Spying broader than first reported…


  • Not just a few phone calls, but apparently massive volume of telecommunications data of many kinds…

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051225/ap_on_go_pr_wh/domestic_spying

    NEW YORK - The National Security Agency has conducted much broader surveillance of e-mails and phone calls — without court orders — than the Bush administration has acknowledged, The New York Times reported on its Web site.

    The NSA, with help from American telecommunications companies, obtained access to streams of domestic and international communications, said the Times in the report late Friday, citing unidentified current and former government officials.

    The story did not name the companies.

    Since the Times disclosed the domestic spying program last week,
    President Bush has stressed that his executive order allowing the eavesdropping was limited to people with known links to al-Qaida.

    But the Times said that NSA technicians have combed through large volumes of phone and Internet traffic in search of patterns that might lead to terrorists.

    The volume of information harvested from telecommunications data and voice networks, without court-approved warrants, is much larger than the White House has acknowledged, the paper said, quoting an unnamed official.

    The story quoted a former technology manager at a major telecommunications firm as saying that companies have been storing information on calling patterns since the Sept. 11 attacks, and giving it to the federal government. Neither the manager nor the company he worked for was identified.


  • One other story you might be interested in on wiretaps.

    Alito Defended Use of Domestic Wiretaps
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051224/ap_on_go_su_co/alito

    Interesting Excerpt:

    Alito’s analysis about the court and the need for an incremental legal strategy proved prescient. The case ultimately led to a 1985 ruling by the Supreme Court that the attorney general and other high level executive officials could be sued for violating people’s rights, in the name of national security, with such actions as domestic wiretaps.

    “The danger that high federal officials will disregard constitutional rights in their zeal to protect the national security is sufficiently real to counsel against affording such officials an absolute immunity,” the court held.

    Ummm…  Did Bush’s legal team even LOOK at the ruling in this case???

Suggested Topics

  • 21
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 16
  • 41
  • 16
  • 40
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

33

Online

17.0k

Users

39.3k

Topics

1.7m

Posts