What would you do if you had six A-bombs?

If it makes you feel any  better rjpeters, I would use all 6 within seconds of each other. All on Russia. All on industrial centres, or cities, like Moscow, as soon as I could.
I do not think much of keeping reserves. All in!
Of course I would be Germany.

If I were the British, I’d be tempted to expend all six bombs on the six most important oil-producing facilities that provided Germany with fuel.  Most likely this would mean the six biggest refineries in Romania, Germany’s main provider of oil.  If enough of these facilities were located in Ploiesti, I’d make that my main target.  The British supposedly calculated in 1941 that the elimination of about 8 or 9 important “oil targets”, out of a list 17 such targets which had been identified, would reduce Axis oil production capacity by 80%.  Six atomic bombs would take care of a majority of those 8 to 9 targets, so this would have translated into a production capacity drop of roughly 60%.  Having a lot less oil means being able to operate a lot fewer tanks and planes and U-boats.

Germany would have used two for England (Liverpool and London)and two for the Soviet Union (Leningrad and Moscow).
After the dropping on England ,the U.K. would immeditaley stop any War effort. And depending on wether the A-bomb killed Stalin or not, Germany would still push forward, disregarding any capitulation of the Soviets.
America would have been closlely watched and depending on their reaction, Germany would start negotiations with the U.S. .

The war is only over, if the enemy believes you still have LOTS of these bombs.

If I were Germany I would use these Weapons to wipe out a beach head. No Atlantic wall instead an “Atomic Wall”.

@rjpeters70:

But remember, the bombs are small ones, only 10-15 Kt.  They wouldn’t cause that much destruction.  London, St. Petersburg, Moscow, etc., would still be very functional cities after they were used.  The wars would not be over at all.

What makes you think that the war wouldn’t be over after the drop of a 15kT bomb?
You most likley have no chance but to end the war.
If your people dying like that you will be finding your self with your back on the wall. You are not a monster and willing to give in.
It is not only the ability to kill so many people at once but also the the way to deliever this kind of death.
In WW II. the saying was: it doesn’t matter death anymore, just the way it will happen.
With the drop of those bombs, Amerika not only implemented  sovereignty and independency to the world ,but also create a lot of enemys who smiling in her face and just waiting for big shot!

If it were late in the war and I were on the winning side, I might use them as they actually were used, to force the enemy into capitulation and avoid many more victims on my side.
If it were late in the war and I were on the losing, I might target large enemy troop concentrations to try and convince them that my new wonder weapon might yet turn the tide of war against them, and maybe negotiate some sort of peace settlement that would be better than unconditional surrender.

But if it were early in the war, I would hand them to my scientists and engineers and say to them: “Don’t ask me how I got these. But I want more of them, and bigger ones. Funding is not a problem. Now get to work.”

@Herr:

But if it were early in the war, I would hand them to my scientists and engineers and say to them: “Don’t ask me how I got these. But I want more of them, and bigger ones. Funding is not a problem. Now get to work.”

Reverse engineering is practical for some forms of technology – the Soviets produced the Tupolev Tu-4 by reverse-engineering the Boeing B-29 – but there’s a catch to doing the same thing with nuclear weapons.  It would be relatively feasible to copy the mechanical components of a WWII-era atomic bomb, but the tough part would be to manufacture the required quantities of fissionable-grade uranium 235 or plutonium (without which the copied bomb would simply be a very expensive paperweight).  Analyzing the core of an A-bomb would quickly reveal what it was made of, but this wouldn’t say anything about how the fissionable material was derived from non-fissionable U-238 – for instance by building massive gaseous diffusion plants of the type used by the Mahattan Project.

Good point. But I’d say it would be a distinct advantage to know what to aim for, and that promoting a concerted effort at an early date could have delivered the bomb maybe in 1943. The original premise of having bombs without an indication of their origin makes it all a rather theoretical exercise anyway, but I’d be hesitant to use them knowing I’d run out of them.

@rjpeters70:

Aequitas, as far as yields go, 15 kt is on the really, really low end.  It’s not going to vaporize a city made of steel and concrete and masonry.  It would wipe out a large neighborhood that size, and cause structural damage to buildings outside the initial blast zone, but we’re not talking megatons here.  We’re talking a handful of kilotons.  That’s not something that destroys a city.

I’m aware of that and still think that these would have been the targets for Germany.

@rjpeters70:

And:  “With the drop of those bombs, Amerika not only implemented  sovereignty and independency to the world ,but also create a lot of enemys who smiling in her face and just waiting for big shot!” So, you think Japan, America’s closest Asian ally, is just biding it’s time for revenge against the United States?  You honestly think that?

Is it impossible ?

@Herr:

Good point. But I’d say it would be a distinct advantage to know what to aim for

Which is how the Soviets were able to build them so quickly with a fraction of the resources available to the United States…

The date doesn’t matter.  I would use my 6 A-bombs to destroy the international financial system that is the root of all evil in the world today.  New York, Chicago, London, Geneva, Tokyo, Beijing.  Simultaneous detonations near the financial districts of those cities, no warning, maximum casualties, then I’d release my biological weapons (surprise I got those too :evil:).

If I were Germany early in the war, say in 1942 then I use them to destroy Moscow, Leningrad and Stalingrad…if Russia is still fighting after that, use them against the remaining industrial cities in the East (Chelyabinsk, Magnitogorsk, etc.).  In either case, the point is to decisively win in the East (where the vast majority of the German war effort was focused…).  In 1943 or 1944 (after the tide of the war has turned) use them tactically such at the battle of Kursk to increase my defensive capacity, the idea being to bleed the Russians into capitulation.  In 1945, the war is lost so hit London, Moscow, Leningrad, Stalingrad, New York and Washington DC (via submarine) to try to bluff a negotiated peace.

If Russia, then Berlin and tactical use on the east front.

If Japan, then the American West coast cities (Los Angeles, Seattle, San Francisco) the Panama Canal, Pearl Harbor, and probably Sidney, Australia.  For them, the war was against the USA and UK.

If the USA, then I would pretty much do what they did, unless I had the A-bomb earlier in the war in which case I would bomb the larger cities of Japan and Germany (Tokyo, Osaka, Berlin, etc.) instead of Hiroshima and tiny Nagasaki.

If Great Britain, I absolutely use them to destroy the U-boat pens and would probably bomb the larger cities and industrial areas of Germany with the remaining bombs.

Good post 221 Baker Street!

I like that you remembered the Russian Industrial places and that you considered them as well.

Aequiteas,

Yes, it goes unappreciated by most but the Russian industrial cities east of the Urals were extremely important to the Russians.  If I, as Germany, had only one A-bomb, I might destroy Magnitogorsk (or as much as 15 kT will) instead of any other target (perhaps including even Moscow).  Most of the Russian steel was produced in this relatively small city…without which there would be very few Russian tanks…without which, I don’t see how the Russians win the war.

I would use Sarin gas in Northern Syria.

I mean… wait. Wrong conversation. ;)

How would every nation delivered these bombs?
Suggestions ?

So isn’t that a possibility??

Yeah it’s a possibility, so long as the rocket doesn’t veer off course, or explode on the deck like this.

The Germans worked allready on guided missles like the V-1 and V-2.
Launching via Subs it would have meant that two Subs would have been needed to fire a V-1 or V-2,
while the first Sub was firing the V-1, the second sub would have guided it via Radio.
Since the German Navy ran allready successful tests with the new XXI boats as beeing a true SUBMARINE (U-Boat) it would have been an easy one to sneak up to any coast in the world.
Working allready on Rocket launchers for subs and test to fire a V-1 by a sub would have been the next level to the end of 1945.