<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Bridging]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The A&amp;A Classic from the 80,s had a great house rule named Bridging. It had in my basement, for sure.</p>
<p dir="auto">Lets say you have a tranny in sz 110 that was not used in combat nor has it moved. Then it can bridge 4 land units from UK to Normandy during non-combat.</p>
<p dir="auto">The rationale is that a tranny have 4 action points. 1 embark +1 move +1 move + 1 debark = 4 points.<br />
Now if that tranny is used for non-combat  bridging in sz 110, it will be 1 embark +1 debark + 1 embark + 1 debark = 4 points.<br />
So far so fair.</p>
<p dir="auto">With OOB rules, a tranny can 1&gt;embark in EUS 2&gt;sz 102 3&gt;sz 103 4&gt; sz 91 and 5&gt;debark in Morocco = 5 action points<br />
With OOB rules, a tranny in sz 110 is only allowed to 1&gt;embark in UK and 2&gt; debark in Normandy = 2 action points.</p>
<p dir="auto">This is not fair. It takes 14 days and a lot of fuel to cross the Atlantic, but only 4 hours to cross the Channel.</p>
<p dir="auto">My question is, should non-combat bridging need a Port ?<br />
Both UK and Normandy have ports, and Germany bridging from WG to Norway is ok, but what about bridging units from Norway to WG, should it be allowed ?</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/23242/bridging</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 03:01:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/23242.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 10:57:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>