Frist off, I am glad it was just my missunderstanding. Second I was making a suggestion with the idea of a British fleet off of SA to help the US (answering a question there).
Now I have been disscussing this Idea with other people and I think you guys would be the right group of people to end this dispute. Two people I know have this dispute:
Person 1: They think that the UK should build an IC in south Africa to start cranking out tanks to take back Africa. Then in GB build an Aircraft Carrier and several transports (to give GB a total of 3-5 transports in GB). After that build nothing but tanks, placing two in SA a turn and the rest in GB. Of course each turn you take the tanks bought in GB and transporting them to the Russian front for defense. This is all assuming that Russia took out the sub and transport in Germany and GB or US destroyed the German navy off the coast of SE. His Idea was to eventually send transports down to SE so GB could assault SE with tanks.
Person 2: They think that GB should leave Africa to the US and build a group of transports in GB (again assuming Germany has no navy left) and the usual naval requirements (AC pretty much) then storm WE and pump all of its resources into supporting that foothold allowing Russia some breathing room and then making a push for Germany.
Which one has the better Idea? Or are they both bad?