• '21 '20 '18 '17

    You should be taking Iceland as a stepping stone for your American invasion with both Germany and Japan.


  • @taamvan:

    You should be taking Iceland as a stepping stone for your American invasion with both Germany and Japan.

    As depicted here in one of Frank Capra’s Why We Fight films:

    Capra Maps.jpg

  • '19 '17 '16

    But Iceland represents an awesome base for a US invasion of Norway. I’ve never thought of that before. If the Kreigsmarine attack they need to either abandon convoying SZ109 or divide their forces. The surrounding sea zone is reachable by strategic bombers but not land based fighters. I’ll have to try this move next time as allies.

    Perhaps this is the move the OP was thinking of blocking?

  • '19 '17 '16

    Regarding attacking Greenland, if you can get that far why not attack Quebec? Stops a turn of production from the facility there, presumably slowing down efforts to regain SZ109. Attacking Greenland only robs US of a landing field they don’t need, unless I’m missing something?


  • @simon33:

    Regarding attacking Greenland, if you can get that far why not attack Quebec? Stops a turn of production from the facility there, presumably slowing down efforts to regain SZ109. Attacking Greenland only robs US of a landing field they don’t need, unless I’m missing something?

    That was the plan, force the Allies to place some focus on otherwise “safe” territories. My U-boats controlled the Atlantic and I was using original units for this ploy.


  • @Shin:

    I like to take Iceland as Germany to deny UK Europe the original territories bonus.  But holding it is something of an impossible dream.

    I like to take Cypress for that same reason. Depending on the situation it could take the UK a couple turns to get it back. Might even cost them a transport or some fleet.


  • @WILD:

    @Shin:

    I like to take Iceland as Germany to deny UK Europe the original territories bonus.  But holding it is something of an impossible dream.

    I like to take Cypress for that same reason. Depending on the situation it could take the UK a couple turns to get it back. Might even cost them a transport or some fleet.

    I like it, the two games I have played Cypress hasn’t played any role.


  • @ABWorsham:

    @simon33:

    Regarding attacking Greenland, if you can get that far why not attack Quebec? Stops a turn of production from the facility there, presumably slowing down efforts to regain SZ109. Attacking Greenland only robs US of a landing field they don’t need, unless I’m missing something?

    That was the plan, force the Allies to place some focus on otherwise “safe” territories. My U-boats controlled the Atlantic and I was using original units for this ploy.

    The problem there is that they are “safe” territories because they are easy to defend. Attacking your opponent’s strong points in preference to attacking weak points is generally not a sound strategy.

  • '19 '17 '16

    How about Scotland as an unsinkable aircraft carrier for the Axis? At least it’s two turns away from the US Navy’s production. With Strategic bombing on London it’s difficult for the UK to produce too many units there.

    I guess once you’re able to consolidate in Scotland, London is in a lot of danger anyway.


  • YES! Liberate Scotland from the English jackboot.Re-enforce with Italian fighters,build MIC and march down the M1 to London town.

Suggested Topics

  • 12
  • 1
  • 7
  • 3
  • 6
  • 8
  • 7
  • 29
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

41

Online

17.0k

Users

39.3k

Topics

1.7m

Posts