@barnee thank you! So Germany goes first…
Grasshopper's 8d System  Conversion tables for 1940 Global units

@SS:
@Young:
So you both want Artillery that Att and Def 3/8?
Yes
Yes.
There is more reasons this will make a more interesting game.
Such Artillery, I bet will improve the game.
Same as Cruiser A5 D5 will be more interesting purchase, so Artillery A3 D3 too. 
YG’s complete D8s roster
Here is the comparative with Enigma formula (still using a 12 IPCs unit reference) based on odds, not dice number.
144*Odds/cost^2 = strength of unit on same odds by hit per IPCs basis.I bolded the greatest number between D8 or D6 for same unit.
When there is no difference, I quoted it.
So, you can see at glance which is boosted or nerfed compared to OOB.Unit type Combat value (D8 system) (D6 OOB)
Infantry A12 D2 (2.00** / 4.00) (2.673.92 / 5.33)
Inf A2+Arty A2 D2 2.94** / 2.94 (3.92 / 3.92)
Inf A2+Arty A3 D2 3.67** / 2.94 Same as above
Inf A2+Arty A3 D3 3.67** / 3.67 Same as aboveMechInfantry A12 D2 (1.125** / 2.25) (1.503.00 / 3.00)
MechInf A2+Art A2 D2 (2.25** / 2.25) vs (3.00 / 3.00)
MechInf A2+Art A3 D2 (2.81** / 2.25) vs Same as above
MechInf A2+Art A3 D3 (2.81** / 2.81) vs Same as aboveArtillery A2 D2 (2.25 / 2.25) (3.00 / 3.00)
Artillery A3 D2 (3.375 / 2.25) avg: 2.813 Same as above
Artillery A3 D3 (3.375 / 3.375) Same as aboveTank A4 D4 (2.00 / 2.00) (2.00 / 2.00)
AntiAir A A0 D1* (0.00 / 0.72 per plane) (0.00 / 0.96 per plane)
Fighter A4 D5 (0.72 / 0.90 ) (0.72 / 0.96)
TcBomber A45 D4 (0.595** / 0.595) (0.595 / 0.595)
TcB A5+Tank C17 (1.12** / 1.00) (1.16 / 1.00)
TcB A5+Fighter C21 (0.735** / 0.653) (0.761 / 0.653)
StBomber A5 D1 (0.625 / 0.125) (0.667 / 0.167)
Submarine A2 D1 (1.00, fs: 1.50 / 0.50 fs: 0.67) (1.33, fs: 2.00 / 0.67 fs: 0.89)
Submarine A3 D1 (1.50, fs: 2.25 / 0.50 fs: 0.67) (1.33, fs: 2.00 / 0.67 fs: 0.89)
Submarine A3 D2 (1.50, fs: 2.25 / 1.00 fs: 1.33) (1.33, fs: 2.00 / 0.67 fs: 0.89)
Destroyer A2 D2 (0.563 / 0.563) (0.75 / 0.75)
Destroyer A2 D3 (0.563 / 0.844) avg: 0.704 (0.75 / 0.75)
Destroyer A3 D3 (0.844 / 0.844) (0.75 / 0.75)
Cruiser A5 D5 (0.625 / 0.625) (0.50 / 0.50)
Carrier, 2 hits A0 D2 (0.0 / 0.368) (0.00 / 0.491)
Carrier, 2 hits A0 D3 (0.0 / 0.552) As above
Battleship A6 D6 (0.707 / 0.707) (0.628 / 0.628) 
understand by putting the art attack @ 3 makes it the strongest unit on the board with regards to attack for the cost…
I think we all agree it should not have that status…
now at 2 is not right either…so…
my feeling is use combine arms for art…
besides inf and mechs getting boosted 1 attack…why not also boost art to 3 as well…
that would be a good compromise imo 
Unit Type Cst Mve Att Def CPHa CPHd
AA GUN 5 1 N/A 1 40.0
MCH INF 4 2 1 2 32.0 16.0
INF 3 1 1 2 24.0 12.0
ART 4 1 3 2 10.7 16.0
TANK 6 2 4 4 12.0 12.0
FIGHTER 10 4 4 5 20.0 16.0
TACT 11 4 4 4 22.0 22.0
STR BMB 12 6 5 1 19.2 96.0
TRANS 7 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A
SUB Â Â Â Â Â 6 2 3 2 16.0 24.0
DEST 8 2 3 3 21.3 21.3
CRUISER 12 2 5 5 19.2 19.2
AC 16 2 N/A 2 N/A 64.0
BSHIP 20 2 6 6 26.7 26.7see the art imo too powerful at 3 attack straight up, but a good way to get around this is again by doing the 2 attack stand alone and 3 when combined with either inf and/or mech

understand by putting the art attack @ 3 makes it the strongest unit on the board with regards to attack for the cost…
I think we all agree it should not have that status…
now at 2 is not right either…so…
my feeling is use combine arms for art…
besides inf and mechs getting boosted 1 attack…why not also boost art to 3 as well…
that would be a good compromise imoIn fact, OOB it was the case by itself or combined arms with Inf, and it should IMO.
Artillery was slow but best on offense.
Unit type Combat value (D8 system) (D6 OOB)
Infantry A12 D2 (2.003.67 / 4.00) (2.67**3.92** / 5.33)
Inf+Art A3 D3 3.67 / 3.67 (3.92 / 3.92)
MechInf A12 D2 (1.1252.81 / 2.25) (1.503.00 / 3.00)
Artillery A2 D2 (2.25 / 2.25) (3.00 / 3.00)
Artillery A3 D3 (3.375 / 3.375) Same as above
Tank A4 D4 (2.00 / 2.00) (2.00 / 2.00)I did not make the numbers for Art A2 D2 combined arms:
Infantry+Art A12 D2 (2.002.94 / 2.94) vs 3.92 / 2.94
MechInf+Art A12 D2 (1.1252.25 / 2.25) vs 1.503.00 / 2.25But it showed that A2 D2 is a big drop from 5.33 to 2.94 on defense.
I’m trying to keep the same type of combined arms than OOB.
I think it is easier for comparison to use odds in formula rather than absolute number which make only for comparison within the same dice system.
How do you get your 12.0 for Tank?

=if(and(E26 <> ÊºN/AÊº, C26 <> ÊºN/AÊº), (1/(E26/8))*C26, ÊºN/AÊº)
that’s the formula for the tank…
its right…we made the tank stronger…
pretty much all the navy units as well…
this way the term “obsolete” should be eliminated…
all units are worthwhile buying now in this system 
just look at the defense of the inf…
half the cost and defend at 2tank double the cost and defend at 4
both at 12 for cost to defend…
checks out

Unit Type Cst Mve Att Def CPHa CPHd
AA GUN 5 1 N/A 1 40.0
MCH INF 4 2 1 2 32.0 16.0
INF 3 1 1 2 24.0 12.0
ART 4 1 3 2 10.7 16.0
TANK 6 2 4 4 12.0 12.0
FIGHTER 10 4 4 5 20.0 16.0
TACT 11 4 4 4 22.0 22.0
STR BMB 12 6 5 1 19.2 96.0
TRANS 7 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A
SUB � � � � � 6 2 3 2 16.0 24.0
DEST 8 2 3 3 21.3 21.3
CRUISER 12 2 5 5 19.2 19.2
AC 16 2 N/A 2 N/A 64.0
BSHIP 20 2 6 6 26.7 26.7see the art imo too powerful at 3 attack straight up, but a good way to get around this is again by doing the 2 attack stand alone and 3 when combined with either inf and/or mech
If you show attack before defense, then there is a few discrepancies in your table.
Some numbers are probably not right, such as TcB compared to Fg. 
=if(and(E26 <> ʺN/Aʺ, C26 <> ʺN/Aʺ), (1/(E26/8))*C26, ʺN/Aʺ)
that’s the formula for the tank…
its right…we made the tank stronger…
pretty much all the navy units as well…
this way the term “obsolete” should be eliminated…
all units are worthwhile buying now in this systemExcept for Artillery A2 D2 (2.25) which will be almost like Tank (2.00).
The mobility would make Tank a better investment than a M1.
Artillery OOB was not that purchased even with a high combined arms factor for Infantry (3.92)
But, with a low 2.94 it will be still less interesting for offense. 
I think where it currently falls on the list provides the best interpretation of the Oob unit (Att 3/8  Def 2/8). its a much better unit in amphibious assaults, but still a very weak unit for long drives across land.

@Young:
I think where it currently falls on the list provides the best interpretation of the Oob unit (Att 3/8  Def 2/8). its a much better unit in amphibious assaults, but still a very weak unit for long drives across land.
Why don’t try it the other way?
Att 2/8  Def 3/8 +1A bonus to Inf or MI?It would make more sense that big guns be good for defensive stance while providing a boost to Inf and MI.
And moving them constantly forward during attack is less convenient.On amphibious assault, it does not seem right that Artillery is better than Tank from historical POV.
If the other way (Art A2 D3):
Inf A2 + Art A2 = A4
Inf A1 + Tank A4 = A5But, in pure number, from game POV, it seems to work almost as OOB TP (67% odds):
Inf A2 + Art A3 = A5 (62.5%)
Inf A1 + Tank A4 = A5
Anyway, I did my best to make the case for Artillery A3 D3 +1A to Inf or MI.

where are the marines need that to make arty awesome…

where are the marines need that to make arty awesome…

@Young:
Baron,
With the differences between my 8D units and VANNs 8D units… which do you like best? Please don’t give me a bunch of analytics and than play neutral, give me a straight opinion. Thanks.
@Dauvio:
The destroyer strength is lower then the cruiser, and the combo of the cruiser&battleship makes the cruiser, and battleship worth buying (not obsolete). Having a higher defense strength for the carrier composites the lower fighter defense strength.
OK, hear this YG.
If you really want to solve the issue about Cruiser and Battleship, I can see what was intended by Vann.It is SS that pushed me on this track.
In his heavily HR game, Destroyer and Cruiser are at 7 IPCs and 9 IPCs.
Even with this revised cost, he told me that Cruiser is not very popular.In fact, to create an interesting incentive, Destroyer has to be as Vann suggested @2 and not higher:
 Destroyer  attack 2  defense 2  move 2  Cost 8  AntiSubmarine Weapon  Strength: 0.563  OOB: 0.750 
 Destroyer  attack 3  defense 3  move 2  Cost 8  AntiSubmarine Weapon  Strength: 0.844!!! 
 Cruiser  attack 5  defense 5  move 2  Cost 12  Shore bombard @5  Strength: 0.625  OOB: 0.50 
 Battleship  attack 6  defense 6  move 2  Cost 20  Shore bombard @6 Hits 2  Strength: 0.707  OOB: 0.628 Otherwise, Cruiser A5 D5 (0.625) remains a suboptimal purchase compared to Destroyer A3 D3 (0.844) and 2 hits Battleship A6 D6 (0.707).
By keeping a slow increase in strength with higher cost unit, each warship will have a specific function:

Destroyer A2 D2 (0.563) at 8 IPCs will be cheap fodder and blocker and useful against Submarine.

Cruiser A5 D5 (0.625) at 12 IPCs will be a medium purchase but will provide a better firepower against enemy’s warships and aircraft while giving the best shore bombardment per cost (0.625) vs BB (0.27).

Battleship A6 D6 (0.707) at 20 IPCs will be the most expensive warship but, with a repair capacity, it is strongest of all too.
This keeps open what to do with Submarine.
However, a weaker A2 D2 Destroyer pushes the envelop in Vann’s direction: Submarine  attack 2  defense 1  move 2  Cost 6  Submarine’s capacities 
 Strength: 1.00 / 0.50  OOB: 1.33 / 0.667 
 Strength for surprise strike: 1.50 / 0.667  OOB: 2.00 / 0.89 Compared to:
 Submarine  attack 3  defense 2  move 2  Cost 6  Submarine’s capacities 
 Strength: 1.50 / 1.00  OOB: 1.33 / 0.67 
 Strength for surprise strike: 2.25 / 1.50  OOB: 2.00 / 0.89 @Baron:
YG’s complete D8s roster
Here is the comparative with Enigma formula (still using a 12 IPCs unit reference) based on odds, not dice number.
144*Odds/cost^2 = strength of unit on same odds by hit per IPCs basis.I bolded the greatest number between D8 or D6 for same unit.
When there is no difference, I quoted it.
So, you can see at glance which is boosted or nerfed compared to OOB.Unit type Combat value (D8 system) (D6 OOB)
Infantry A12 D2 (2.00** / 4.00) (2.673.92 / 5.33)
Inf A2+Arty A2 D2 2.94** / 2.94 (3.92 / 3.92)
Inf A2+Arty A3 D2 3.67** / 2.94 Same as above
Inf A2+Arty A3 D3 3.67** / 3.67 Same as aboveMechInfantry A12 D2 (1.125** / 2.25) (1.503.00 / 3.00)
MechInf A2+Art A2 D2 (2.25** / 2.25) vs (3.00 / 3.00)
MechInf A2+Art A3 D2 (2.81** / 2.25) vs Same as above
MechInf A2+Art A3 D3 (2.81** / 2.81) vs Same as aboveArtillery A2 D2 (2.25 / 2.25) (3.00 / 3.00)
Artillery A3 D2 (3.375 / 2.25) Same as above
Artillery A3 D3 (3.375 / 3.375) Same as aboveTank A4 D4 (2.00 / 2.00) (2.00 / 2.00)
AntiAir A A0 D1* (0.00 / 0.72 per plane) (0.00 / 0.96 per plane)
Fighter A4 D5 (0.72 / 0.90 ) (0.72 / 0.96)
TcBomber A45 D4 (0.595** / 0.595) (0.595 / 0.595)
TcB A5+Tank C17 (1.12** / 1.00) (1.16 / 1.00)
TcB A5+Fighter C21 (0.735** / 0.653) (0.761 / 0.653)
StBomber A5 D1 (0.625 / 0.125) (0.667 / 0.167)
Submarine A2 D1 (1.00, fs: 1.50 / 0.50 fs: 0.67) (1.33, fs: 2.00 / 0.67 fs: 0.89)
Submarine A3 D2 (1.50, fs: 2.25 / 1.00 fs: 1.33) (1.33, fs: 2.00 / 0.67 fs: 0.89)
Destroyer A2 D2 (0.563 / 0.563) (0.75 / 0.75)
Destroyer A3 D3 (0.844 / 0.844) (0.75 / 0.75)
Cruiser A5 D5 (0.625 / 0.625) (0.50 / 0.50)
Carrier, 2 hits A0 D2 (0.0 / 0.368) (0.00 / 0.491)
Carrier, 2 hits A0 D3 (0.0 / 0.552) As above
Battleship A6 D6 (0.707 / 0.707) (0.628 / 0.628) 

you and Vann are not looking at the cost per hit calculations.

Yes, cost per hit ratio is considered by the Enigma formula. It does not directly appear but it is.
A higher cost make for weaker hit/cost value.
That is considered when divided by squared cost.A 1 hit @1 per 3 IPCs is as strong as 1 hit @4 per 6 IPCs.
1/ (3^2) or 9 = 4 / (6^2) or 36
In both case, you get 0.111 which is in power*hit.Using odds instead of number: 16.7% / 9 = 66.7% / 36
You get : 1/54 or 0.0185 odds* hit@Baron:
@Dauvio:
It came to my attention that one of my formulas are already out there that I discovered 30 years ago.
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?action=profile;u=185969 has also discovered the formula P^2*N=S
And just for fun you can try these formulas also. S/P^2=N. √(S/N)=P
P=POINTS
N=NUMBER OF UNITS
S=STRENGTH OF ONE KIND OF UNITS IN A TERRITORY
This formula should replace the punch formula. It is much better then the punch formula.Now the next formula is (P100)/(C^26)=S
P=POINTS
C=COST
S=STRENGTH OF THE UNIT BASED ON COST
With this formula you can also price units according to their strength. √((P100)/(S6))=C
This formula is for points. (S*(C^2*6))/100=PFor better results for some of these formulas, have all your units cost ten times then what they are. These are some of the VANN FORMULAS I came up 30 years ago.
If you have any questions about these formulas, please ask.
I found how you can get the main part of Vann formula or BaronLarrymarx according to a specific unit as benchmark.
I took the Fighter A3 D4 C10 and I wanted to convert into Tank A3 D3 C6 as benchmark (BaronLarrymarx formula).
Then I saw what I did.
Power (of attacking Fighter): A3 * C6 (cost of Tank)/C10 (cost of Fg) * 1 Hit Point C6 (cost of Tank)/C10 (cost of Fg) = 1.08
You can reduce this equation because (cost of Tank)(cost of Tank)/ (cost of Fg)*(cost of Fg) is same to
(cost of Tank) IPCs^2 / (cost of Fg) IPCs^2 and give a simple ratio.C6^2*A3/C10^2 = 1.08
36 squared IPCs 3 Power * 1 Hit /100 squared IPCs = 1.08 PowerHit PointThis explained what is hidden in BaronLarrymarx formula:
Offence or defence strength factor= 36*Power/Cost^2.The whole Enigma formula is
Refence unit Cost^2Power of the actual unit1 HP/Cost of the actual unit^2So, the Basic offence or defence strength factor result (1.08, in this case) is express in Power*Hit Point
1^2*Power (of a given unit)*1 hit/Cost (of this same given unit)^2And this formula can be adapt according to any benchmark, for instance a 1 IPC unit:
131 hit/10^2 = 0.300And this is a very small number. That’s why Vann formula:
Strength= (Power100)/(Cost^26)add an arbitrary 1001/6= 16.667…
So, 16.667131 hit/10^2 = 0.5
And this would provide the Fighter strength attack factor based on an hypothetical benchmark unit of √16.667 = 4.0825 IPCs.
A 5 IPCs revised Tank in Vann formula gives a Strength : 16.66731 hit/5^2 = 2.00 powerhit 
@Young:
you and Vann are not looking at the cost per hit calculations.
Also, D8 system keeps the same as OOB D6 if looking directly to cost per hit:
Sub is 6 IPCs/hit
DD is 8 IPCs/hit
Cruiser 12 IPCs/hit
BB is 10 IPCs/hit 
@Baron:
@Young:
you and Vann are not looking at the cost per hit calculations.
Also, D8 system keeps the same as OOB D6 if looking directly to cost per hit:
Sub is 6 IPCs/hit
DD is 8 IPCs/hit
Cruiser 12 IPCs/hit
BB is 10 IPCs/hitBaron… why don’t you just show us what you believe the whole table should look like under the 8d system?.. use the following chart and fill in the blanks.
Attacking unit dice odds
1/8  White (12.5%)
2/8  Green (25%)
3/8  Blue (37.5%)
4/8  Purple (50%)
5/8  Red (62.5%)
6/8  Black (75%)
Defending unit dice odds
1/8  White (12.5%)
2/8  Green (25%)
3/8  Blue (37.5%)
4/8  Purple (50%)
5/8  Red (62.5%)
6/8  Black (75%)
Strategic bombing air combat values
1/8  White (12.5%)
2/8  Green (25%)
Kamikaze Token defense values


Mostly here:
Art, Sub, DD, Carrier, with debatable values are put side by side, followed by OOB comparison.If DD going down to A2 D2, then I would go Sub A2 D1 and keep Carrier D2.
Less changes from habit is another factor.
I made the case for Arty A3 D3, but A3 D2 or A2 D3 will be more gradual progress compared to Inf or MI.Numbers is one thing but there is other factors.
I miscalculated BB when Vann bring is own D8 units.
Looking deeper, I saw my mistake and could see what he was telling.
IMO, it is mostly wrapped up. Only Art and DD & Sub are unfinished business.@Baron:
YG’s complete D8s roster
Here is the comparative with Enigma formula (still using a 12 IPCs unit reference) based on odds, not dice number.
144*Odds/cost^2 = strength of unit on same odds by hit per IPCs basis.I bolded the greatest number between D8 or D6 for same unit.
When there is no difference, I quoted it.
So, you can see at glance which is boosted or nerfed compared to OOB.Unit type Combat value (D8 system) (D6 OOB)
Infantry A12 D2 (2.00** / 4.00) (2.673.92 / 5.33)
Inf A2+Arty A2 D2 2.94** / 2.94 (3.92 / 3.92)
Inf A2+Arty A3 D2 3.67** / 2.94 Same as above
Inf A2+Arty A3 D3 3.67** / 3.67 Same as aboveMechInfantry A12 D2 (1.125** / 2.25) (1.503.00 / 3.00)
MechInf A2+Art A2 D2 (2.25** / 2.25) vs (3.00 / 3.00)
MechInf A2+Art A3 D2 (2.81** / 2.25) vs Same as above
MechInf A2+Art A3 D3 (2.81** / 2.81) vs Same as aboveArtillery A2 D2 (2.25 / 2.25) (3.00 / 3.00)
Artillery A3 D2 (3.375 / 2.25) Same as above
Artillery A3 D3 (3.375 / 3.375) Same as aboveTank A4 D4 (2.00 / 2.00) (2.00 / 2.00)
AntiAir A A0 D1* (0.00 / 0.72 per plane) (0.00 / 0.96 per plane)
Fighter A4 D5 (0.72 / 0.90 ) (0.72 / 0.96)
TcBomber A45 D4 (0.595** / 0.595) (0.595 / 0.595)
TcB A5+Tank C17 (1.12** / 1.00) (1.16 / 1.00)
TcB A5+Fighter C21 (0.735** / 0.653) (0.761 / 0.653)
StBomber A5 D1 (0.625 / 0.125) (0.667 / 0.167)
Submarine A2 D1 (1.00, fs: 1.50 / 0.50 fs: 0.67) (1.33, fs: 2.00 / 0.67 fs: 0.89)
Submarine A3 D2 (1.50, fs: 2.25 / 1.00 fs: 1.33) (1.33, fs: 2.00 / 0.67 fs: 0.89)
Destroyer A2 D2 (0.563 / 0.563) (0.75 / 0.75)
Destroyer A3 D3 (0.844 / 0.844) (0.75 / 0.75)
Cruiser A5 D5 (0.625 / 0.625) (0.50 / 0.50)
Carrier, 2 hits A0 D2 (0.0 / 0.368) (0.00 / 0.491)
Carrier, 2 hits A0 D3 (0.0 / 0.552) As above
Battleship A6 D6 (0.707 / 0.707) (0.628 / 0.628) 
baron…the best we can do is art 3 attack and 2 defend…
the sub could go to 7 ipcs…that would soften strength with 3 attack and 2 defend…
same thing with destroyer going to 9 ipcs…that would soften strength with 3 attack and 3 defend…the whole idea here though is to NOT change ipc values and only attack and defend…the changes made for the most part balanced units so they would eliminate the so called “obsolete” notion…
namely the tank, cruiser, and battleship…
by weakening land units, planes, and strengthening ships the units on whole become more likely to be bought in a typical game in this 8 sided version of 2nd edition…
so, in other words we should try to not reinvent the wheel as much as possible so that more players will hopefully move towards this version… 
baron…the best we can do is art 3 attack and 2 defend…
the sub could go to 7 ipcs…that would soften strength with 3 attack and 2 defend…
same thing with destroyer going to 9 ipcs…that would soften strength with 3 attack and 3 defend…the whole idea here though is to NOT change ipc values and only attack and defend…the changes made for the most part balanced units so they would eliminate the so called “obsolete” notion…
namely the tank, cruiser, and battleship…
by weakening land units, planes, and strengthening ships the units on whole become more likely to be bought in a typical game in this 8 sided version of 2nd edition…
so, in other words we should try to not reinvent the wheel as much as possible so that more players will hopefully move towards this version…I agree with your second verse all bolded, except that Tank were a bit weak but not obsolete because of blitz and M2. Tank have is own niche OOB.
I don’t understand then what you are suggesting first part.
To be within YG’s parameters, we need to keep cost as OOB.
And it is clearly possible.I believe the game will be better with Arty A3 D3 M1 and DD A2 D2.
I also like this because Sub A2 D1, DD A2 D2 and Carrier A0 D2 would keep their same numbers as OOB.
And the strength increase from cheap DD to affordable Cruiser and costly BB makes for no “obsolete” warship.Artillery A3 D3 will be more purchase relatively to D8 Inf A1 D2, compared to G40 OOB (Art vs Inf).
But Inf is the best defense (4.00 even if weaker than OOB 5.33) compared to A3 D3 Arty (3.375)
Also, this Arty keeps similar equal number 3 offense and 3 defense.
And in combined arms will still be 4.1% weaker than OOB Inf+Art (3.67 vs 3.92) or MI+Arty (2.81 vs 3.00)
I know HBG make Artillery better defense than offense: like A2 D3 (A3 D4 on D12).
But, Infantry will still be best choice for cheap defense, fodder and useful for combined arms.
Artillery A3 D3 will not make Tank A4 D4 obsolete because of M2 Mobility and Blitz, and Tank is also better against Inf and MI in D8 system (compared to OOB).It requires a solid logistic strategy to bring this Artillery+Inf slow movers up to Moscow for the big battle.
MI and Tank still do the job much faster and the longer it takes for Germany, the more Russia can built up his defense. 
Here is my wish list :
@Young:
Attacking unit dice odds
1/8  White (12.5%)
Infantry (16.7%)
Mech Infantry (16.7%)2/8  Green (25%)
Infantry w/Artillery (33%)
Mech Infantry w/Artillery (33%)
Destroyer (33%)
Submarine (33%)3/8  Blue (37.5%)
Artillery (+33%)4/8  Purple (50%)
Tank (0%)
Fighter (0%)
Tactical Bomber (0%)5/8  Red (62.5%)
Strategic Bomber (66.7%)
Cruiser (+50%)
Tactical Bomber w/Fighter or w/Tank (66.7%)6/8  Black (75%)
Battleship (+66.7%)Defending unit dice odds
1/8  White (12.5%)
AA Guns (16.7%)
Strategic Bomber (16.7%)
Submarine (16.7%)2/8  Green (25%)
Infantry (33%)
Mech Infantry (33%)
Aircraft Carrier (33%)
Destroyer (33%)3/8  Blue (37.5%)
Artillery (+33%)4/8  Purple (50%)
Tank (0%)
Tactical Bomber (0%)5/8  Red (62.5%)
Fighter ( 66.7%)
Cruiser (+50%)6/8  Black (75%)
Battleship (+66.7%)Strategic bombing air combat values
1/8  White (12.5%)
Tac Bomber (16.7%)
Strategic Bomber (16.7)2/8  Green (25%)
Fighter interceptor (+16.7%)
Fighter escort (+16.7%)Kamikaze Token defense values
2/8  Green (25%)
Kamikaze Token (33%)*Special thanks to Big Al “Mike Tyson” for contributing in this idea & Baron Munchhausen for his calculations.

I kinda like this, but the costs need to be adjusted as well, especially naval

How can you adjust cost without coming back to Cruiser (warship) conundrum?
Assuming YG parameters is to not play with cost, I’m still curious about how you would solve the issue.