The North African Dominance (NAD) strat is FAR superior to the Brazil IC strat for keeping Africa in Allied hands.
It requires fewer transports, achieves the same purpose in allowing for Allied landings south of Sahara, and does so with far fewer IPC’s committed by the Allies. It also maintains an Allied shift-threat to northern Europe, AND an Allied threat to Southern Europe that the Brazil IC does not accomplish.
But hey, if you want to waste the cash, feel free.
Yea, but you taught me very well how to bottle up the North African Dominance strategy with very little effort and resources with Germany.
Sorry to say it, but NAD is not superior, it’s inferior against a veteran player. Too easy for Germany/Japan to dump in Egypt and now Germany is +9 IPC and England/America is +2 IPC (Algeria, Libya) for a net +7 to the Axis.
However, if moving from Brazil/S. Africa, the reverse is true. Germany/Japan may have Egypt, Libya and Algeria but that’s only 4 IPC while England has the rest +7 IPC.
Just the way I see it, though.