Russia's "National Prestige" objective


  • @ShadowHAwk:

    Well the islands in the med are also part of continental europe so that does not really rule them out.
    Sugest naming it countries with a IPC value of 1 or more.

    Also there are no pro allied neutrals in the zones you give so better dont put the line there only causes confusion.
    Strickt neutrals should not be touched really, it gives the allies even bigger incentive to attack the true neutrals, true it is more hystorical correct,
    if russia is strong in scandinavia then us can just attack a true neutral and give russia a +5 bonus for the rest of the game ( sweden + NO ), no need to weaken sea lion even further.

    Um, the “continental” part should exclude islands already, right? It doesn’t just mean “Europe-British Isles.”


  • @ShadowHAwk:

    Well the islands in the med are also part of continental europe so that does not really rule them out.
    Sugest naming it countries with a IPC value of 1 or more.

    Also there are no pro allied neutrals in the zones you give so better dont put the line there only causes confusion.
    Strickt neutrals should not be touched really, it gives the allies even bigger incentive to attack the true neutrals, true it is more hystorical correct,
    if russia is strong in scandinavia then us can just attack a true neutral and give russia a +5 bonus for the rest of the game ( sweden + NO ), no need to weaken sea lion even further.

    The islands aren’t part of continental Europe. By definition, no island is part of continental Europe.

    There are pro-allied neutrals in that zone: Yugoslavia and Greece.

    Russia can’t invade Sweden for a +5 bonus unless Germany already invaded it. Germany just has to leave Sweden alone to deny Russia the bonus.

  • '17 '16 '15 '14 '12

    This thread somehow switch from discussing “National Prestige” to the “Spread of Communism”.  Anyway how about this one:

    Red Spread:
    3 IPCs for each original German, Italian, or pro-Axis neutral territory that the Soviet Union controls, and for each of Novgorod, Volgograd, and Moscow while at war.

  • Liaison TripleA '11 '10

    I like that, basically one infantry per turn, for each city it controls!

  • Moderator 2022 2021 '20 '19 '18 '17 '16 '15 '14 '13 '12

    Nice Variance. You have eliminated the African territories and the Islands owned by Italy in one swoop. I like it. Adding 6 IPCs (Leningrad won’t stay Roussian for long) should help Russia too. That is what we are all craving.
    Of course a better way would be to give Russia an Inf unit in those VP cities, rather than 3 IPCs that can be bombed away, but I realise that would be too much of a jump.

  • '17 '16 '15 '14 '12

    OK I am going to give that one its own thread in house rules so it doesn’t get lost and forgotten.  Simple fix to a few issues.  Sorry I didn’t mean to hijack this thread, but it seemed to have already switched topic from the Murmansk NO

    http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=35771.0
    I also added the phrase “on the Europe map” so Russia can’t get the NO for its cities by declaring war on Japan.

    OK please go back to Murmansk

Suggested Topics

  • 7
  • 3
  • 2
  • 46
  • 1
  • 12
  • 42
  • 6
I Will Never Grow Up Games
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures
Dean's Army Guys

29
Online

16.2k
Users

37.9k
Topics

1.6m
Posts