Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you may not be able to execute some actions.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Hasbro/WotC Priorites (Not 1914)

Imperious Leader 2017 '16 '15 Organizer '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10 last edited by

You can buy your lazer gun trains for the WW1 game.
Reply Quote 0
1 Reply Last reply
Flashman Customizer last edited by

Where? Which page?
Reply Quote 0
1 Reply Last reply
Imperious Leader 2017 '16 '15 Organizer '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10 last edited by

Check out train sets. They are on more than a few pages.
Reply Quote 0
1 Reply Last reply
Flashman Customizer last edited by

You better get over to Larry’s site quick - spam attack!

Doesn’t look like we’ll ever get to find out what the UK does.
Reply Quote 0
1 Reply Last reply
Flashman Customizer last edited by

The only trains I can find are some horrible wooden outlines.
Reply Quote 0
1 Reply Last reply
Imperious Leader 2017 '16 '15 Organizer '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10 last edited by

Thats them. just add Lazers and roundels.
Reply Quote 0
1 Reply Last reply

31
Posts

3482
Views

2 / 2

20th Anniversary Give Away

In January 2000 this site came to life and now we're celebrating our 20th Anniversary with a prize giveaway of 30+ prizes. See this link for the list of prizes and winners.

T-shirts, Hats, and More

Suggested Topics

Unit Lineup speculation/wish list
Axis & Allies 1914 • • oztea

89

0
Votes

89
Posts

8565
Views

No Dreadnoughts should ever be built in the game since it takes 3+ years from start to finish. I understand it makes the game unplayable, but accuracy and not fun must be part of the game. Extrapolating this further all other naval units take 6-8 turns to build. I understand this means that half the game will have empty oceans, but oh well. Accuracy and not fun is whats important. Limits on how many of one type of unit get built would also presumably be part of Larry’s rules. If one thing we know is Axis and Allies is a perfect representation of Historical accuracy, and not fun anymore. Enjoy the game.
1914 Territories
Axis & Allies 1914 • • Feddy the Frog

4

0
Votes

4
Posts

1336
Views

In my experience the game is only playable by replacing ALL land and air units with chips bar the single infantry atop each stack. Even then it can still get crowded with units of 4 or 5 nations sometimes piling into a small tt. So for me a future version needs a few more infantry each and drop all the other land unit minis; and a big pile of extra chips, a different colour for each unit type. More likely a second edition will feature something along the lines of task force cards & markers; AH is not going to admit to the redundancy of plastic minis. Blow up boxes are a no-no.
B

Naval/Air Bases
Axis & Allies 1914 • • BJCard

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

893
Views

W

It appears there will be Naval Bases pre-printed on the board, allowing powers to place naval units and denoting which sea zones are mined, but so far that seems to be all they do.
Using 1914 pieces in 1940
Axis & Allies 1914 • • oztea

12

0
Votes

12
Posts

6045
Views

Would be neat to see the Chinese communists represented, they should have special guerrilla abilities (may be placed in an occupied territory, attacks on a 3 for the first round). They should also get an IPC bonus (maybe 3-4) if nearby Russia maintains nearby territories. Goes without saying they can’t occupy the same territories as Nationalist units. Canada is definitely a no-brainer, I would let them start with what’s on the board and just add a destroyer at SZ1, and they get a 5 IPC bonus if they control all their original territories plus Newfoundland/Labrador.
Scorched Earth/IPC Degradation
Axis & Allies 1914 • • ossel

4

0
Votes

4
Posts

1038
Views

There are many reasons for the failure of the Spring Offensive the nutritional status of the German Army, the Deciphering of German radio traffic by Georges Painvin, 1 mio CP Soldiers still hanging out in the East, but the main reason were the Strategic errors of the German leadership. Ludendorffs decision to reinforce troops who encountered the stubborn resistance led to an improper use of the powers. The findings of the subsequent World War showed that to maximize the shock effect precisely those troops should be increased, which had already achieved the greatest success. Generally, the reserve management during the offensive was problematic, since only the troops in the front line were reinforced and that no full new units were brought there. This led to rapid fatigue of the deployed forces. Furthermore, the fixation of the General Staff only on the military concept of the breakthrough. The offensive had been planned by the OHL consistently methodically, but only up to the supposedly decisive goal, the shock through the enemy lines. An orderly plan for the exploitation of the resulting gaps, something like an (donÂ´t know whats it in english) “UmfassungsmanÃ¶ver” was not hit. The shock of the attack had been identified as shock troops tactically decisive factor, however, to use this principle as a strategic moment, was not considered. Hey Flash, will you also simulate the Christmas Peace of 1914 ? Maybe with a little football on the map ?
H

1914 Map grievances
Axis & Allies 1914 • • Hunter Jones

13

1
Votes

13
Posts

2512
Views

C

@Patchman123 I think that the szs should be either ankara, sevastopol+rum and constantinople+bulg Constantinople+Ankara+bulgaria, Sevastopol+romania (this way i think it is in oob) The one for bulgaria+romania is unnecessary. Ottoman fleet, while exposed should be able to protect either Constantinople and Ankara at the same time or separately.
S

1914 Task force cards are ready
Axis & Allies 1914 • • Sir_Cala

3

0
Votes

3
Posts

1254
Views

S

Thanks again
Minor Powers in A&A 1914
Axis & Allies 1914 • • ch0senfktard

67

0
Votes

67
Posts

7714
Views

V

@Flashman: Germany did a lot of trade with adjacent neutrals, especially the Netherlands and Sweden, so maybe Germany gets a certain ammount of IPCs from these without having to invade.Â That will be interesting. It seems like a Norway-Denmark NO-type rule would be good, except supposedly the game was said not to be complex enough for NO’s. Maybe to avoid confusion one of the German seaside territories will have a larger than expected income. I’m not sure if the Unrestricted Submarine Warfare phase will be for more than just Germany, but if it were, then the allies could take out the “convoy” between Scandinavia and Germany.