15 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 2 AA Guns
    According to my battle calculations, that gives me 97.3% to win.

    Hawaii (3 Transport, 1 Carrier, 1 Cruiser)
    • 6 Infantry (Korea)
    • 2 Fighters
    • 2 Tactical Bombers

    Chinese Territories (Kansu, Shensi, Szechwan, Yunnan)
    • 3 Artillery
    • 8 Infantry (minus casualties J2)

    Noncombat movement

    SZ 9
    • 1 Destroyer (S6)

    SZ 12
    • 1 Battleship (S30)

    SZ 11
    • 1 Carrier (S30)

    Shan State
    • All planes

    Place new units

    Collect Income

    $63 Income
    $5 Island Bonus
    $10 City Bonus
    $ 9 UK Bonus
    = $87

    Quirky Turtle, very good to point this out! I will bring 1 cruiser to S6 in J2 + build a destroyer. I could keep 1 or 2 fighters in Japan that then fight in sea battle of Hawaii, depending on how much fighters there are stationed.


  • Back on topic
    I agree with most of the comments here but love the idea and look forward to try this cripple the us early and end them in panic mode as there is no fleet left.

    @Afrikakorps said in Pearl Harbour Attack:

    I hope (and assume) my pearl harbour attack with german sub in atlantic and philippines invasion will influence the USA to be more defensive in the first two turns, building up his fleet (having lost 3/4 of his fleets in J1). This gives me breathing space to manoeuvre my fleet and have unprotected transports build in S6.

    One crucial thing to note US can still attack your unprotected transports. 1 fighter from hawaii flies to SZ6 and lands on the carrier from SZ10 in SZ7 while the fighter that was on the carrier lands in Hawaii.
    No thread of a landing as the transports are gone so no need to panic and just slow build up while japan loses a build and since they don’t take Hawaii miss the naval range to be effective.
    This has almost cost me a game once. It was due to the forgiving nature of my opponents that they let me correct the mistake after having spotted my error after combat had been conducted.

  • '19 '18

    Here are some other wrinkles that come to mind that need to be wrestled with. #3 is probably the hardest to work around.

    1. Japan Air Units: For air units to hit India on J3, you need to take and hold one of Yunnan or Shan State on J1 and keep it until J2. This isn’t realistic since China can overwhelm Yunnan on C1 and UK can overwhelm Shan State on UK1. (you could bypass this with an airbase on FIC/Kwangsi on J2, but that will cost you 2 transports headed for Hawaii.)
    2. India Blockers: To get the 3 transports purchased on J1 to India on J3 requires SZ37 be open and one of SZ38/SZ41 be open. It will be tricky for your stripped-down southern fleet to hold two sea zones from getting cleared and a blocker slipping in. You need to survive potentially:
      • UK -> 2 destroyers, 1 cruiser, 2 fighters, 1 tactical
      • ANZAC -> 3 fighters, 1 destroyer, 1 cruiser
      • France -> 1 destroyer
    3. West India UK2 Retreat: The UK player can stall by retreating to West India on UK2. Assuming the UK1 purchase was 3 infantry and 2 artillery (not uncommon) UK could easily have 12 infantry, 3 artillery, 2 fighters and 1 tactical on West India without even talking about transported units or planes from the Med. That’s more than enough to re-take India on UK3 from the 12 ground units landing there.

  • Good points. I want to take out the Money Islands + India + lock the burma road as soon as possible, the rest is less important. This gambit is too easily prevented by the Allies and is more likely to result in a swift break down of Japan, as I am especially afraid of #2.

    I will not do Pearl Harbour.

    I will first focus 100% on getting the money islands and India, then go for either Sydney or Honolulu.

    J1: 3 Transports
    J2: Minor, Air, Naval FIC
    J3: (India Crush), 3 Mech + start building carriers to counter USA

    Maybe keep 1 battleship, 2 destroyer and 2 fighters in Japan to counter an early strike now Hawaiian fleet is alive and USA likely more aggressive.

    This reinforces the southern fleet with 2 full carriers, 1 cruiser and 1 submarine.

    Then 2 infantry from Siam can take FIC, making the attack on Yunnan stronger with 1 infantry, giving me at least a counter attack with most of my planes and 2 infantry + 1 mech on Yunnan J2. When Yunnan is not retaken, I do not need an airbare there in J2 and could build my #4 carrier in Japan.


  • Update on the game, which was the fastest and most convincing Axis win we had since playing Allies and Allies over last 6 years, Japan took Hawaii in J7 (India in J4).

    I could not resist the experience of doing a Pearl Harbour so decided go for a more conservative slow but steady approach for Japan as I indeed became convinced J3 India + Pearl Harbour can easily be stopped by Allied play. I did take Shan State with 1 infantry to leave the option open, but UK retook it in UK1.

    J1: 2 transports, 1 mic in shantung
    J2: 3 mech, 1 mic in kiangsu (FIC could be take by UK), 1 carrier
    J3: 1 naval base FIC, 2 carriers, 4 fighters
    J4 onwards: tanks/mechs 2 chinese MIC + carriers and air

    I did the all out J1 as I described in my plan of action. UK + ANZAC both very aggressive taking money islands, but I could therefore destroy their fleets in J2 and still take those islands. I send my transports to Caroline Islands J2 together with main fleet, pressuring ANZAC in defensive mode, with USA in pursuit. Then J3 I combined fleet at FIC (taking Malaya) and J4 I took India. All the time I had most of my air destroying China (Siberians in J2) and China was dead in J6.

    Germany and Italy also very succesful. UK made a mistake with not doing Taranto and building factory in Egypt, I took Trans-Jordan I1 and Egypt in I2. It had taked Egypt was 1 tank left, then I send 3 german bombers to help defend it. UK could attack with 1 tactical, 2 fighters and 1 infantry. 2 Bombers hit and secure Egypt for the Axis! German started to reinforce it with 2 inf and air the turns after to hold it against UK attacks.

    G1: 2 subs, 1 bomber
    G2: 8 tanks, 2 mech, bombers
    G3: 10 mech, bombers
    G4 onwards: some infantry, artillery and bombers

    Germany had a very miserable G1, most fleet attacks dying without succes. Also 110 was very painful, losing some air. I sticked to my plan of G3DOW, concentrated my troops and was able to take Moscow in G6 because of Russian defensive mindset in Ukraine + Leningrad, so I could bypass. In G7 I had stalingrad, moscow and egypt and would have take Leningrad in G8.

    Italy had 25 IPC throughout the game. Isolated in Egypt but in firm control.

    I was helped that both my allies played their nations for first time again since a long time, so had to figure out again how they worked. Also their teamwork could have been stronger, especially in pacific. I did make sure UK had no fleet throughout the game so it was difficult for USA to have can opening allies.

  • '21 '20 '18 '17

    Great job, merry Christmas.


  • @CWO-Marc said in Pearl Harbour Attack:

    @taamvan said in Pearl Harbour Attack:

    Love it. While chess isn’t my personal favorite, it is a model for wargaming. Its amazing that with such a limited set of starting options and pieces, that the game has a tremendous following and has, in all its variants, for centuries.

    Some people believe that the sides in chess are equal. This is a misconception; the players start with symmetrical forces, but the White player has + one more unit of initiative, and the Black player has + one more piece of information (what White did). This is a good analogy to our favorite game, and is the starting point for all “asymmetrical” wargames, where the players share common units types and resources, but are each different and unique.

    I once heard about a Russian chess grandmaster (I forget who, so I’ll call him So-and-So) who was asked whether he prefers to play the white or black pieces. He answered: “It makes no difference to me. When I play white, I win because I play first. When I play black, I win because I am So-and-So.”

    That was Efim Bogoljubov, father of the Bogo-Indian Defense. The quote definitely fit his temperament. :)


  • G1: 2 subs, 1 bomber
    G2: 8 tanks, 2 mech, bombers
    G3: 10 mech, bombers
    G4 onwards: some infantry, artillery and bombers (Western Front defence)

    Goal: Dark Skies, swarm the Med with Luftwaffe to help Italy, bring 20 fast movers to Russian front before G4 so they can be overpowered. Bomb Russian factories back to stone age.

    Most targeted unit: UK ships.

    J1: 2 transports, 1 mic in shantung
    J2: 3 mech, 1 mic in kiangsu (FIC could be take by UK), 1 carrier
    J3: 1 naval base FIC, 2 carriers, 4 fighters
    J4 onwards: tanks/mechs 2 chinese MIC + carriers and air

    Goal: Conquer China completely and keep it with 2 early factories and steady flow of reinforcements, then invade Russia to reinforce German push. Take the initiative by all out J1 incl. Pearl Harbour, splitting fleet in two groups, then go for either Sydney or India based on Allied play. Get money islands asap to get to same economic level as USA. Start pumping carriers from J2 onwards. Keep India and ANZAC as small as possible to isolate USA.

    Most targeted unit: Chinese Infantry.

    I1: tank and mech
    I2: tanks
    I3: transport, troops for Africa
    I4: mic in Egypt, troops for Africa

    Provide German with mechanized can opening army (first 2 buys), reinforcing the starting 2 mainland tanks. Survive in Africa while German airforce flies in to destroy the British, so they can start their offensive I2 or I3 when UK is weakened and can be defeated. After Germans gave them a kickstart in NO, focus on keeping Egypt and in best case scenario start pushing Middle East/Africa.

    Most targeted: weak spots in Russian defence.

    Overal Axis focus: Egypt and Yunnan, all other are less important.

Suggested Topics

  • 6
  • 3
  • 15
  • 16
  • 21
  • 9
  • 6
  • 23
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

30

Online

17.0k

Users

39.3k

Topics

1.7m

Posts