agreed. the reds would win on land, the allies in the air…
88mm vs 25lb
ABWorsham4 last edited by
Which gun, of these awesome pieces, do you favor?
88 every time. I think it was the most versatile gun of the war. It was a great tank killer. (Germany’s only one in France.)
Not aware the 25lb was used in the AT role. The British had the adequate 6lb, until the 17lb was available.
I don’t know much about the 25-pounder, but as regards the famed German 88: it was excellent in both its original role as an anti-aircraft weapon and in its later additional role as an anti-tank gun, but I’m not sure how well it would work as “traditional artillery”. Anti-tank guns and anti-aircraft guns are both intended to work as direct-fire weapons, which basically means shooting in a straight line at a target you can see (at virtually no elevation for an anti-tank gun and at a very high elevation for an anti-aircraft gun). The 88’s high muzzle velocity was well suited to both jobs. Field artillery and divisional heavy artillery, on the other hand, are often called upon to deliver indirect fire: plunging fire against targets which can’t be seen (a classic example being WWI artillery barrages). This requires lower muzzle velocity and different sighting mechanisms than the 88 had.