@jim010 said in jim010 Axis vs GovZ Allies +23 AAE OOB:
@GovZ - any scrambles? I assume at least 1
Scramble 3 to 110. Kill the boats first.
No Scramble to 111. Keep the DD alive as long as you still have subs.
Japan 9
Spend 63
tra - 7
3 arm, 2 inf - 21
3 sub - 18
2 des - 16
Combat
YUN 2 arm > BUR (2 art, arm, aa)
HUP arm > BUR
Z50 2 fig > BUR
Z50 3 fig > Z49 (des)
Z50 3 fig > Z48 (des)
BUR
aa
Rolls: 2@1; Total Hits: 12@1: (1, 6)
BUR
Rolls: 4@3; Total Hits: 34@3: (3, 3, 4, 2)
Rolls: 2@1 1@3; Total Hits: 22@1: (1, 1)1@3: (4)
Z49
Rolls: 3@3; Total Hits: 23@3: (1, 6, 3)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
Z48
Rolls: 3@3; Total Hits: 23@3: (2, 4, 1)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)
Last round I get zero hits.
This round you hit 3 fighters!
Z48 cleared, loss fig
Z49 cleared, loss fig
BURĀ taken, loss 2 arm, fig
NCM
BUR fig > YUN
Z48 2 fig > Z50
Z49 2 fig > Z50
Z62 fleet > Z50
CHI 2 inf > NIN
MAN 3 arm > HUP
Placement
MAN 3 arm
JPN 2 inf
Z62 - tra, 3 sub, 2 des
Income 54
UK 9
Has $22
Purchases
6 inf, 1 art
Combat Moves
NWE
1 inf England
Pol
1 inf England
Italy (1 bom)
1 bom England
E Ukr
1 inf Belo
2 ftr Moscow
Combat
Italy
aa fire
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (2)
Italy
A:
Rolls: 10@4; Total Hits: 810@4: (5, 3, 2, 6, 4, 3, 1, 1, 4, 1)
D:
Rolls: 10@1; Total Hits: 110@1: (4, 1, 4, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 6)
both bombers downed
E Ukr
A:
Rolls: 1@1 2@3; Total Hits: 11@1: (2)2@3: (2, 5)
D:
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
E Ukr taken with 1 inf + 2 ftrs
NonCom
1 inf Kar > Bst
1 inf kar > Belo
3 art, 7 inf Arch > Moscow
2 ftrs E Ukr > Moscow
2 inf Kar > Arch
3 inf, 1 art England > Kar
art Persia > India
Mobilization
4 inf Sum
1 art, 2 inf England
Collect $34
Has $34
Italy 9
Spend 13
3 inf, art
Combat
GER 2 inf > POL (inf)
UKR fig > (POL)
UKR 2 arm > KAZ (2 inf)
UKR 2 inf, 3 arm > EUK (inf)
FRA 2 inf > NWE (inf)
POL
Rolls: 2@1 1@3; Total Hits: 02@1: (3, 6)1@3: (4)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
POL 2
Rolls: 2@1 1@3; Total Hits: 12@1: (3, 1)1@3: (6)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
NWE
Rolls: 2@1; Total Hits: 02@1: (3, 3)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
NWE 2
Rolls: 2@1; Total Hits: 02@1: (2, 4)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
NWE retreat, loss inf
EUK
Rolls: 2@1 3@3; Total Hits: 32@1: (2, 1)3@3: (3, 2, 6)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
KAZ
Rolls: 2@3; Total Hits: 12@3: (1, 6)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (4, 2)
KAZ first to hit
Rolls: 10@3; Total Hits: 310@3: (2, 6, 1, 6, 5, 1, 5, 4, 4, 6)
Rolls: 10@2; Total Hits: 410@2: (6, 4, 2, 1, 6, 4, 1, 3, 1, 6)
KAZ - taken, loss arm
NWE - loss inf, retreat
POL taken, loss inf
EUK twol
NCM
POL fig > EUK
Placement
ITA 3 inf, art
Income 14
US 9
Has $49
Purchases
6 dd
Save $1
Combat Moves
Aus, end z47
2 art Sum
5 ftrs z38
Combat
A:
Rolls: 2@2 5@3; Total Hits: 32@2: (1, 4)5@3: (4, 6, 5, 1, 3)
D:
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
Aus taken wol
NonCom
3 ftrs Aus > z47
2 ftrs Aus > Sum
3 ftrs Sol Is > Sum
5 ftrs W US > z47
3 subs z45 > z47
8 subs z39 > z47
2 ftrs Moscow > India
fleet z38 > z47
sub z35 > z31
Mobilization
6 dd z56
Collect $49+1
Has $50
Do you think going heavy subs is better for the US early on when you are on the offensive, and then go more destroyers when youāre defending?
I havenāt figured out the best ratio for balancing the twoā¦Ā (and also how many cvs and fighters to buy).
Germany 10
Spend 53
4 art - 12
7 arm - 35
2 inf - 6
Combat
FRA 2 inf > NWE (inf)
EPL bom > NWE
EPL 2 inf, 3 fig > BEL (inf)
NWE
Rolls: 2@1 1@4; Total Hits: 12@1: (6, 3)1@4: (4)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)