Neutral USA/USSR unit share territory with others?

@Caesar-Seriona said in Dutch Neutrality Question: Because the creators thought it was enough to put their colonies in but not count it as an independent faction hence why you can’t liberate their homeland because it’s marked as German Grey and how it lacks units, income, and turn. So they make it under this stupid exile in govern status. Sorry, I don’t get that in the context of an argumentation for your previous statement: @Caesar-Seriona said in Dutch Neutrality Question: The game actually treats Japan already at war with the Dutch on turn 0. As clearly stated by the rules Japan starts the game being at war with China only. There is no state of war between Japan and the Netherlands. In order to attack Dutch colonies Japan needs to establish a state of war with UK/ANZAC instead. Rulebook Pacific 1940.2, page 37: Japan may attack Dutch territories only if a state of war exists between it and the United Kingdom and ANZAC.

@otahere34: This is off subject but has to do with the fact of the U.S. building a minor IC in korea. Can they move within striking distence of that when there not at war even though Japan can not end movement withing 2 zones of alaska or the western U.S.? Yes.  The United States is only prohibited from being next to Japanese soil in the Pacific.  If they want to leave their fleet next to SZ 6, but not in SZ 6, they may do so.

yukon and bc were combined into western canada.

what about from an allied POV though? Allied POV might work if Germany is on the defencive (not very common), but Japan has outgrown US economy but not taken India. (happends alot, especialy with kgf or balance) Allies need to keep Germany from activating Sweden (might be the easiest to isolate), Spain (easiest to attack) and Turkey (big UK army from 2IC in Egypt and Persia?). Goes without saying that allies attack land in africa and south america to boost their economy. Im not saying its usualy a good idea, but it might be a plausible strategy to get that little extra IPC that stops Japan from winning pacific side. (Japan gains nothing if allied DOW neutrals, unless they pick up Afgahnistan.) Now Cow sure is comming to trollpost me, no dubt Trow in your best comment.

@suprise: Page 18 of the Euro rule book and page 16 of the Pacific rule book   My interp. of this is 1 sub, 1 carr with 2 planes. the sub gets a hit what happens …… the carr is tipped and the planes are in the air  if the sub does not fire a second shot then the planes need to land within their movement allowance. If you had 2 subs and they both hit then the carr would go down  I would say the planes would get away because subs cant hit air units   Those two pages answer the Q’s for me The movement allowance is only one when defending. The planes would need to land on an adjacent island, coastal tt, or friendly carrier w/room on board.

Thanks

Thank you Calvin and Kreig.

I agree. It is also not rules compliant.