41 or 42 which do you

[Funcioneta]

@Whackamatt:

And why shouldn’t Japan out produce America if they have all of the industrial capacity and resources of Japan, China, India, the DEI, and Australia?

Japan should not be able of taking China, India and Australia so easily as do in most games, specially in 41 scenario  :wink:

[gamerman01]

@Funcioneta:

@Whackamatt:

And why shouldn’t Japan out produce America if they have all of the industrial capacity and resources of Japan, China, India, the DEI, and Australia?

Japan should not be able of taking China, India and Australia so easily as do in most games, specially in 41 scenario  :wink:

Yes, and now that Func’s weighed in, I might add, where would the Japs get all those men and material?  There was no freaking way.  The '41 scenario is simply a fantasy scenario, because there is no possible way Japan was that powerful.  There’s a reason they weren’t sure it was a good idea to surprise attack Pearl Harbor on a peaceful Sunday morning…

[axis_roll]

Allot depends on the optional rules involved.

Those who dislike 1941 for the imbalance should try a game without NOs.
National Objectives really sway the game in the Axis advantage too much:  Give the axis too much money while taking away those dollars from the Allies…

---

1942 is nice if Russia and UK can contain Germany, but that can be a very hard thing to do without some US help.
USA can certainly go toe to toe with Japan in 1942.