@Alsch91:
@shadowguidex:
No way, because you’re taking out Japanese INF. The more INF you kill the better - make them earn every single square inch of land because each battle whittles away from of their INF. Two FTR and two INF make for a nasty island to capture, and if you have a blocking ship there to ruin bombardments, all the better. It’s a LONG way from Japan to anywhere, especially when you gotta guard those TRN the whole way - and getting the TRN back to Japan is even worse.
As long as one infantry survives that battle, it’s definitely a losing proposition for you. I’ve still taken it, and you’ve lost your fighters. India needs its fighters, and Australia gets a whole lot of utility out of them too - like covering the American fleet in newly taken islands, for example. Now you don’t get that. This is great for Japan. I really don’t care that some of my infantry died. They’re supposed to. As long as the Japanese flag is on that island, however many died is fairly irrelevant. I’ll just evacuate and take some other island next turn. Infantry aren’t that hard to get from Japan really. 1 DD between Japan and Hawaii means that I don’t need to protect them in SZ 6.
I also completely agree with Alsch91.
UK planes are the most precious units for India, and those units can never be replaced with proper Japan play. Spending 2 of them to “protect” an island usually makes no sense.
@shadowguidex:
I follow your comments very closely and your opinions are always so skewed towards an outcome you desire…
Well, so do i with your comments Shadowguidex, and i have to say that what you say of Jennifer is sometimes true with your own comments … Often you’re writing with the same degree of certainty you would have if you were THE A&A. Oracle…
Let me just give you an example from one of your last posts :
@shadowguidex:
Once the Japanese player begins to build minor IC everywhere, you know he is beaten because he’ll undoubtedly make the error of building tanks, but that’s a fools errand and will lead to nothing.
At first sight, that might appear a “cute” statement…But when you think of it seriously, you have to conclude that while it is true in a lot of positions, is is also completely false in a lot of other positions…
I don’t know, maybe you should spend less time tracking down Jennifer’s inacuracies and spend more time thinking about yours…