Global 2nd edition Q+A ( AAG40.2)

[Krieghund]

Yes, as long as other units are attacking the sub. Of course, if you’re not attacking the sub, there’s no reason for the cruiser to leave in combat movement, other than to attack somewhere else.

[General 6 Stars]

@Krieghund said in Global 2nd edition Q+A ( AAG40.2):

Yes, as long as other units are attacking the sub. Of course, if you’re not attacking the sub, there’s no reason for the cruiser to leave in combat movement, other than to attack somewhere else.

Right but then the transport should get same move. That’s like a double standard is my point.
Should be the same for all ships leaving sz to another combat whether transport loaded or not.

[Krieghund]

It is the same for all sea units leaving to attack somewhere else, as they behave normally. It’s only different for transports leaving to not attack somewhere else. It’s the price you pay for attacking the sub.

[aequitas-et-veritas]

Therefor prep your self and load your TT’s when a sub is arround.😉

[General 6 Stars]

@Krieghund said in Global 2nd edition Q+A ( AAG40.2):

It is the same for all sea units leaving to attack somewhere else, as they behave normally. It’s only different for transports leaving to not attack somewhere else. It’s the price you pay for attacking the sub.

So this tells me a transport can load and leave in combat to attack somewhere else

So basically it’s a form of a combat when Transports load in same sea zone as sub but can’t leave. Don’t agree with that. But of course this is for thaaaattttt g40 game.

[Krieghund]

@SS-GEN said in Global 2nd edition Q+A ( AAG40.2):

So this tells me a transport can load and leave in combat to attack somewhere else

Yes, if the sea zone is friendly, as it would be if only enemy subs and/or transports are there.

So basically it’s a form of a combat when Transports load in same sea zone as sub but can’t leave. Don’t agree with that. But of course this is for thaaaattttt g40 game.

I don’t understand what you’re saying here. Why can’t they leave? The sea zone is friendly, so they can do whatever they want. The only restrictions are that if the sub is being attacked, they must either leave or participate in that attack , and if they leave they can’t load unless they’re making an amphibious assault.

[General 6 Stars]

@Krieghund said in Global 2nd edition Q+A ( AAG40.2):

@SS-GEN said in Global 2nd edition Q+A ( AAG40.2):

So this tells me a transport can load and leave in combat to attack somewhere else

Yes, if the sea zone is friendly, as it would be if only enemy subs and/or transports are there.

So basically it’s a form of a combat when Transports load in same sea zone as sub but can’t leave. Don’t agree with that. But of course this is for thaaaattttt g40 game.

I don’t understand what you’re saying here. Why can’t they leave? The sea zone is friendly, so they can do whatever they want. The only restrictions are that if the sub is being attacked, they must either leave or participate in that attack , and if they leave they can’t load unless they’re making an amphibious assault.

The sub is not being attacked. What I read was if I’m correct if the transport wants to load and leave it can’t because of the sub. Then I’m not reading right. Ok. Then

[Joziu]

I have a question regarding amphibious assaults that came up in my last game:

I was playing Germany and I was going to conduct an amphibious assault against London. I had 3 transports off the coast of Norway that loaded 2 infantry and moved into the channel with a battleship, a cruiser, and an aircraft carrier supporting. In the channel was 1 destroyer. Since in the rules it states when conducting an amphibious assault you must make the sea zone you conduct it from friendly through a naval combat, and that when conducting an amphibious assault you may load troops from any territory along your transport’s movement path, am I able to load 3 tanks and 1 additional infantry from Normandy onto my transports and have them participate in the amphibious assault after my ships have destroyed the destroyer?

[General 6 Stars]

@Joziu you need to bring all loaded Transports with your ships together into the sz with defending destroyer. Then UK can scramble fighters to that naval battle too. Conduct naval combat. If you win naval battle and have Transports still alive then you can do amphibious assault. Somebody will explain in better detail soon

[Panther]

@Joziu Welcome to the forum. :slightly_smiling_face:

All amphibious assault related movement must be done during the Combat Move Phase. That means that all transports that will unload for the amphibious assault after the sea battle have to load and move during the Combat Move Phase phase. So that occurs before the sea battle starts. Those loaded transports will be part of the sea battle then and may unload into the hostile territory after the sea battle has ended successfully.

In your scenario you would not be able to load the units from Normandy as during Combat Move Phase SZ 110 is hostile due to the enemy destroyer - and you are not allowed to load transports in hostile seazones (an exception to that rule doesn’t match here).

[Aven]

Hello,
I’m a fairly new player, and got right into the Global edition after playing a few times on 1942.

I just wanted to get some clarification on something.

Can unescorted transports that are loaded naval invade an enemy zone during the combat move?
Regardless of if there are ships in the sea zone or not, or troops stationed in the land zone or not?

Thanks to all.

[Witt]

@Aven Good day.
A Transport can only unload (attack amphibiously) into an enemy territory in Combat Movement . The territory does not need to be Occupied. If it is, then combat takes place.
Non Combat is only for unloading into a Friendly territory.
I hope this answers your question. Ask again, if I habe not answered, however.

[Panther]

@Aven said in Global 2nd edition Q+A ( AAG40.2):

Can unescorted transports that are loaded naval invade an enemy zone during the combat move?
Regardless of if there are ships in the sea zone or not, or troops stationed in the land zone or not?

A transport is not allowed to offload land units for an amphibious assault in a sea zone containing one or more ignored enemy submarines unless at least one warship belonging to the attacking power is also present in the sea zone at the end of the Combat Move phase.

In case there are enemy surface warships present in the seazone, the seazone is hostile and must be cleared before unloading the transport for an amphibious assault.

Welcome to the forum :slightly_smiling_face:

[Aven]

@Wittmann @Panther Thank your for your assistance.

So that means a convoy would be able to naval invade with/without combat ship assistance given that there are no enemy ships in the sea zone?

[Witt]

@Aven a Transport can amphibiously invade a territory, if the Sea Zone is empty, yes.
It can go, unescorted, should you wish.
That is , as long as there is not an Air Base adjacent to the Sea Zone and a Fighter or Tactical Ft could scramble and Attack the Transport, of course.

[Aven]

@Wittmann Thank you for that clarification. :)

[simon33]

Looks like if Germany don’t DOW on USSR but leave one of their subs in SZ125, even though Italy does DOW, then USSR loses the lend lease bonus.

Rule:
“5 IPCs if the convoy in sea zone 125 is free of Axis warships, Archangel is controlled by the Soviet Union, and there are no units belonging to other Allied powers present in any territories originally controlled by the Soviet Union. Theme: National prestige and access to Allied Lend-Lease material.”

Has a clarification been issued on this point? Reading the rule text it seems that a nation not at war with USSR can affect their NOs, which is counter intuitive.

[Panther]

@simon33
Germany and Italy both are Axis powers. So yes, any Axis warship wil cancel that bonus. It does not matter that Germany is not at war with SU, yet, when Italy is.

[Krieghund]

Since it is Lend-Lease, think of it as Germany sinking supply ships belonging to the other Allies, which has nothing to do with being at war with the USSR.

[simon33]

Question. ANZAC has sea units in SZ20, which is a Kami zone. It wants to do an amphibious assault to Kiangsi from that sea zone. If I’m reading it right, ANZAC’s sea units can’t move on combat movement to escape the Kami even though there’s no reason for them to participate in sea combat. Now let’s say there’s 2CVs and 2 DDs. Both CVs and one DD are attacked by Kamis and one is hit once and damaged, other CV is missed and the DD is hit and sunk. Can any or all remaining units move on non combat movement? Or does it count as participating in combat? Only the DD?