With all the talk about BCS, I wonder why there is need for one.
Also, the game last night was great. 8-)
There wasn’t a need for it. In Div 1 college football the champ has always been ‘mythical.’ The result of a vote. No. 1 rarely played No. 2 in the Rose Bowl or Orange Bowl although No. 1 might be playing in the Rose Bowl and No. 2 in the Orange Bowl.
I don’t have much preference either way, but I find it a ridiculous topic to spend so much time on. People will complain about the system no matter what. Look at the NFL this year and complaints about a team with a better record not making it to the playoffs compared to another team with a crappy record in a really weak division.
I know, they knocked my 13-3 Cowboys out of the playoffs! :oops:
And thats all I will speak of the Dallas Cowboys, I’m still in shock about this year.
Coming from another long time (casual) Cowboy fan, I’m not in shock that Romo choked once again when it counted. And yes, I put the majority of the blame on him. Had the offense been good, the minor problems the defense had would not have been so painful.
So for you guys Champion is ‘playing best at the end of the season’?
I think that would make sense. A team playing well throughout the season will get honors and benefits (home field advantage, first round bye, etc.) that should assist them/reward in the post season. I know it’s more pronounced in the NFL, but it does exist to a degree in college.
But really, the season has to end at some point, and you couldn’t crown a champ midway or even before the last game.